https://ocs-pl.oktawave.com/v1/AUTH_2887234e- … i-mateview6.jpg
no dvi
no component digital,
no component analog,
no EURO
no s-video
no composite
no RF
no 15-pin D-sub
no 9-pin D-sub either 😉

robertmo wrote on 2021-08-12, 11:36:

https://ocs-pl.oktawave.com/v1/AUTH_2887234e- … i-mateview6.jpg no dvi no component digital, no component analog, no EURO no s-v […]
Show full quote

https://ocs-pl.oktawave.com/v1/AUTH_2887234e- … i-mateview6.jpg
no dvi
no component digital,
no component analog,
no EURO
no s-video
no composite
no RF
no 15-pin D-sub
no 9-pin D-sub either 😉

It has HDMI and mini-DP . DVI can be used with a passive adapter to HDMI (and an in-line EDID emulator, if needed).
For practically everything else on the list (including RF, which IMHO justifies modifying the source device for composite output instead) . P.S. I assume that by "component digital" you mean SDI and I presume you mean "SCART" when you say EURO :

a) there are adapters/converters/scalers available that would likely allow you to get better picture quality than whatever could have ended up being integrated in the monitor
b) if all that input functionality had been integrated, the monitor cost would have been significantly higher and useless to most buyers
c) even in the retro community, not everybody needs all that input functionality

At the end of the day, IMHO, it just makes more sense to let the ends users with specific use cases build a setup with proper adapters/scalers/converters than to build-in functionality that either will be unnecessary for most users or likely unsatisfactory and thus useless to aforementioned users with specific use cases .

For example, I have an OSSC and, if I wanted composite or s-video, I would likely add a RetroTink or Koryuu Transcoder and if I wanted digital RGB, I would consider one of these https://github.com/necroware/mce-adapter , etc .