VOGONS


First post, by Smack2k

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

So what is the consensus on best speed to run Wing Commander?

I have my 386 just about built but not sure if I should install the 25 or 33 MHZ CPU for it as my main goal is Wing Commander on the machine....

I have watched Phil's Videos and 25 looks to the best to run it "as it should be" but wanted to ask the community.

Reply 1 of 8, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

33 MHz is good. The game's going to vary from slower to faster depending on how many ships are in the area.

I guess video card speed and memory settings have a role, too.

My big-red-switch 486

Reply 2 of 8, by Malik

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

It's totally overkill just to build a machine based on a single game. Once the fad runs out, you'll be left with discontent.

I once did an experiment where I was dealing on internal and external cache via software and BIOS, combined with Turbo button switch on my Pentium 133 based machine. I was able to run Wing Commander at the proper fluid speed, without being too fast. That machine was versatile as I could play most DOS games at any comfortable speed.

That said, for the purpose of this discussion, 25MHz is the sweet spot, but there may be slowdowns with more ships/activities. 33MHz is more convenient, and not too fast.

5476332566_7480a12517_t.jpgSB Dos Drivers

Reply 3 of 8, by Smack2k

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Thanks for the info....I have 25 in there now...guess I will give it a shot at that speed and upgrade to 33 if needed

As for building for a single game...its OK, I have other plans for the 386 to, plus I have a bunch of other retro computers built for various gaming years....I just want one to play Wing Commander properly without making a ton of changes....

Reply 4 of 8, by fitzpatr

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I've been wondering this as well.

Fortunately, Phil has our backs. He recorded playing Wing Commander on several processors. To me I look for the sound effects to line up with the "Wing Commander" Title to determine when it is correctly timed.

Using that as my metric, the DX-25 and SX-33 seem correct. DX-33 is a bit fast, and DX-40 is very fast.

DX-25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxMt-bIm5bk&i … _6_byYe7oglQTc2

SX-33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uW7wvTn-In0&l … glQTc2&index=13

DX-33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6T0qd-A6WU&l … glQTc2&index=14

DX-40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqbhxhlN9_g&l … glQTc2&index=10

MT-32 Old, CM-32L, CM-500, SC-55mkII, SC-88Pro, SC-D70, FB-01, MU2000EX
K6-III+/450/GA-5AX/G400 Max/Voodoo2 SLI/CT1750/MPU-401AT/Audigy 2ZS
486 Build

Reply 5 of 8, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

There's another reference speed for the gameplay, also. The Kilrathi Saga Win95 re-release has the free running speed variance corrected, set at a brisk pace. This was my preferred version until MIDI became a concern.

I thought Secret Missions 2 already had a similar fix, but turns out what they had there was an adjustable frame delay.

My big-red-switch 486

Reply 7 of 8, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Did a quick test with Secret Missions 2 and it does have more consistent speed than the original executable, even before manual frame delay adjustments. It's probably the best gameplay reference to try to approximate. The perfect setup will still always have that slowdown in busier spots, though.

My big-red-switch 486

Reply 8 of 8, by cyclone3d

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It has been a very long while since I played the original Wing Commander. Pretty sure I had a 386DX 40 that I played it on back in the day.

When I upgraded to a 486DX2-66 it ran too fast.

You can always use a slowdown program such as moslo or similar to eat up some of the CPU cycles.

Yamaha modified setupds and drivers
Yamaha XG repository
YMF7x4 Guide
Aopen AW744L II SB-LINK