VOGONS


HardMPU, anyone?

Topic actions

Reply 180 of 608, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

If you want to know more about how to implement this, check with Dreamblaster.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 181 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Look guys, I made a thing.

Attachments

Reply 185 of 608, by matze79

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Very Nice 😀

will you offer Kits ?

https://www.retrokits.de - blog, retro projects, hdd clicker, diy soundcards etc
https://www.retroianer.de - german retro computer board

Reply 186 of 608, by stamasd

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Excellent. Does it work?

(don't worry, this is the question I ask of everything I build myself too 😀)

I/O, I/O,
It's off to disk I go,
With a bit and a byte
And a read and a write,
I/O, I/O

Reply 187 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
matze79 wrote:

will you offer Kits ?

That's the plan... Need to do some testing first, though.

stamasd wrote:

Excellent. Does it work?

I actually don't know yet 😁 I finished soldering it together last night, need to program the micro and test today.

Reply 189 of 608, by hard1k

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Wow! I'm after one!:)

Fortex, the A3D & XG/OPL3 accelerator (Vortex 2 + YMF744 combo sound card)
AWE64 Legacy
Please have a look at my wishlist (hosted on Amibay)

Reply 191 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

One small error that I will need to fix before ordering more boards though, it seems that the DE9 footprint I used is reversed for some reason, so the cable will need to be built with a mirror image of it's pinout.

Reply 192 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

OK guys, I have one board left. I'll send it to someone, free of charge (or for just shipping if you're not in the US), that can agree to:
1) Order parts and solder them in
2) Test the hell out of it
3) Contribute to debugging/fixes if problems do arise.

Any takers?

Reply 193 of 608, by RJDog

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
ab0tj wrote:

Any takers?

Oh, hell yeah, I'd be on board... but if I'm being honest I don't think I'd have the time to do justice to the kind of testing you're looking for, as much as I'd really really like to get my hands on it. Damn kids and adult obligations..

Reply 194 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
RJDog wrote:

Oh, hell yeah, I'd be on board... but if I'm being honest I don't think I'd have the time to do justice to the kind of testing you're looking for, as much as I'd really really like to get my hands on it. Damn kids and adult obligations..

Understood. It's those obligations that have made this project take as long as it has. And to be clear, I'm not asking for someone to devote their life to this- Just play games with it, note any problems, and ideally have some know-how to possibly make some contributions to the project. What I don't want is for it to just end up in someone's "to-do" pile with other unfinished projects.

Reply 195 of 608, by TheMobRules

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I'd love to help too, but I won't be able to get a break from work until around mid-february. Also, I fear I would only be able to contribute to the software/code side of things, since my knowledge of electronics is (very) limited.

Hopefully a Vogoner with enough time/skills will be able to take on this task, but in any case I'm 100% behind this project 😀

Reply 196 of 608, by RJDog

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
ab0tj wrote:

Just play games with it, note any problems, and ideally have some know-how to possibly make some contributions to the project. What I don't want is for it to just end up in someone's "to-do" pile with other unfinished projects.

It'd be my pleasure, and more than willing/able to contribute technically to the project. If you can't "sell" it to someone who can dedicate more time than I might be able to, hit me up.

Reply 197 of 608, by RJDog

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

ab0tj, the USER header... looks like it's connected to the second UART of the Atmega1284, where the actual external MIDI port is connected to the first UART (as expected). Are the signals on the second UART of the MC duplicated to/from the host (i.e. are the signals sent and received on the second UART identical as on the first) or would this require some customization of the firmware loaded onto the Atmega?

Reply 198 of 608, by ab0tj

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Right now the firmware does nothing with the second UART. It wouldn't take much to add an option to the config utility that switches the midi output to the second UART (or both).

Reply 199 of 608, by RJDog

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'm not sure if you answered this question before, but do you consider this project open-source, or more proprietary than that (i.e. you'd like to tightly control the firmware, etc.)?