VOGONS


CVX4 : high quality covox adapter

Topic actions

Reply 300 of 484, by keropi

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

^ Sadly Lethal Xcess seem to use a custom format and I can't locate a MOD version of it's theme...

About price, I don't think that removing the dip switches or the 4-5 caps would make a considerable impact in it , most of it is manufacturing/assembly cost I imagine and for such a small item a couple of components addition/removal is not something to drastically change the cost. *IMHO*

🎵 🎧 PCMIDI MPU , OrpheusII , Action Rewind , Megacard and 🎶GoldLib soundcard website

Reply 301 of 484, by keropi

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Just a heads-up for anyone interested, CVX-4 preorders are now open: http://www.serdashop.com/CVX4

🎵 🎧 PCMIDI MPU , OrpheusII , Action Rewind , Megacard and 🎶GoldLib soundcard website

Reply 302 of 484, by James-F

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Keropi, can you please give a small summary how the CVX4 compared to the Original.
Did we eventually figured out what resistors were in the original and how quiet is the result in comparison?


my important / useful posts are here

Reply 303 of 484, by keropi

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

- anyone correct me if I am wrong - but we determined the original uses 100K 0.1% resistor ladder with a divider at the end and no filter capacitor (maybe the covox speaker have it onboard, maybe not). CVX-4 lets you choose if you want a filter cap from several values, if you want to remove the DC bias or not and even if you want the divider or not. AFAIK if you match the original covox settings the result is 99% identical ... sadly I don't have the real thing to compare directly. You can hear some mod playback in the previous page - recorder through an Auzentech X-Fi Forte (had to apply the amplify effect on audacity though since the card records with a low volume from older sources...)

If you want any extra recording I will provide it 😀

🎵 🎧 PCMIDI MPU , OrpheusII , Action Rewind , Megacard and 🎶GoldLib soundcard website

Reply 305 of 484, by Jepael

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
keropi wrote:

- anyone correct me if I am wrong - but we determined the original uses 100K 0.1% resistor ladder with a divider at the end and no filter capacitor (maybe the covox speaker have it onboard, maybe not).

I will clarify a bit; yes the ladder is made with 100K and 200K resistances and there is a 25K resistance from ladder output to ground.
What we don't know is the original ladder tolerance as it is a custom resistor array part, but most likely due to manufacturing the resistances and their ratios are very closely matched between each other, so maybe the tolerance between resistances is even better than 0.1%, while the absolute values of the tolerance might be 1% or 2% as with standard resistor arrays.

So, for a 5V parallel port, this will give out 1V output signal (when unloaded), with output impedance of 20Kohm which is pretty high so even audio cable capacitance acts as a low-pass filter.
And as soon as it is connected to something that loads the output like sound card or amplifier input, the amplitude will drop.

Reply 306 of 484, by dreamblaster

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Jepael wrote:

I will clarify a bit; yes the ladder is made with 100K and 200K resistances and there is a 25K resistance from ladder output to ground.

Hi thanks all, for your support. The CVX4 has 100K 0.1% resistors instead of 100k + 200k resistors, this means all resistors are from the same reel so expected to be very close.
It is a small batch and I tried to make it the best and most featured. I cannot match the price of the cheapest clone, so I hope the good sound makes up for it.

Idea, but not sure if it would be worth the hassle : if someone outside Europe (for example in the US) wants to organize a group purchase, I could ship to him in one larger packet (10+ units), at lower unit price, without VAT. PM me if you want to do this.

Visit http://www.serdashop.com for retro sound cards, video converters, ...
DreamBlaster X2, S2, S2P, HDD Clicker, ... many projects !
New X2GS SE & X16GS sound card : https://www.serdashop.com/X2GS-SE ,
Thanks for your support !

Reply 307 of 484, by dreamblaster

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

a look at the geode GXm 233 Mhz thin client pc running cronologia demo with CVX4
https://youtu.be/8DWWFT0zFbE?t=1m5s
around 1m12 i show the pc and the CVX4 plugged into it

It is this pc : http://www.ebay.com/itm/272625508592
CPU: National Semiconductor Geode GXm CPU, PGA Socket 7, 233 Mhz, Enhanced MMX
Chipset: NS Geode CS5530A

The geode board is quite glitchy on the VGA visuals and sound, probably it is still too fast
for these 286 era demos.

Visit http://www.serdashop.com for retro sound cards, video converters, ...
DreamBlaster X2, S2, S2P, HDD Clicker, ... many projects !
New X2GS SE & X16GS sound card : https://www.serdashop.com/X2GS-SE ,
Thanks for your support !

Reply 308 of 484, by dreamblaster

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The 533 Mhz Celeron 'Pc Punaise' works much better for demos
Here's the overload demo, played through CVX4 on this pc : https://youtu.be/WhvBbs3OC5U

Visit http://www.serdashop.com for retro sound cards, video converters, ...
DreamBlaster X2, S2, S2P, HDD Clicker, ... many projects !
New X2GS SE & X16GS sound card : https://www.serdashop.com/X2GS-SE ,
Thanks for your support !

Reply 309 of 484, by matze79

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

why not make a Chip DAC ?

https://www.retrokits.de - blog, retro projects, hdd clicker, diy soundcards etc
https://www.retroianer.de - german retro computer board

Reply 311 of 484, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

There are options for harvesting data off the parallel pins. A powered parallel port DAC would make a very interesting project.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 312 of 484, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
gdjacobs wrote:

There are options for harvesting data off the parallel pins. A powered parallel port DAC would make a very interesting project.

What would the benefit be over a resistor pack or discrete ladder?

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 313 of 484, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Scali wrote:

What would the benefit be over a resistor pack or discrete ladder?

The simplest upgrade would be an opamp buffer on the output which would stabilize the performance of the DAC and present consistent output levels regardless of the characteristics of any downstream input you use. You wouldn't want to do much more, though, in order to maintain low power requirements for the device.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 314 of 484, by matze79

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I will make a Active Covox with Chip DAC and simple Amplifier when i'm done with this PS/2 to Microsoft Serialmouse Adapter Converter / Updated First Post / Firmware Update added ...
Parts ~6-7 €

https://www.retrokits.de - blog, retro projects, hdd clicker, diy soundcards etc
https://www.retroianer.de - german retro computer board

Reply 315 of 484, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
gdjacobs wrote:

The simplest upgrade would be an opamp buffer on the output which would stabilize the performance of the DAC and present consistent output levels regardless of the characteristics of any downstream input you use. You wouldn't want to do much more, though, in order to maintain low power requirements for the device.

But the output of the DAC would still be too low to drive a line-out, headphones or speakers, right?
In which case you'd need another amp for that.
But if you were to connect the resistor ladder to such an amp, you'd get the same advantages of buffered output and stabilized/consistent output anyway.

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 316 of 484, by matze79

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

and you also need additonal power, because not all lpt's are have enough left to power this solution.
maybe you can get some power from status line etc with low schottky diodes..

EDIT:
http://320volt.com/en/paralel-port-dijital-an … -cikis-tda7050/

https://www.retrokits.de - blog, retro projects, hdd clicker, diy soundcards etc
https://www.retroianer.de - german retro computer board

Reply 317 of 484, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
matze79 wrote:
and you also need additonal power, because not all lpt's are have enough left to power this solution. maybe you can get some pow […]
Show full quote

and you also need additonal power, because not all lpt's are have enough left to power this solution.
maybe you can get some power from status line etc with low schottky diodes..

EDIT:
http://320volt.com/en/paralel-port-dijital-an … -cikis-tda7050/

Well, I'd go for external power. Just put a connector on it. Then you can wire it up however you like: A mains adapter, tapping +5v from a COM port, tapping +5v from some USB, or from a floppy connector or whatnot.
Getting +5v from a PC shouldn't be too difficult 😀

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 318 of 484, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Scali wrote:

But the output of the DAC would still be too low to drive a line-out, headphones or speakers, right?
In which case you'd need another amp for that.
But if you were to connect the resistor ladder to such an amp, you'd get the same advantages of buffered output and stabilized/consistent output anyway.

Certainly not speakers, it would be for a line in or perhaps headphones (with a high enough impedance). Much would depend on how much power you can harvest from the LPT lines. Of course, sourcing external power removes a lot of complexity in engineering something like this.

In an ideal world, you could depend on any downstream amplifier input being deterministic, but impedance characteristics just aren't the same between designs.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 319 of 484, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
gdjacobs wrote:

In an ideal world, you could depend on any downstream amplifier input being deterministic, but impedance characteristics just aren't the same between designs.

Yea, but my point has always been to integrate the amp on the PCB, so it becomes part of the design.
Because imho, the Covox is pretty useless by itself, because the output is too low for any of the normal things you'd want to connect to it (headphones, line-in of some amp, unpowered speakers... powered speakers may work, but might be too noisy and not very loud, because the input is much lower than what they normally expect).
I would much prefer it to have a 'normal' output level, like any common sound card.
The real Covox solved this by having custom-designed powered speakers, so they modified the pre-amp in the speakers to work with the low output of the Covox.
Many clones used lower resistance to get more gain on the line-out, but as we found, you trade in linearity in the DAC, so the sound quality suffers considerably.

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/