VOGONS


First post, by GiSWiG

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I just want to confirm what I've read up on this (which I can only find one real source)

I have two Turtle Beach Vortex2 cards. One has AU8830 written on the chip and the other has AU8830A2.

From what I have read, the AU8830A2 is an older version Vortex2 chip and has lower performance than the newer AU8830 chip.

True or false?

Steamer/GOG-er: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 3.7GHz all cores | Mushkin 8GB DDR3 RAM 1333 w/ 6-6-6-18 1T | Dual AMD Radeon HD 6850s in CrossFireX | X-Fi Titanium | Dual-boot Windows XP and Vista

Reply 1 of 1, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yes, the later chip revision has slightly lower CPU utilization and thus better performance; several reviews found a measurable difference there.

-Revision A2, on the Diamond MX300 among others, pictured here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/common … Sound_MX300.jpg
-Revision B0, on the Aureal SQ2500, the top card here: http://i.imgur.com/veJh9j4.jpg (Note the bottom card - Vortex2 SuperQuad or SQ2500 Optical - looks like an example of an A2 revision using the later marking scheme, so "AU8830 vs. AU8830A2" may not be a sure indication of revision.)

Not very consequential. The rest of the board is as important in practice, in my opinion. There are test graphs showing the Diamond MX300 producing a better analog response than Aureal's reference A2 revision boards; just where the later revision equipped boards or Turtle Beach designs place is unknown.

My big-red-switch 486