VOGONS

Voodoo 3 3000 or TNT 2 M64

Topic actions

First post, by cheese007

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Recently happened into an absurdly cheap Voodoo 3 2000 after setting up a retro rig with mostly-free parts, including the above-mentioned TNT 2 M64. I've been trying to find out (both from reading threads on here and elsewhere) which of these two cards I should stick with but I haven't got a clear answer to which is the "better" performer. Took me a hot minute to get this machine functional as-is so I'd rather not futz with it unless the Voodoo is a worthwhile upgrade. Specs as follows:

Pentium III "Katmai" 500mhz
512Mb SDRAM PC100 (mixed sticks)
Soundblaster Live! Value
TNT 2 M64 16MB AGP OR Voodoo 3 3000 16MB AGP

Reply 1 of 6, by konc

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Whenever you encounter an absurdly cheap Voodoo you grab it and think later.
Jokes aside, regardless of which card is a "better performer", the voodoo has the glide games compatibility to offer, something that the tnt hasn't. I don't mean that you need this, but to consider other aspects of the cards too.

Reply 2 of 6, by Joseph_Joestar

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The Voodoo 3 3000 is comparable to a full TNT2. The M64 is a cut down version of the latter and performs about 50% slower.

To answer your question, the Voodoo 3 is better than the M64.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Athlon64 3400+ / Asus K8V-MX / 5900XT / Audigy2
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 970 / X-Fi

Reply 3 of 6, by cheese007

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Followed folks advice and installed the Voodoo. Noticeably improved performance and multiple DOS games that were glitchy/refused to run with the TNT 2 now work perfect. Worth the effort!

Reply 4 of 6, by DonCatoli

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Interesting that you ran into DOS issues with the TNT2 as it is typically the more compatible of the two. With the V3 3000 I would recommend flashing it to the latest VBIOS rev which is 2.15.12 assuming it is not already on it and if you are comfortable with flashing cards however be warned that flashing a voodoo3 can be tricky as the flash tool can glitch and fail the flash like it did to me [and has happened to others] until I got the modified 2.15.07 VBIOS that corrects an issue with flashing, after flashing to that I then was able to flash any non-modified VBIOS to them.

Late PCI, early and middle AGP video chips DOS game compatibility test results https://gona.mactar.hu/DOS_TESTS/

Reply 5 of 6, by auron

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
DonCatoli wrote on 2022-12-24, 00:44:

Interesting that you ran into DOS issues with the TNT2 as it is typically the more compatible of the two. [/url]

i think 3dfx is preferable to nvidia at least for build engine stuff, the nvidia cards seem to exhibit the "snow" corruption during screen tint effects (damage/picking up health) a lot more strongly.

Reply 6 of 6, by DonCatoli

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
auron wrote on 2022-12-29, 06:34:
DonCatoli wrote on 2022-12-24, 00:44:

Interesting that you ran into DOS issues with the TNT2 as it is typically the more compatible of the two. [/url]

i think 3dfx is preferable to nvidia at least for build engine stuff, the nvidia cards seem to exhibit the "snow" corruption during screen tint effects (damage/picking up health) a lot more strongly.

Perhaps a VBIOS related issue?, based off the DOS compatibility chart the TNT2 fares better than the 3dfx. https://gona.mactar.hu/DOS_TESTS/

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Back to Video
Close window
Close window