VOGONS


GeForce2 Ti vs. Matrox G400

Topic actions

Reply 40 of 41, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Had G400 dual head, that I purchased for the reason, in rebuilt Dell dimension 8300 (was a barebones, added my parts based on P4 2.8C and new capacitors) so I can test repaired monitors at same time and sharp, fast so for viewing schematics at former work. Schematic is not 11 x 8.5" format means lot of scrolling in all directions with mouse. Aka giant pdf.

Cheers,

Reply 41 of 41, by oohms

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Matrox had great 2D image quality and a fantastic marketing department - that's it.

I still remember the Matrox and Pentium Pro posters all over the school IT department and we all wanted those as kids - nothing to do with how good either of those were at gaming, compared to more sensible alternatives 😀

DOS/w3.11/w98 | K6-III+ 400ATZ @ 550 | FIC PA2013 | 128mb SDram | Voodoo 3 3000 | Avancelogic ALS100 | Roland SC-55ST
DOS/w98/XP | Core 2 Duo E4600 | Asus P5PE-VM | 512mb DDR400 | Ti4800SE | ForteMedia FM801