3Dfx Voodoo 2 8MB - which S7 CPU?

Discussion about old graphics cards, monitors and video related things.

Re: 3Dfx Voodoo 2 8MB - which S7 CPU?

Postby Jasin Natael » 2019-4-12 @ 21:32

Yes it is a bit more voltage than most would like to use, but I slapped a big heatsink and fan on mine and it did just fine.
AOpen AP53 AMD K6/2 - 233MHZ - 64MB RAM 20GB WD HDD Win98SE

Compaq Presario 5152 AMD K6-III+ 550MHZ 512MB RAM ATi Radeon 9250SE 256MB PCI Aureal Vortex 2

Asus A7V-VE AMD Athlon T-Bird 1.20GHZ 512MB RAM ATi Radeon 7500 DDR 64MB Vortex 2 32GB KingSpec SSD
User avatar
Jasin Natael
Newbie
 
Posts: 56
Joined: 2017-3-18 @ 04:11
Location: United States

Re: 3Dfx Voodoo 2 8MB - which S7 CPU?

Postby ph4nt0m » 2019-4-18 @ 20:11

havli wrote:Cyrix really isn't that great performance-wise... and runs rather hot too. Looking at my test results MII @ 3*83=250 MHz is just barely faster than P233 MMX and same like K6-2 233. MII @ 3*100=300 MHz beats K6-2 300 (66 MHz FSB) by 4% and loses to Pentium Pro 200/256 :evil:


AMD K6-2 300MHz (3x100):

Image

Cyrix 6x86MII 300MHz (3x100):

Image

BTW not hot at all because it's 180nm. +4% ALU perf over the K6-2. FPU sucks.

Intel Pentium MMX 300MHz (3x100) overclocked:

Image

ALU sucks. FPU shines.

300MHz Cyrix is much, much faster than 200MHz Pentium Pro. This one is overclocked to 266MHz and still slower on ALU.

Image
User avatar
ph4nt0m
Member
 
Posts: 229
Joined: 2018-1-01 @ 19:03

Re: 3Dfx Voodoo 2 8MB - which S7 CPU?

Postby havli » 2019-4-19 @ 15:08

This is just one cherry-picked benchmark, how about some real life applications? http://hw-museum.cz/article/5/cpu-histo ... ---1999-/1

And btw - 180nm Cyrix is very hard to find. I have never seen one, just bunch of the older ones and those run very hot.
HW museum.cz - my collection of PC hardware
User avatar
havli
Oldbie
 
Posts: 789
Joined: 2014-11-07 @ 16:51
Location: Czech Republic

Re: 3Dfx Voodoo 2 8MB - which S7 CPU?

Postby ph4nt0m » 2019-4-21 @ 12:11

Well, Ziff-Davis CPU / FPU enchmarks are quick and their results are quite reliable. They don't use MMX, SSE, 3DNow! etc.

When I test overclocked CPUs, I use a simple yet very extensive "benchmark". Boot an old Linux / FreeBSD / NetBSD release and compile a generic kernel with 'time make'. Compilers stress ALUs, branch prediction, caches, memory. It takes 3120 seconds, give or take a few, or 52 minutes to build a generic NetBSD 2.1 kernel on a 300MHz Cyrix 6x86MII + FIC VA-503+ (VIA MVP3, 1Mb cache) + PC100 SDRAM 2-2-2. If a CPU doesn't segfault or produce some other error in the process, consider it a successful overclock. Many overclocked Cyrix CPUs can do benchmarks in Windows yet fail in less than 2 minutes of compile time.

180nm PR400 and PR433 Cyrix 6x86MII with gold tops are quite rare, but there are more common mobile 180nm PR333 with gray tops. These are earlier steppings than gold tops. Although they cannot do 300MHz usually no matter what voltage.

Image
User avatar
ph4nt0m
Member
 
Posts: 229
Joined: 2018-1-01 @ 19:03

Previous

Return to Video

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests