Matrox driver performance

Discussion about old graphics cards, monitors and video related things.

Matrox driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-5-15 @ 05:25

Just like my other threads about driver performance https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=66563, https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=66296 and https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=65409

The card I used is a Matrox G400max (150/200). I used the same test setup: P3/800EB, intel OR840 board, 512MB 800MHz RDRAM and a Creative Soundblaster live.

Here are the benchmark results:

g400drvp398.png


g400drvp399.png


I am going to do a comparison of just the different TurboGLs but I'm going to do it on a 440BX board. The reason for this is the OR840 has no AGP aperture setting and it defaults to a size of 64MB. Matrox recommended an aperture setting of 256MB, lower than this and you may get texture corruption or crashes. I did test the games that worked fine with the TurboGL and an AGP aperture size of 64MB.
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby appiah4 » 2019-5-15 @ 13:12

You, sir, are godsend.
1989:A500|+512K|ACA500+|C1084S
1992:HIPPO-VL+|U5SX-33|8M|GD5428|CT2290|S2
1995:P5I430VX|P133|32M|S3T64+/MX2|V1|CT3980/32M
1998:S1573S|K6-2/400|64M|V2/SLI|CT4500/32M
2001:GA-6OXT|P3-1200|384M|GF3Ti200|MX300
2004:K8VD|3700+|2G|X1950PRO|SB0350
User avatar
appiah4
l33t
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: 2017-2-19 @ 07:36

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby dottoss » 2019-5-15 @ 13:32

Thank you for this! I was just doing a Matrox build and was wondering which driver to use. It seems the latest are overall good enough :)
User avatar
dottoss
Newbie
 
Posts: 98
Joined: 2014-7-08 @ 11:30

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby Tiido » 2019-5-15 @ 22:30

It is interesting to see that here we see a general trend of higher performance with newer drivers but with other manufacturers comparisons I have seen show mostly the opposite lol.
User avatar
Tiido
Oldbie
 
Posts: 770
Joined: 2018-1-14 @ 04:40
Location: Estonia

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby swaaye » 2019-5-16 @ 19:18

I think the 256MB AGP Aperture recommendation is related to BIOS bugs with some motherboards. Digging through the MURC forum shows some people had major problems with the cards if AGP aperture wasn't at 256MB.

Look at TurboGL go. :) It's supposedly quite nice for K6-2/3 too. I think G400 is troublesome on those motherboards though. The usual AGP quirks.
User avatar
swaaye
Moderator
 
Posts: 7397
Joined: 2002-7-22 @ 21:24
Location: WI, USA

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby appiah4 » 2019-5-16 @ 20:29

swaaye wrote:I think the 256MB AGP Aperture recommendation is related to BIOS bugs with some motherboards. Digging through the MURC forum shows some people had major problems with the cards if AGP aperture wasn't at 256MB.

Look at TurboGL go. :) It's supposedly quite nice for K6-2/3 too. I think G400 is troublesome on those motherboards though. The usual AGP quirks.


Can TurboGL be used with a G450? Support came with 6.x drivers..
1989:A500|+512K|ACA500+|C1084S
1992:HIPPO-VL+|U5SX-33|8M|GD5428|CT2290|S2
1995:P5I430VX|P133|32M|S3T64+/MX2|V1|CT3980/32M
1998:S1573S|K6-2/400|64M|V2/SLI|CT4500/32M
2001:GA-6OXT|P3-1200|384M|GF3Ti200|MX300
2004:K8VD|3700+|2G|X1950PRO|SB0350
User avatar
appiah4
l33t
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: 2017-2-19 @ 07:36

Re: Matrox driver performance

Postby bofh.fromhell » 2019-5-17 @ 22:25

Fantastic job !
I had a feeling that Matrox improve over the driver revisions.
But its nice to know =)

The Matrox cards definitly have their limitations.
But I really like them as retro cards !
User avatar
bofh.fromhell
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: 2019-2-09 @ 16:11


Return to Video

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mattrock1988 and 3 guests