Predator99 wrote:Not worth keeping...?! Thats a great CGA with composite out, rather hard to get..give it to somebody who knows about retro computers :-p
My target is 3dfx era, roughly 1996-2000. Before that (before 1996) I was too young, and yes, I know little about computers from that era, that's why I asked for identification. After that (after 2000) things started to become "mainstream" (imho), plus only two major players were competing (ATI and Nvidia).
I decided to focus on that period, but still keep a few cards before and after that period. But I will try to keep only the "relevant" cards. What do I mean by that? Well, I would keep Ti4600, Radeon 9700 Pro, etc, but *not* MX440, Radeon 9250, etc. So only high end card and cards that were iconic.
I know well the cards made after 2000, so it's not a problem for me to decide what to keep, however, as I said, I'm not very familiar with cards made before 1996.
Bottom line, I would like to know from those that are more experienced than me if some of the cards are *relevant* (top end or otherwise important).
Given the card was looking very generic and I couldn't find a lot of information about it, combined with vlask's answer I assumed it's a boring mainstream card that's not worth keeping - I repeat - for me.
If I'm wrong I don't mind if I'm corrected (ideally with some arguments why the card was considered great).