VOGONS


First post, by smoke86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I just got an AMD R7 240 (1GB DDR3) low profile graphics card to run in Dell Optiplex 755 (Xeon x3363, 8GB RAM, 249GB SSD, WinXP Pro) and it instantly gave me an headache.
Currently I use HD8490 graphics card that works reasonably well (Stalker COP in 1024x768, max details, full dynamic lighting), but I wanted to change it for something better.
On a paper, R7 is better in every single way (128bit VRAM vs 64bit, better GPU), but its perormance is way worse than on HD8490, abovementioned Stalker is a slide-show.
I tried 3 different drivers, but nothing changed.
I ran out of ideas, I'd appreciate some help.

Last edited by smoke86 on 2023-11-23, 19:56. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 1 of 15, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Yeah that's odd, should be something like twice the GPU performance.

A lot of people are talking about DX9 problems with later AMD GPU though and the general recommendation is to try https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk which implements DX9 in Vulkan, but I am not sure if this GPU is beefy enough in Vulkan for it to help.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 2 of 15, by smoke86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'll try it, will see.
In meantime I will also try same game in Windows 11 (machine is dual boot) if the same problem occur.
I wonder if it shall matter that R7 id PCiex x8 card and HD8490 is x16.

Reply 4 of 15, by Munx

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Are you sure its an R7 and not R5? Wikipedia says the 1GB model is the 64-bit R5 only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_gra … deon_200_series

If your HD 8490 is the GDDR5 version, it has twice the memory bandwidth of an R5 240, which could explain the performance difference.

My builds!
The FireStarter 2.0 - The wooden K5
The Underdog - The budget K6
The Voodoo powerhouse - The power-hungry K7
The troll PC - The Socket 423 Pentium 4

Reply 5 of 15, by smoke86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
bakemono wrote on 2023-11-22, 18:10:
smoke86 wrote on 2023-11-21, 21:23:

I just got an AMD R7 240 (1GB DDR3)

Is your HD8490 also DDR3?

Yes, but HD8490 has 64bit bus

Munx wrote on 2023-11-22, 18:20:

Are you sure its an R7 and not R5? Wikipedia says the 1GB model is the 64-bit R5 only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_gra … deon_200_series
If your HD 8490 is the GDDR5 version, it has twice the memory bandwidth of an R5 240, which could explain the performance difference.

I'm sure, sticker says R7, Windows device manager says R7 and GPU-Z says R7. Wikipedia is sometimes wrong. HD8490 is DDR3.

Reply 7 of 15, by smoke86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

What for? There is nothing weird about GPU-Z readings, pretty much what you may expect.
I can confirm however, that under Win11 with DX11 card works flawlessly, which pretty much narrows down a problem to DX9 -> R7 corelation.

EDIT: DXVK makes the game crash at startup.

Reply 8 of 15, by swaaye

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Maybe try some more D3D 9 games and see how they behave in comparison. And perhaps try to get some much older drivers if you haven't.

You could also try a later STALKER game with D3D 10/10.1/11. I don't remember if there was ever a mod to put Shadow of Chernobyl on a newer iteration of the engine. STALKER games after SoC were actually developed with some ATI/AMD partnership but that was prior to those GCN based cards.

Reply 9 of 15, by smoke86

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Oh, my bad - it was Stalker COP, not SOC.
It runs bad under WinXP in DX9.
It runs well in Win11 in DX11. Funny part is that it does not work at all under Win11 in DX9 mode.

Reply 10 of 15, by Munx

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

CoP also has a DX8 shader left over for GeForce FX cards, which is pretty wild when you think about it - from DX8 all the way up to DX11.

My builds!
The FireStarter 2.0 - The wooden K5
The Underdog - The budget K6
The Voodoo powerhouse - The power-hungry K7
The troll PC - The Socket 423 Pentium 4

Reply 12 of 15, by swaaye

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It's a pretty heavy game for either card.

About a year ago I was running it on a i5 4570 / RTX 2080 machine and noticed that D3D9 mode was obviously slowest. I was tweaking grass distance, FOV and anti-aliasing though. I figured they had used some new D3D features with 10/11 and got better utilization (CPU?) or rendering efficiency. I've read the D3D11 mode is actually best avoided because it is a bit buggy.

You could play around with Mantle API games on that R7 240.

Reply 13 of 15, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
swaaye wrote on 2023-11-30, 01:52:

It's a pretty heavy game for either card.

About a year ago I was running it on a i5 4570 / RTX 2080 machine and noticed that D3D9 mode was obviously slowest. I was tweaking grass distance, FOV and anti-aliasing though. I figured they had used some new D3D features with 10/11 and got better utilization (CPU?) or rendering efficiency.

You could play around with Mantle API games on that R7 240.

Off topic:
How is the RTX 2080 for directx 10, 11 and 12 games? I meant the PRE-ray tracing games.

I wanted to choose RTX 2080 for better performance in later games and leave older GTX cards to play with directx 9 games.

Cheers,

Great Northern aka Canada.

Reply 14 of 15, by swaaye

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
pentiumspeed wrote on 2023-11-30, 02:03:

Off topic:
How is the RTX 2080 for directx 10, 11 and 12 games? I meant the PRE-ray tracing games.

I wanted to choose RTX 2080 for better performance in later games and leave older GTX cards to play with directx 9 games.

It's excellent. I've played a few oldies, like Dishonored, Singularity, Supreme Commander, Stalker COP, and Walking Dead Survival Instinct. It has the performance of a 1080 Ti but with the RT extras. I also really like the DLDSR feature of the RTX cards. It's less of a hit than normal DSR and it has additional anti-aliasing that is quite effective. It's great for all those Unreal Engine 3 games with aliasing everywhere and only weak FXAA/MLAA options.

You probably want to have a fairly modern >= 600W PSU.

Reply 15 of 15, by pentiumspeed

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
swaaye wrote on 2023-11-30, 04:34:
pentiumspeed wrote on 2023-11-30, 02:03:

Off topic:
How is the RTX 2080 for directx 10, 11 and 12 games? I meant the PRE-ray tracing games.

I wanted to choose RTX 2080 for better performance in later games and leave older GTX cards to play with directx 9 games.

It's excellent. I've played a few oldies, like Dishonored, Singularity, Supreme Commander, Stalker COP, and Walking Dead Survival Instinct. It has the performance of a 1080 Ti but with the RT extras. I also really like the DLDSR feature of the RTX cards. It's less of a hit than normal DSR and it has additional anti-aliasing that is quite effective. It's great for all those Unreal Engine 3 games with aliasing everywhere and only weak FXAA/MLAA options.

You probably want to have a fairly modern >= 600W PSU.

Thank you so much, since RTX 2080 is reasonable priced for used one.

PSU is not my issue, I know this.

Cheers,

Great Northern aka Canada.