VOGONS

Common searches


First post, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

While my Windows 7 machine is out of action I came up with an idea for a temporary pc, ideally one that could run me and my friend's favorite Source based game. At last I got my dodgy Soyo p4s Dragon motherboard working, put in a 2.8 p4, threw the 3x1gb sticks of ddr266 back into it and paired it with a Geforce ti4200. No idea about the fps, but with EVERY setting set to the minimum and at 640x480 resolution it is pretty much unplayable. When there is no action I get a buttery smooth consistent gameplay. As soon as people start moving and shooting it turns into a slow mess. Keep in mind that this is the Steam version of the game. Any tips on getting this working better? or if it is possible to do so? I have a x1950 pro that could replace the Geforce4 but only a 250watt powersupply 😢

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1

Reply 1 of 8, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It's a game from the end of 2007 / beginning of 2008.

A Core 2 Duo with a 8800GT shoudl do the trick.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 3 of 8, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

http://www.game-debate.com/games/index.php?g_ … %20Fortress%202 according to the minimum system specs I have found it should run ok. Maybe dx8 could be the issue?

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1

Reply 4 of 8, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
leileilol wrote:

But it's a game with a ton of creeped in materialistic bloat. It will not run well on its release period systems as it used to.

This was what had me worried. How with updates over the years these online games run worse and worse on older hardware.

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1

Reply 5 of 8, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I think you could dare to try the X1950 Pro with the 250W PSU as longs as it has 15+ amps on the 12v rail.
The Northwood 2.8 GHz CPU + X1950 Pro do need 18+ amps if you go by the specifications but in real life I have found that the X1950 Pro isnt very power hungry.

This review at guru3d.com has some information concerning what you can get away with PSU wise when it comes to ATI X 1xxx video cards.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/radeon-x … b-review,3.html

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 7 of 8, by RacoonRider

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I remember trying it on C2D E6300, 4Gb RAM and HD5670. Same thing, smooth as silk until someone starts shooting. I did not try detail settings below average though, I'm just never happy with minimum settings.

Reply 8 of 8, by ODwilly

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Ended up severely cpu bottle necked. not even the x1950 could make up for the slow cpu. Used a 300watt power supply to try it out, ran fine and stable. There were indeed 15 amps on the 12v rail xD haha. It worked ok with normal web browsing but was a really slow system all-in-all.

Main pc: Asus ROG 17. R9 5900HX, RTX 3070m, 16gb ddr4 3200, 1tb NVME.
Retro PC: Soyo P4S Dragon, 3gb ddr 266, 120gb Maxtor, Geforce Fx 5950 Ultra, SB Live! 5.1