bten wrote on 2024-03-14, 18:28:

Thank you for testing for me, I appreciate it.
Gonna return and get an FX card from a known manufacturer.

I also found this:

https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/geforce-2-m … -64mb-400.2964/

I bought Apollo Gf2 Mx 64m and had 1200 on 3dMark2001. Took off heatsink and found Mx200 on chip. ;(

Should be another piece of evidence in case the seller doesn't believe you.

asdf53 wrote on 2024-03-14, 20:13:

I also found this: […]
Show full quote

bten wrote on 2024-03-14, 18:28:

Thank you for testing for me, I appreciate it.
Gonna return and get an FX card from a known manufacturer.

I also found this:

https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/geforce-2-m … -64mb-400.2964/

I bought Apollo Gf2 Mx 64m and had 1200 on 3dMark2001. Took off heatsink and found Mx200 on chip. ;(

Should be another piece of evidence in case the seller doesn't believe you.

Thank you. Again I appreciate the help.
Learned my lesson buying no-name gpus. Better it happened on a cheap one than if I bought something pricey.

Staying away from this "Apollo" brand 🤣.

As the original poster in the weird geforce2 post, I'd like to know if your card came in this box?

Under hwinfo
Core=200mhz
Ram=125mhz
3dmark99-2603
3dmark2000-2122
It might not be fast but seems fairly stable, and image quality is better than the tnt2 m64 I had in the system

sydres wrote on 2024-04-06, 17:35:

As the original poster in the weird geforce2 post, I'd like to know if your card came in this box? IMG_20240406_132209564.jpg Un […]
Show full quote

As the original poster in the weird geforce2 post, I'd like to know if your card came in this box?
IMG_20240406_132209564.jpg
Under hwinfo
Core=200mhz
Ram=125mhz
3dmark99-2603
3dmark2000-2122
It might not be fast but seems fairly stable, and image quality is better than the tnt2 m64 I had in the system

Yes, identical box with identically odd peeling adhesive material.

Interesting I need to pull mine back out and check the GPU. I'm pretty sure when I pulled off the heat sink mine said mx 400!