VOGONS


486sx and 486dx

Topic actions

First post, by Baoran

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I have a 486 motherboard which I don't know how to configure jumper settings for. It came with 486sx 33Mhz cpu and seems to work fine with the jumper settings that were set when it arrived in mail. Can I change that cpu to 486dx 33Mhz cpu without changing any jumpers?

Reply 2 of 27, by alvaro84

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I often see different settings for SX and DX in 486 motherboard manuals. But I don't understand why. Whenever I was lazy and ignored these settings the system worked just fine.

Shame on us, doomed from the start
May God have mercy on our dirty little hearts

Reply 3 of 27, by RobertJ

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Most of the time, just swapping the CPU will have the desired effect. Not too many games took advantage of the DX versus the SX, but those that did were amazing.

8-bit Collection: 4 64Cs, 6 1541-IIs, 1 C128, 2 1571s, 1 C128DCR
Vintage DOS: Dell Optiplex G1, ATI Rage IIC, Sound Blaster CT4520, Thrustmaster FCS Mark II, Gravis PC GamePad
Monitor: Dell 20" 2007FPb

Reply 4 of 27, by badmojo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
RobertJ wrote:

Most of the time, just swapping the CPU will have the desired effect. Not too many games took advantage of the DX versus the SX, but those that did were amazing.

Never heard if any game taking advantage of it, could you provide an example?

Life? Don't talk to me about life.

Reply 5 of 27, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

There are very few. Sim City uses it for faster statistics calculation, and Quake doesn't even run without. Can't think of any other game that makes use of it but doesn't require a Pentium, which always had an FPU anyway.

Last edited by derSammler on 2018-02-01, 20:36. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 6 of 27, by Radical Vision

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Still no matter what the SX is like D class car, while DX is like S class car...
The d class will do the job fine, but the S class have premium feeling, that is why everyone wants S class not D...

Mah systems retro, old, newer (Radical stuff)
W3680 4.5/ GA-x58 UD7/ R9 280x
K7 2.6/ NF7-S/ HD3850
IBM x2 P3 933/ GA-6VXD7/ Voodoo V 5.5K
Cmq P2 450/ GA-BX2000/ V2 SLI
IBM PC365
Cmq DeskPRO 486/33
IBM PS/2 Model 56
SPS IntelleXT 8088

Reply 7 of 27, by Baoran

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I guess the motherboard doesn't care which cpu is installed because in the table before booting it says "80486dx or 80486sx". I found jumper settings online for very similar motherboard online, but actually the jumper that is suppose to set either sx or dx is missing from my motherboard, so perhaps my motherboard is different revision or something.

Reply 8 of 27, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Radical Vision wrote:

Still no matter what the SX is like D class car, while DX is like S class car...
The d class will do the job fine, but the S class have premium feeling, that is why everyone wants S class not D...

Everyone wants the DX probably because it's the real 486, whereas the SX is gelded. In the first two years of the 486, there wasn't even a SX. (and no DX either, as those monikers were introduced in 1991 with the SX)

Reply 9 of 27, by vladstamate

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Radical Vision wrote:

Still no matter what the SX is like D class car, while DX is like S class car...
The d class will do the job fine, but the S class have premium feeling, that is why everyone wants S class not D...

Not for 486 it isn't. Like people mentioned before unless you play Quake, you would not see any difference between an 486SX 33Mhz and 486DX 33Mhz.

386 SX vs DX, that is a different question.

YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7HbC_nq8t1S9l7qGYL0mTA
Collection: http://www.digiloguemuseum.com/index.html
Emulator: https://sites.google.com/site/capex86/
Raytracer: https://sites.google.com/site/opaqueraytracer/

Reply 10 of 27, by Baoran

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Most people here seem to just build high Mhz 486 systems. I usually just think about what I want to do with the system. I had originally planned building a 33Mhz 486dx system before I even got the motherboard and I had the 486dx cpu ready for it. in the early 90s I pretty much skipped 486 completelly. I went from 386 33Mhz to Pentium 90Mhz. 486 33Mhz seems be the most flexible system in my opinion when it comes to compatibility with dos games.

Reply 11 of 27, by Azarien

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
vladstamate wrote:

Not for 486 it isn't. Like people mentioned before unless you play Quake, you would not see any difference between an 486SX 33Mhz and 486DX 33Mhz.

Quake is playable only in low resolutions like 320x200 on a 100 MHz 486DX, I can't imagine playing it on a 33 MHz, though technically it should run.

I remember that I did make a lot of use of the FPU unit in my 486 (like 3D raytracing, some video watching) but who would use a 486 for such tasks today. Not fun.
And that was a 100 MHz.

But if I had a choice, I would take the DX version, of course.

If you replace an SX with a DX, just make sure it works as it should, e.g. try to start Quake and watch the slideshow 😀

Reply 13 of 27, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
badmojo wrote:

Never heard if any game taking advantage of it, could you provide an example?

Falcon 3.0 had an enhanced mode if you had an FPU.

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 14 of 27, by vladstamate

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Baoran wrote:

How much ram quake requires?

I can run Quake on a 486 DX2 66Mhz with 20Mb of RAM at 5.6FPS (time demo).You might be able to run with 4Mb only.

YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7HbC_nq8t1S9l7qGYL0mTA
Collection: http://www.digiloguemuseum.com/index.html
Emulator: https://sites.google.com/site/capex86/
Raytracer: https://sites.google.com/site/opaqueraytracer/

Reply 15 of 27, by badmojo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Scali wrote:

Falcon 3.0 had an enhanced mode if you had an FPU.

You learn something new every day, I always thought it was just CAD, etc that used it during the 486 era.

Life? Don't talk to me about life.

Reply 16 of 27, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Buying a 387SX/DX benefited Falcon 3.0 over a 386SX/DX as well.

vladstamate wrote:

You might be able to run with 4Mb only.

Quake requires 8mb minimum as well as a FPU. elainda ran it on a 387 once.

Last edited by leileilol on 2018-02-01, 22:11. Edited 1 time in total.

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 17 of 27, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
derSammler wrote:

Normally, yes. No PC after the XT had to know by a jumper/switch whether an FPU is present or not.

Not true, I have 486 boards that have SX/DX jumpers.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 18 of 27, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Show please. And what happens when setting the jumper wrong? Since the FPU is internal and can not even be switched off, what the heck are those jumpers supposed to do anyway? They may just alter the CPU detection string...

Reply 19 of 27, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
derSammler wrote:

Show please. And what happens when setting the jumper wrong? Since the FPU is internal and can not even be switched off, what the heck are those jumpers supposed to do anyway? They may just alter the CPU detection string...

Perhaps this is one of those boards where the 486SX is soldered on the board, and there is a '487' socket? In which case the jumper selects whether the board uses the 486SX or the 487 in the socket?

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/