VOGONS


Another (but my first) 98 / XP / 7 build

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 25, by bitzu101

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
KoRni wrote on 2026-07-25, 18:15:
Well, that's exactly my point - Solo-1 might be the best PCI sound card for pure DOS, but does it present any value for me in DO […]
Show full quote
bitzu101 wrote on 2026-07-23, 15:09:
ESS Solo 1 does NOT need SB link to work in DDMA. […]
Show full quote

ESS Solo 1 does NOT need SB link to work in DDMA.

You need windows 98 , and the VXD driver. It will even say on boot that the DDMA mode is XXXXXXXXX....

The ESS Solo 1 is by far the best sound card fow dos on the PCI bus. It has opl 3 hardware and the AudioDrive is supported by most games.

For pure dos sound , yes , you do need ISA. but do you really want it? Why would you launch the games from pure dos instead of win 9x?

Well, that's exactly my point - Solo-1 might be the best PCI sound card for pure DOS, but does it present any value for me in DOS-under-W98? "I'm keeping the focus on DOS under W98, W98, XP and early W7". I'm asking this because I already have the card and I'm considering getting rid of it.
Even if I'd like to explore the pure DOS approach, for DDMA I would still need specific chipset motherboard, which is out of my plan. If I'm to keep my DOS-under-W98 approach, wouldn't my choice of Yamaha WF192XG * still be better? I mean - it's Yamaha card, can there be any better for OPL3? Besides, it also supports Sensaura stuff. So, according to my knowledge, WF192XG vs Solo-1 in DOS-under-W98 is a clear win for WF192XG - but maybe I'm missing something, that's why I'm asking you guys.

* - plus Diamond Monster MX300 - this one isn't going anywhere, no matter what other choices I make, because of Aureal 3D

ESS Solo 1 and Yamaha 724 are best in class for DOS under WIN9x. Both have hardware opl3. Sound Blaster compatibility is excellent.

The 2 above are the best , but under win9x , most sound cards of the era will work with no problem. I mean , i ve said on other posts , there is 0 reason (besides nostalgia) to run dos games under dos. it s a waste of time. 99% of people use win 9x because is more convenient and the game is EXACTLY the same.

The beauty is that under win 9x , there a way more options of sound cards... way more... aureal , ensoniq , live 5.1 , ess maestro , canyon , etc... I have a collection of about 10 cards for PCI... all for win 9x and xp era. till now , i ve not experinced a game that would not run under win 9x with any of my cards... including a3d 2 , ess maestro , yamaha 724 , etc... my least favourite card on PCI is SB live 5.1 (selling it) , it uses 2 IRQ's and brings nothing to the table except EAX for witch i don t care too much because i have audigy 2 zs , a3d 2 , etc...

Reply 21 of 25, by such

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Some games tend to be crashy, so hardly a waste of time if you're playing a ton of DOS. Plus, there's good ol' Ultima 7.

It's a no-brainer for me, personally. Tolerances vary.

Reply 22 of 25, by bitzu101

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
such wrote on 2026-07-25, 23:18:

Some games tend to be crashy, so hardly a waste of time if you're playing a ton of DOS. Plus, there's good ol' Ultima 7.

It's a no-brainer for me, personally. Tolerances vary.

Never had an issue with any dos game under windows. Not now , not back in the days of win 95...

But hey ho... different experiences. As you can see , my favourite game ever is X com apocalypse. that is a dos game. and it s a game that is very particular about the sound. I run it with my ESS Solo 1 under windows 9x , 0 problems. Same with my yamaha 724.

Reply 23 of 25, by KoRni

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thanks for clarification and it actually confirms my findings. Emulation can be tricky, but W98 doesn't emulate anything - it is DOS with a GUI and few modern-at-that-time solutions. Yes, few very old games might still have issues, but there's no way to cover all game eras with a single machine, and unlocking full compatibility with these few games (i.e. having a board with ISA slot and proper sound card), would strongly limit compatibility with newer ones.
I will still try to test Solo-1 and compare to WF192XG, but I'm pretty sure I will just keep the later.

Reply 24 of 25, by bitzu101

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
KoRni wrote on 2026-07-31, 06:58:

Thanks for clarification and it actually confirms my findings. Emulation can be tricky, but W98 doesn't emulate anything - it is DOS with a GUI and few modern-at-that-time solutions. Yes, few very old games might still have issues, but there's no way to cover all game eras with a single machine, and unlocking full compatibility with these few games (i.e. having a board with ISA slot and proper sound card), would strongly limit compatibility with newer ones.
I will still try to test Solo-1 and compare to WF192XG, but I'm pretty sure I will just keep the later.

Both good cards are good. I preffer the ESS over anything. But that is just me... I have a soft spot for the SOLO 1 - think i have about 5 of them , just in case the world runs out of them 😀)

In reality , if you launch the games from win9x , most cards will work as most cards will have SB emulation. Also , some games can use the Microsoft Sound System as well , meaning that if you hear a sound in win 9x , then the dos game will play with sound as well.

Reply 25 of 25, by zapbuzz

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

When it comes to retro computers I don't use the same computer with DOS or DOS based and NT.