VOGONS


What retro activity did you get up to today?

Topic actions

Reply 30060 of 30063, by StriderTR

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
dominusprog wrote on Today, 15:45:

Guys, is there a patch/update for Windows95 on supporting the Cyrix 6x86 processors?

You mean so WIn95 sees it as something other than a 486? I don't believe so, but I may be wrong.

If I recall correctly, the 6x86 was Win95 certified by Microsoft at the time, but because it was released after Windows 95, the identification routine incorrectly labels it a 486 based on how the CPU responds to the query. I don't remember there being any issues becasue of it, but again, that was a long time ago and I may be misremembering. I had a 6x86 running Windows 95 back then, before moving to a Pentium, and I don't recall any issues specific to the 6x86.

Builds: https://theclassicgeek.blogspot.com/
3D Prints: https://www.thingiverse.com/classicgeek/collections
Wallpapers: https://www.deviantart.com/theclassicgeek
AI: https://creator.nightcafe.studio/u/StriderTR

Reply 30061 of 30063, by douglar

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
dominusprog wrote on Today, 15:45:

Guys, is there a patch/update for Windows95 on supporting the Cyrix 6x86 processors?

There was a patch for Cyrix 6x86 Microprocessors
https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarchive/id/win95x/
https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarchive/kb/156/Q156437/

I think it was rolled into Windows OSR 2 (aka Win95b) along with a lot of other good stuff, so maybe just run Windows 95b ?

Edit -- The win95 patch was mostly cosmetic. Windows NT had bigger issues

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/bananas,9.html

Reply 30062 of 30063, by dominusprog

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
StriderTR wrote on Today, 16:44:
dominusprog wrote on Today, 15:45:

Guys, is there a patch/update for Windows95 on supporting the Cyrix 6x86 processors?

You mean so WIn95 sees it as something other than a 486? I don't believe so, but I may be wrong.

If I recall correctly, the 6x86 was Win95 certified by Microsoft at the time, but because it was released after Windows 95, the identification routine incorrectly labels it a 486 based on how the CPU responds to the query. I don't remember there being any issues becasue of it, but again, that was a long time ago and I may be misremembering. I had a 6x86 running Windows 95 back then, before moving to a Pentium, and I don't recall any issues specific to the 6x86.

Some drivers like AWE64 installer or games like NFS2 detect the processor as a 486. So it'll be nice if Windows detects it correctly.

douglar wrote on Today, 16:48:
There was a patch for Cyrix 6x86 Microprocessors https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarchive/id/win95x/ https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarch […]
Show full quote
dominusprog wrote on Today, 15:45:

Guys, is there a patch/update for Windows95 on supporting the Cyrix 6x86 processors?

There was a patch for Cyrix 6x86 Microprocessors
https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarchive/id/win95x/
https://jeffpar.github.io/kbarchive/kb/156/Q156437/

I think it was rolled into Windows OSR 2 (aka Win95b) along with a lot of other good stuff, so maybe just run Windows 95b ?

Edit -- The win95 patch was mostly cosmetic. Windows NT had bigger issues

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/bananas,9.html

Yes, thank you. The Q156437 is what that I was looking for 🙂.

Duke_2600.png
A-Trend ATC-1020 V1.1 ❇ Cyrix 6x86 150+ @ 120MHz ❇ 32MiB EDO RAM (8MiBx4) ❇ A-Trend S3 Trio64V2 2MiB
Creative AWE64 Value ❇ 8.4GiB Quantum Fireball ❇ Win95 OSR2 Plus!