AlexZ wrote on Yesterday, 12:48:Post 3d mark 99 scores for 800x600x16bit and 1024x768x32bit […]
Show full quote
Post 3d mark 99 scores for 800x600x16bit and 1024x768x32bit
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/riva-tnt2-m64.c1304
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/asus-v9180-se.b1859
ASUS V9180 SE is at least 2x faster than NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64, despite being a cheap 64bit model.
The next possible upgrade is GeForce FX 5200 or 5500, which is about 2x faster than GeForce MX4 440.
In a perfect world, maybe, but on a P3, there is still a pretty significant CPU limiting factor.
If you use just about any video card released after 1999, 3d mark 99 is mainly a CPU benchmark. A geforce MX is going to benchmark really close to a radeon 9800 pro.
On an 800Mhz P3, 3dmark 2000 & quake 3, all benchmark within 10% for a Geforce 2, Geforce MX family, and Geforce FX5200 as long as they had at least 128 bit SDR or 64 bit DDR memory. They seemed to be substantially CPU limited. But if you get a gimpy 64bit SDR or 32 bit DDR MX card things will be ~30% slower.
With a faster CPU like a Barton 2500+, the Geforce 2 card starts to pull ahead in 3dmark 2000, and both the Geforce 2 and the FX5200 were about 50% faster in Quake 3.
download/file.php?id=229021&mode=view