VOGONS


Battle of the platforms: socket 754!

Topic actions

Reply 800 of 802, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

No the problem occurs even at base clock 2Ghz for ML-37. Difference in behaviour at 2.0, 2.2, 2.4Ghz is just a timing issue being exposed. You need very rigorous testing at multiple CPU frequencies to confirm CR1 is stable.

Right now I'm trying 1x Kingston HyperX 1GB and 1x OCZ Platinum 1GB DDR400 together. CR1 may work with 2x Corsair or 2x OCZ Platinum, but I don't have those.

Pentium III 900E,ECS P6BXT-A+,384MB,GeForce FX 5600, Voodoo 2,Yamaha SM718
Turion 64 ML-37@2.4Ghz,Gigabyte GA-K8NE,2GB,GeForce GTX 275,Audigy 2ZS
Phenom II X4 955,Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3,8GB,GeForce GTX 780
Vishera FX-8370,Asus 990FX,32GB,GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Reply 801 of 802, by Madowax

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

The IMC is very timings dependent, even stock timings might not be a good choice for a particular core revision and CR1 is even more difficult, sometimes a little ram overvolt might help a lot .

Mixing different brands with the same memory ICs may work, while same brand with different memoy ICs may not work stable at all.

Reply 802 of 802, by Kruton 9000

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

In the mid-2000s, it was common knowledge that socket 754 processors needed to be overclocked with a single memory module to reduce the load on the memory controller.
The quality of the memory itself isn't the issue; the weak point in this case is the processors themselves. AMD positioned this platform as a budget platform, planning for socket 939, which was released much later, making socket 754 the default platform for the time, while remaining budget-oriented by design.