Looks promising. But what about multi-threaded stuff and real life power consumption...

1Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2
3Total Cores: 24 Cores, 24 Threads
4
5Performance Cores: 8 Cores, 8 Threads, 3.7 GHz Base, 5.7 GHz Turbo
6
7Efficient Cores: 16 Cores, 16 Threads, 3.2 GHz Base, 4.6 GHz Turbo
8
9Typical TDP:
10125 W

Max TDP/MTP appears to be 250W (according to articles apparently quoting Intel).

Also https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-admits-core … 4900k-in-gaming

1Intel Core i9-14900KS
2
3Total Cores: 24 Cores, 32 Threads
4
5Performance Cores: 8 Cores, 16 Threads, 3.2 GHz Base, 6.2 GHz Turbo
6
7Efficient Cores: 16 Cores, 16 Threads, 2.4 GHz Base, 4.5 GHz Turbo
8
9Typical TDP:
10150 W
11
12TDP Up
13: 253 W

So, higher IPC, more efficient, but slower in highly multithreaded workloads as more efficient cores than performance ones, possibly due to no multithreading hyperthreading.

What about real software instead of synthetic benchmarks? I still don't know why so many people treat Passmark as the only true indicator of CPU performance.

Intel still has to regain trust (not just due to the CPU failures, but annoying architecture flaws like the latency problem).

lti wrote on 2024-10-09, 01:43:

What about real software instead of synthetic benchmarks? I still don't know why so many people treat Passmark as the only true indicator of CPU performance.

Intel still has to regain trust (not just due to the CPU failures, but annoying architecture flaws like the latency problem).

If you have some links to share with those, please do.

I am just waiting for Qualcomm to really buy them out...

Bruninho wrote on 2024-10-09, 16:40:

I am just waiting for Qualcomm to really buy them out...

Yeah, might be nice but I don't see it actually ever happening.
I'm pretty sure Qualcomm would need their own agreement with AMD for the x86/x64 license if they intended to manufacture those chips.....and AMD isn't likely to do that.
Plus with Intel's hooks being so deeply embedded in the United States government sector, the government won't allow it to happen.
Kind of like how General Motors wasn't allowed to die.

But still, it's a nice dream to think of Intel getting their just desserts.
Not that I really want them to die or be acquired, but it is nice to see them squirm a bit.

Is it April, and no one told me?

And this looks like the OP was before the complete and utter fubar that happened with 13 & 14th gen cpu's hitting the crapper due to flaws.

Closed annoying thread.