First post, by elianda
- Rank
- l33t
I recently bought a VGA framegrabber card and used it right away to record some video from my retro PCs.
I put some of them up on my ftp site. Try to view in original video resolution or it will get unsharp like on a TFT with non-native resolution.
This is a bootup from one of my 386DX-40 from BIOS to WfW 3.11 using a Dual Monitor configuration with a ET4000 / N9 GXiTC. So in the beginning you see the textmode screen from the ET4000 and after the windows boot logo vanishes the N9 card takes over in 1280x1024 16 bit color accelerated.
ftp://78.47.153.163/video/bootup.avi
same PC running Wintune2: ftp://78.47.153.163/video/wintune.avi
This is the same PC (386DX-40) running Tritons Crystal Dream 2 using GUS (ofcourse):
ftp://78.47.153.163/video/crystal_dream_2.mkv
edit: I fixed the aspect ratio issues.
lower quality youtube video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XFI9uUbawo
After this recording I found out that my other 386DX-40 is a bit faster in the chessboard scene...
A quite rare Demo video, this is Smash Designs first PC demo called 1st Demo II. It uses a Voodoo2 / GUS in DOS:
ftp://78.47.153.163/video/first_demo2_hq.avi
(640x480 resolution, runs on a Slot A Athlon 650 MHz)
I also did a short video how fast Firefox 2.0.0.20 runs on my P166MMX in NT4 with Taskmanager open to see memory usage.
ftp://78.47.153.163/video/ff2.avi
(1280x1024 resolution)
and finally some recording from an Amiga, it's the beginning of the Turrican 2 intro:
ftp://78.47.153.163/video/turrican2.avi
Looks like the Grabber card is able to grab also this signal.
From my first impression the quality is very nice, with a bit adjustments it can be synced such that the input pixels are identical with the video pixels to get a sharp representation. (see f.e. the FF2 video)
As soon as I get an adapter I will also try if the cards grabs a signal from a C128.
So what do you think?