Overclocking an AMD K6-2/300 \ VOGONS

Overclocking an AMD K6-2/300

Topic actions

Post a reply

First post, by Half-Saint

Posted on 2013-12-13, 22:09

Half-Saint Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 874
Joined: 2013-07-26, 04:27
Location: Slovenia

I decided to see how fast I could go with my Super Socket 7 rig. Originally it was setup as 4x 66 and it worked fine. Switching to 3x 100 and 3.5 x 100 worked as well. 4x 100... not so well 😀 I settled for 4.5x 83MHz for a stable 372MHz overclock.

Now the questions:
1) Which is faster: 3.5x 100 or 4.5x 83?
- I know that higher FSB should be faster but I'm guessing there shouldn't be much difference between the two.
2) What's a good benchmarking software for comparison?
3) Is it normal for Windows 98 to take 2 minutes to load? 😀

Reply 1 of 8, by mwdmeyer

Posted on 2013-12-13, 23:48

mwdmeyer Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 438
Joined: 2012-03-06, 11:35
Location: Sydney, Australia

The issue with the K6/2 is that the L2 cache is external and is limited by the FSB, so I would think that the 100MHz FSB would be faster. No idea by how much though. 😀

Vogons Wiki - http://vogonswiki.com

Reply 2 of 8, by Nahkri

Posted on 2013-12-14, 08:02

Nahkri Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 433
Joined: 2013-02-10, 21:23
Location: Karlsburg:RO

I'd say use 100mhz fsb,the overall performance of the pc should be better,have u tried increasing voltage to keep it stable at 4x100?

Mb:JetWay 542C Ali Aladdin 5
Pr:Amd K6-3+:400MHZ @ 550 mhz
Ram:256mb
3D:Voodoo 3 3000 16MB
Sound:Turtle Beach-Montego A3dExtreme(Aureal Vortex 1)
Hdd:Maxtor Fireball Plus 8 40g,7200rpm,2mb cache
Os:Windows 98SE

Reply 3 of 8, by Half-Saint

Posted on 2013-12-14, 11:55

Half-Saint Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 874
Joined: 2013-07-26, 04:27
Location: Slovenia

Increased voltage by 0.1 V and was able to boot into Windows at 400Mhz. Now to do some stability testing...

Reply 4 of 8, by noshutdown

Posted on 2013-12-14, 15:36

noshutdown Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 1146
Joined: 2010-07-23, 17:04
Location: China

my vote goes to 100*3.5 too. but why would you bother messing with that cpu? can't you get a k6-2 rated at 500/550 or even k6-2+ with ease?

Reply 5 of 8, by Half-Saint

Posted on 2013-12-14, 18:42

Half-Saint Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 874
Joined: 2013-07-26, 04:27
Location: Slovenia

Yes I gues I could but where's fun in that? 😀

Reply 6 of 8, by nforce4max

Posted on 2013-12-14, 22:03

nforce4max Offline

Rank l33t

Rank: l33t
Posts: 2452
Joined: 2012-05-05, 22:55

When it comes to SS7 higher the fsb the better.

On a far away planet reading your posts in the year 10,191.

Reply 7 of 8, by Half-Saint

Posted on 2013-12-14, 22:12

Half-Saint Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 874
Joined: 2013-07-26, 04:27
Location: Slovenia

Hrm, why does CPUZ show no info on L2 cache? Is it because it's not on dye?

Reply 8 of 8, by sliderider

Posted on 2013-12-15, 01:17

sliderider Offline

Rank l33t++

Rank: l33t++
Posts: 5764
Joined: 2010-06-25, 13:02

Why overclock, when faster K6-2 and K6-III chips are still cheap?

Go to top of page Go to top of page

Back to General Old Hardware

Main menu

Common searches