All the ladies are here: https://archive.org/details/nzd_backup Nice finding, but still Nalu's missing, despite being half fish rather than a lady :D And here it is: https://archive.org/details/nvidia_demo_nalu It's not missing, it's been archived from Nvidia's website by Web Archive: https://www. …

nuninho wrote on 2023-10-04, 09:14: BEEN_Nath_58 wrote on 2023-10-03, 19:29: I have appended your post to my first post Or check to click "EXE (327MB)*" for fast download - https://gpuopen.com/archived/radeon-hd-4800-s … eal-time-demos/ BTW how did you reach that page? What link did you follow? I …

My apologies 😔 But no there's no solution. It's not an error in your end. As said in one if the previous posts it's because of a feature AMD gives and Nvidia doesn't. You can compare it to trying a DLSS demo on AMD (you'll get an error) Yeah. :( But it's possible we can run HD 4800 demo on NVIDIA …

I didn't find the demo to download, but I know it exists. Links I tried appear to be dead. Could you help with getting that in some way? From your next post it appears you have found it eventually, but in case you haven't, check the link for "ATI/AMD Radeon demos, part 2 (Radeon HD 3000 to Radeon …

Set your card as the ATI Radeon card from the dgVoodoo2 panel. Still, if dgVooodoo2 can't do hardware tessellation (either Direct3D 11 or AMD's custom API extensions), it most likely won't work, because hardware tesselation seems like a hard requirement for that software. Now that I am thinking of …

Hello. I've a new GeForce RTX 4090. :D I tried to use dgVoodoo2 for add Radeon HD 4800 Froblins and for change VRAM to 512MB and to run this demo... but I got in SushiLog.txt file: === Sushi 3.1 Build 300 (Compiled on May 12 2009 18:38:10) [11:02:56] Unable to get audio driver name: No errors. [11: …

For those of us who prefer downloading executables from first-party sources, I found out that the Nvidia and ATI/AMD Radeon demos are surprisingly well-archived in Web Archive. Nvidia demos: Page: http://web.archive.org/web/20200921115422/https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/community/demos/ …

The funny thing is this thing actually happened. There was a chip called the Lucid Hydra 200 that allowed the user to combine a Nvidia card and an AMD card in multi-GPU configuration. They did it by intercepting the Direct3D calls and selectively delegating them to each GPU. It goes without saying …

The funny thing is this thing actually happened. There was a chip called the Lucid Hydra 200 that allowed the user to combine a Nvidia card and an AMD card in multi-GPU configuration. They did it by intercepting the Direct3D calls and selectively delegating them to each GPU. It goes without saying …

Make sure you are viewing the image at its original size (1280x960). The problem is it adds a "hard" fuzzy edge to everything, which makes it look as if it's out of focus. A standard bilinear resize (which is what is actually used in the video industry - it's the default resampling algorithm on all …

I tried implementing this to see what it looked like, the answer: bloody terrible. Don't stare at it too long or you'll feel like you need glasses. This is why a proper bilinear 2x resize uses alternating weights of 0.75/0.25 instead of 1.0/0.5. How is this terrible? It preserves all image data …

For quite a while, I have been using the "normal2x" scaler (along with ddraw output) to scale my 640*480 games to 1280*960 (windowresolution is set to this resolution in the settings). This is effectively results in 2x scaling by line repeat, which is a decent scaling option in my opinion (it …

Those of us still using 32bit CPUs theoretically have the advantage of being able to run DOS games without the need for a virtualizer or a full emulator. But i haven't come across a single decent Virtual8086-based DOS emulator for Windows 7. This sentence really doesn't make any sense. Perhaps you …

Again, 3D Game or not, there's no emulator capable of outperforming DosBox. This is what i find perplexing. How its possible for a full emulator (DOSBox) to beat a virtualizer (VirtualBox) in terms of performance? Books say that virtualizers (VirtualBox) beat full emulators (DOSBox) in terms of …

Since you two cant understand a polite request, here is an impolite one: Stop bitching about the damn avatar here. Take it elsewhere or shut your pie holes now. If anyone wants to recommend a Virtual8086-based DOS emulator though, or knows whether i should use DOSBox or VirtualBox to run 3D DOS …

Topic people.

swaaye wrote: does VDMSound work on 32bit Vista/7? No, fullscreen support for 16-bit dos apps has been scrapped in 32bit Vista/7. I was hoping for a Virtual8086 -based DOS emulator that doesn't rely on NTVDM.

Are there any? Those of us still using 32bit CPUs theoretically have the advantage of being able to run DOS games without the need for a virtualizer or a full emulator. But i haven't come across a single decent Virtual8086-based DOS emulator for Windows 7. Also, for 64bit CPUs, should i use Virtual …