Re: Compiling Hal's Dosbox MB5 under Ubuntu?
Posted on 2009-10-01, 05:54
What gcc version are you using? It may just missing some header that was previously included indirectly, try adding #include or so.
Re: dosbox color bug
Posted on 2009-10-01, 05:52
One last time: on WHICH OS DID YOU ACTUALLY TEST THIS?
Re: dosbox color bug
Posted on 2009-09-30, 22:14
He said it applies to win31 as well, and somebody trying to run dosbox in that "OS" is screwed anyways, left aside using a pallettized video mode.
Re: dosbox color bug
Posted on 2009-09-30, 21:50
People he is NOT talking about his host OS being windows (afaict) thus this thread is as useless as the first one, still entertaining.
Re: Run a DOS application directly from windows
Posted on 2009-09-30, 10:57
himem.sys is not required, as DOSBox has its own superior EMS driver. himem provides XMS only (also present in dosbox by default), but of course the dosbox EMS implementation is fucking superior ;) Essentially if the application hangs both in XP's command line as well as in dosbox, you're missing …
Re: Game Too Fast
Posted on 2009-09-30, 07:40
Please read the VERY FIRST reply in this thread, as well as all the other notes that tell you that you should use a FIXED cycle count.
Re: Backslash key does not work
Posted on 2009-09-29, 21:26
And why didn't you read the README?
Re: bug referal for dosbox
Posted on 2009-09-29, 17:29
I don't see where i was grumpy, but a bug report missing the host OS and the dosbox version is completely useless to me.
Re: bug referal for dosbox
Posted on 2009-09-29, 05:37
And why do you think anybody would care about a bug report where neither the OS, the dosbox version or ANYTHING of use is mentioned?
Re: Emulate PC Speaker with Soundcard
Posted on 2009-09-27, 22:15
Yeah could be.
Re: Emulate PC Speaker with Soundcard
Posted on 2009-09-27, 21:55
The file name is at the top of the patch's block, for the exact location check the comments around the unchanged lines.
Re: Compiling for 64-bit Windows
Posted on 2009-09-27, 20:51
For me x86 to x86 is direct dynamic recompilation, everything else is more complex and less performant like x86 to x64 recompilation. So yes, it is possible (like under linux 64bit recompilation is working fine) but will not reach the speed of the x86 to x86 approach.
Re: Compiling for 64-bit Windows
Posted on 2009-09-27, 19:23
Not really as the direct recompilation is still much faster.
Re: Compiling for 64-bit Windows
Posted on 2009-09-27, 18:09
The recompiler doesn't work under 64bit windows so you can disable it through configure parameters, and the aspi interface should not be used as well (just hack around that). The _WIN32_IE thing is some mingw header strangeness but i don't remember if i've ever properly worked around that. Your hack …
Re: DOSBox autoexec configuration
Posted on 2009-09-27, 13:08
choice /c:123 and checking errorlevel or something like that
Re: DOSBox autoexec configuration
Posted on 2009-09-27, 12:44
set /p is not valid under msdos.
Re: DOSBox autoexec configuration
Posted on 2009-09-27, 11:45
dosbox version? OS?
Re: bug referal for dosbox
Posted on 2009-09-27, 08:17
I read the link before posting. And why do you think anybody would care about a bug report where neither the OS, the dosbox version or ANYTHING of use is mentioned?
Re: Willing to pay 100 dollars
Posted on 2009-09-26, 22:05
Its also a real challenge for the experts here. No but it's a challenge for you network's responsiveness.
Re: Wing Commander 2 Deluxe Crashing
Posted on 2009-09-26, 22:03
Install the game correctly, then post full information about how you installed it and how you're running it. loadfix is supposed to be run as standalone app before executing the game's executable.
Page 100 of 445