VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: DOSBox-X branch

SedrynTyros, could you remove my email address, please? Malicious spam bots circulating on the web can collect the address, making me hard to keep junk mail out of my inbox. Few years ago, I replaced the plain text with an image on my website to prevent the situation. I do not have my own source …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Quick question while I consider changes from other branches: I know ykhwong has a source tarball to download on his site. Does he have a svn or git repository I can read from? It helps to merge changes when I can go through the commits in the other branches one by one. I don't think he does. You …

Re: DOSBOX / Android / Win3.1 sound problem

Following the Win3.1 on dosbox guide, using http://androiddosbox.appspot.com/ 0.2.5 - later than the appstore version of this. Win3.1 installed ok, but the sound install does not find a soundcard at any of the base addresses. The environment has BLASTER A220 I7 D1 T3 Am I doing something wrong, or …

Re: Anybody know what happened to truth5678?

It's a bit sad to see him go, he was quite the contributor. No kidding, huh? He was great. A good balance between technical know-how and a perspective on how less technical people would want to use DOSBox. I was about to propose a minor collaboration with him wherein I'd work on compiling regular …

Anybody know what happened to truth5678?

I was PMing with him about custom DOSBox builds and I went to check to see if my last message this morning I sent went out okay when *poof* his vogons forum account is now showing as deleted. And now it looks like his page at http://www.si-gamer.net/truth/ is down as well. Does anybody know what …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

truth5678 wrote: but in that case I removed all menu code since there is no linewise option. Hey Truth5678, would it be too much trouble for you to create a .diff patch that would remove the menu code in the most recent DOSBox-X source?

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Try applying this patch after applying scaling_gl.diff: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=36406. Egads, I forgot about that patch you created!! It was back before I taught myself the basics of how to compile code; I'm still very much a novice in that regard but I'll give these patches a …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Could you test the functionality of Mode X scaling in the major builds? I tested ddraw modes but less of Mode X. It may be interesting to know which games access those modes and how well they work. In Quake 2, at least the version I tested, it seemed that Mode X was a fallback if a particular ddraw …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

I am currently working on additional patches to dosbox-x in response to your requests. To start, here is the opengl scaling patch with notes: "Patch is attached to reactivate opengl mode along with window and full screen scaling. Requires testing in other systems since I only tested it in a build …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

The opengl issue is because some code was removed from dosbox-x. In response to your issue, here are instructions to apply the opengl scaling code to dosbox-x: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=31881&start=700#p380279. Oh, so the OpenGL scaling in DOSBox-X was an improvement over the …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

It's removed from configure script only as a single section of contiguous lines. The patch contains this removed section, so it is simple to add those lines back and then build. However, there are additional requirements to build with the d3d patch, and it is not required to run dosbox-x. Gotcha. …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Attached a patch (**) to allow MinGW32 to build the recent dosbox-x (12/29/14). Instructions (requires MinGW32/gcc and SDL library; same as for for vanilla dosbox) 1. patch -p1 < dosbox-x-MinGW32.diff 2. ./autogen.sh 3. LDFLAGS="-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++" ./configure --enable-core-inline 4. …

Re: Correction in DOSBox-r3873-mt32 patch

Tried patching the DOSBox SVN r3885 source with dosbox-SVN-r3873-mt32-patch.diff and there's now some drift when it patches dosbox.cpp: "Hunk#1 succeeded at 491 (offset 8 lines)." "Hunk#2 succeeded at 507 (offset 8 lines)." It still works, though; this is just an FYI. When I tried patched DOSBox SVN …

Re: DOSBox-X branch

exofreeze wrote: Since Win95 does not use an autoexec.bat and config.sys, I can't really use that step... yet Win95 doesn't seem to detect it on it's own. Actually, Windows 95 uses both config.sys and autoexec.bat during boot time.

Page 3 of 7