VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: PC-DOS 7 Memory Tricks

in DOS
Not trying to batter Keropi with PC-DOS 2000, but can't you still overall save memory by loading command.com high? You have no umb, but given ibmdos takes only about 19k, I'm guessing you have high memory. Loading something 'high' refers to putting it in UMBs, not in the HMA. The latter is …

Re: PC-DOS 7 Memory Tricks

in DOS
That agrees with my results. I don't know what he has different; it seems 7.0 and 2000 are the same in this respect. I haven't heard of PC-DOS 7.1 having LFN support. It was never even completed, so it couldn't (because all utilities have to be recompiled to allow long filenames).

Re: PC-DOS 7 Memory Tricks

in DOS
Well, I was just going on the memory usage I find (with 7.0) relative to what you showed. DOS normally is pretty much system-independent so I'm not sure why you get different results. Maybe 2000 uses more than 7.0, or there's something different with your HMA usage (without an HMA at all of course …

Re: DOSBox for old applications

What I mean by 'worth less than nothing' - which is not true of DOSBox, even for me - is that you would have been better off not getting it, even though you paid nothing. For example, if you take a lot of time trying to set up a program, only to find out that it will not work for you anyway, you're …

Re: PC-DOS 7 Memory Tricks

in DOS
Yes, 7.0 gets you about 3K more even without UMBs. It is targeted to help even more with UMBs, though, by loading COMMAND and part of IBMDOS high, and reaches 629K out of 640K free, probably the highest of any DOS. Does UMBPCI even work at all on your board?

Re: DOSBox for old applications

Without knowing what the application is, obviously there's no way to comment on its use. Perhaps you don't specify because you're afraid it would get the thread locked? (Which I suppose is not unreasonable given the history here.) As far as I know normal DOS applications, I mean the kind you are …

Re: PC-DOS 7 Memory Tricks

in DOS
Yes, PC-DOS 7 was specifically optimised for maximum conventional memory available, and surely is the best of the classic DOSes for this and other reasons. It was a dead end though as IBM decided to stop competing with Microsoft in the OS field after Win95, more or less. If you're running a classic …

Re: Best Doom 1 & 2 config?

Well, I should have omitted the word 'the' - I was referring to copy protection in general, not in SQ6. Are you able to write a real or virtual CD that it will run off? If you have the files from SQ Collection, and they're still in the original directory structure, it should be easy.

Page 1 of 6