VOGONS

Search

Common searches

Search results

Display options

Display options

SoundBlaster Live! with no directsound

Posted on 2019-06-01, 23:07

I´m trying to have sound in game through directsound in hardware mode with no avail. Tried a Live 5.1 Digital and a Live! Value with same results. Directsound only works through software mode, selected in dxdiag. The board is a DFI P2XBL with an PIII 550Mhz . Tried some diferent drivers. Sound cards …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-12, 16:18

I don't think the 555 drivers have a TGL included (the 530 and 541 do though). The 1.3 TGL has its own installer. You can get the TGL here https://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/support/drivers/previous/display2/#OpenGL Ok then. What driver version do you recommend for the G400 series in W9x? And needs …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-11, 20:44

Here are some stock and OC results on my G400Max. Both running the 555 driver with the 1.3 TurboGL. The G400 at stock clocks: g400sys.png g40032.png and OCed: g400ocsys.png g400oc32.png Is the 1.3 TurboGL included in the 5.55 driver? Is that the final driver with TurboGL? How does the TurboGL …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-09, 11:59

Here is my Geforce256 SDR on the same OR840 setup: p3gfsys.png q3gfsdr3082.png Very good fps for the GF256 SDR. Can you do another benchmark with Trilinear filtering enabled? My V5 5500 on a PIII Coop 866Mhz scored only 51.7fps @1024x768 with Trilinear filtering on, and the TNT2 Ultra is scoring …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-09, 11:56

Here are some stock and OC results on my G400Max. Both running the 555 driver with the 1.3 TurboGL. The G400 at stock clocks: g400sys.png g40032.png and OCed: g400ocsys.png g400oc32.png I really need to try the 5.55 drivers. Turbo GL seems to help Quake 3 performance. Interesting to see that the …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-09, 11:54

cxm717 wrote: rcarkk wrote: Is the card overclocked with those 160/166Mhz settings? Nope. The card was running stock clocks. Here are some pics of the card https://imgur.com/a/jR9lfNo Looks like it´s even faster than the Savage 4 Extreme. Rare card.

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-06, 09:17

I tried Q3 on a 32MB Rage 128pro and 16MB Savage4 in my OR840/P3800/512MB 800 RDRAM system. First the Rage: p3r128psys.png q3rage128p6292.png And the Savage4: s3s4ep3sys.png s3s4eq3.png Great results for your Savage 4. Your card is running stock at 160/166Mhz on GPU/RAM. That´s very fast and much …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-06, 09:15

Here is my Geforce256 SDR on the same OR840 setup: p3gfsys.png q3gfsdr3082.png Very good fps for the GF256 SDR. Can you do another benchmark with Trilinear filtering enabled? My V5 5500 on a PIII Coop 866Mhz scored only 51.7fps @1024x768 with Trilinear filtering on, and the TNT2 Ultra is scoring …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-05, 15:33

I thought it was fairly interesting how close the results I got with the VIA P4M266 IGP (ProSavgeDDR, Savage 4 based IGP from 2001/2002) are to the TnT 16MB, the CPU is not the same but I doubt it's having much of an impact with this level of IGP, (and the northwood Celeron is incredibly slow for …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-05, 15:32

I tried Q3 on a 32MB Rage 128pro and 16MB Savage4 in my OR840/P3800/512MB 800 RDRAM system. First the Rage: p3r128psys.png q3rage128p6292.png And the Savage4: s3s4ep3sys.png s3s4eq3.png Great results for your Savage 4. Your card is running stock at 160/166Mhz on GPU/RAM. That´s very fast and much …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-04, 17:15

I thought it was fairly interesting how close the results I got with the VIA P4M266 IGP (ProSavgeDDR, Savage 4 based IGP from 2001/2002) are to the TnT 16MB, the CPU is not the same but I doubt it's having much of an impact with this level of IGP, (and the northwood Celeron is incredibly slow for …

Re: Asus PCI-AV264VT question.

Posted on 2019-05-04, 12:25

I think this card has it's collecting value tbh. I posted this card on Facebook groups and i had two users asking if i could sell it. In the mean time, i tested it on a PCI slot, and the graphics are working. Maybe it has its value. I bought it for collection, because its a nice uncommon card.

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-03, 17:48

My results for an Asus V3400TNT Riva TNT 16MB and one 3Dfx Voodoo 2 12MB on a Pentium III-S 1.26Ghz running on a QDI Advance 10T with Via Apollo Pro 133T and 256MB of PC133 at 2-2-2-2 timmings. Sound card is a Live! 5.1 digital and OS is Win98 SE. 21.83 + Riva TNT 16MB = 22.4fps @1024x768 16bit 21. …

Re: Quake III Arena Benchmark Thread

Posted on 2019-05-03, 10:23

My results for a Matrox G400 32MB and 2x 3Dfx Voodoo 2 12MB in SLI on a Pentium III-S 1.26Ghz running on a QDI Advance 10T with Via Apollo Pro 133T and 256MB of PC133 at 2-2-2-2 timmings. Sound card is a Live! 5.1 digital and OS is Win98 SE. 6.23 drivers + G400 @125/166Mhz = 38.1fps @16bit 6.23 …

Asus PCI-AV264VT question.

Posted on 2019-05-02, 14:49

Hello guys. I have bought this card because i never saw a multimedia card like this one with ASUS Media Bus. Does this card work only with PCI connector for graphics card functionality, leaving the other connector unused for the sound card? Is this card anything special or collectible? Does anyone …

Page 4 of 5

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Close window
Close window