Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 12:39
a version that will tell us which name it searches http://dosbox.linuxsecured.net/remcohn2.exe
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 12:28
It seems that it does a 4E:findfirst(=find file or directory) just after it creates the file 27534008: FILES:file create attributes 0 file C:\APW\00865837.TMP 27534009: CPU:Illegal/Unhandled opcode 63 dos 6866 14 exist 27534019: CPU:Illegal/Unhandled opcode 63 dos 1A28 8932 27534042: CPU:Illegal/ …
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 11:48
special debug build: http://dosbox.linuxsecured.net/remcohn.exe changes : http://dosbox.linuxsecured.net/remcohn.diff please post the log regardless wether it works. If it does work please stick around so we can determine exactly what fixed it. (and remove possible not right code)
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 11:30
wd wrote: Some stuff uses "open C:\TEST\NUL" to see if a directory exists, does that work? should work. the check for device name has special code to check leading directory for existence.
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 10:48
I'm a bit puzzled what it tries to do here. Wonder if our seek on NUL matches that of real DOS. 60723059: FILES:Special file open command C0 file NUL 60723060: CPU:Illegal/Unhandled opcode 63 60723062: PIC:0 mask F9 60723064: PIC:0 mask F8 60723064: PIC:1 mask EC 60723078: CPU:Illegal/Unhandled …
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 10:28
call 68: http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/rbinter/id/83/31.html DOSBox clears the cf. but we don't check if handle in bx is valid. call 5c: http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/rbinter/id/28/30.html we only change al to 0. We possible could give an errorcode and raise carry flag.
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 10:24
ah yes. could you for completeness sake attach the full log as well.
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 10:04
create a new configfile using that build then there is an option logfile in there.
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 09:51
currently only works with a real dos env 😉 We are always looking for those kind of bugs to improve the compatibility of DOSBox. Have you run it in the debugger version of dosbox (see dev forum) to see if some big warning pops up on an unhandled call ?
Re: Hey Qbix ..
Posted on 2008-03-19, 09:38
P.S: Is there any *good* fan-made mods to run Blood, Redneck Rampage and any 1997+ in high-resolution? Google ? TeraNova wrote: wd wrote: No. I beg to differ sir. 😀 Here on Vogons (as on most boards where other people pay the bill), it is a privilege not a right.
Re: Own dos (imgmount + boot) + virtual devices
Posted on 2008-03-19, 09:23
freesize didn't help ?
Re: Yet Another DK Gold Thread + Other DOSBox Problems!
Posted on 2008-03-19, 07:54
bad luck for you 1) 1997 is NOT really old for dosgames. In fact those are the NEW and LATEST dosgames. 2) Other people play it fine. So PEBKAC. 3) Calling dosbox shitty here on vogons isn't smart. Topic closed.
Re: Sound filled with static in Discworld II
Posted on 2008-03-19, 07:08
finally another game that is fixed by the rate up. Can you post a listing of all files of discworlkd II (+dates +size)
Re: SB IRQ
Posted on 2008-03-18, 21:07
the reason Great Hierophant is why we chose 7
Re: Boot DOS and read CD?
Posted on 2008-03-18, 19:27
which call ?
Re: DOSBox on Linux, Win32??
Posted on 2008-03-18, 19:08
unrar or unzip the exe. not sure which one is needed
Re: Sound filled with static in Discworld II
Posted on 2008-03-18, 17:53
please test if setting the samplerates in dosbox.conf to 44100 works as well
Re: Boot DOS and read CD?
Posted on 2008-03-18, 12:38
dos 5 and 6 most likely report the same. they aren't that different in the interrupt handler. think 6 just had a lot more utilities. no changed functionality. (I suspect wd to have used 6.x for testing it with mscdex) ntvdm is really totally useless when it comes to dos games. I think your "fix" …
Re: Boot DOS and read CD?
Posted on 2008-03-18, 12:02
well I don't have this game. So I can't confirm your findings. But basicly this would mean that if you are right then this game wouldn't install on a real dos pc as well. As that returns removable for a cdrom.
Re: Boot DOS and read CD?
Posted on 2008-03-18, 09:52
are you sure that that one call doesn't result in more tests being done ? (when it detects removable => do some cdrom checks (label/search for mscdex or a cdrom device/ search memory for something.)
Page 205 of 436