Re: Miss Notes?
Posted on 2005-04-18, 18:18
that's the old one http://sourceforge.net/projects/munt
Re: DOSbox joystick detection
Posted on 2005-04-15, 13:31
hmm are you using the cvs or 63 ? shouldn't matter it's odd as dosbox should return 0xff if no joystick is present. this is the code in 0.63 static Bitu read_p201(Bitu port,Bitu iolen) { /** Format of the byte to be returned: ** | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ** +-------------------------------+ …
Re: DOSbox joystick detection
Posted on 2005-04-15, 11:25
well those really old games have a joystick detection system which is incompatible with dosbox. I debugged loderunner lately to figure it out. what they do is one write to the joystick port one read. delay read again. finished. (and compares the 2 reads and if they are the same => no joystick) this …
Re: Questions about fpu
Posted on 2005-04-14, 10:12
it might be wise to submit official patches. an all in one changes patch is not likely to be accepted. small parts at a time are more likely.
Re: dos box 0.63
Posted on 2005-04-14, 07:32
hmm try selecting regular soundblaster for sound.
Re: CVS Builds By AEP
Posted on 2005-04-14, 07:30
the builds themself I don't know. Xtale attempts to do it weekly the source + log is updated twice a day from the developer cvs tree and a configure/makefile is created for the people without automake/autoconf
Re: dos box 0.63
Posted on 2005-04-13, 20:02
http://www.elderscrolls.com/tenth_anniv/Arena106%20Setup.pdf
Re: Error = CD must be in drive [Constructor]
Posted on 2005-04-13, 17:39
uhm your C must not be a -t cdrom.
Re: Any way to convert New Executable to Portable Executable?
Posted on 2005-04-13, 17:37
tried the dosbox cvs with win3.11 ? or do they need to control external stuff ?
Re: dos box 0.63
Posted on 2005-04-13, 17:36
alt 142 alt 92 are handy to know as well 😀
CVS Builds By AEP
Posted on 2005-04-13, 13:39
DOSBox AEP CVS builds: http://cvscompile.aep-emu.de/dosbox.htm Some important CVS links: DosBox CVS sources: http://dosbox.linuxdevel.net/dosboxcvs.tgz Dosbox CVS changes since the latest stable release or last major release A cvs compile with experimental patches: http://ykhwong.x-y.net/page.htm
Re: Any way to convert New Executable to Portable Executable?
Posted on 2005-04-12, 20:14
Re: Syndicate not saving games
Posted on 2005-04-12, 18:52
mount k k:\ and start playing
Re: u 4got to mention
Posted on 2005-04-12, 18:25
well somebody who clearly doesn't know what he is talking about deserves no place to rant.
Re: Dosbox 64 bit mode some day?
Posted on 2005-04-12, 13:47
well some stuff inside dosbox will benifit from it. Probably the graphics conversions and such. and maybe it will be more effiecient. Anyway do you use the 32 bits version of dosbox ? or do you use a selfcompiled 64 bits version ?
Re: Text logfile need!
Posted on 2005-04-12, 09:30
well if you are using 0.63 then the application outputs in a different way then normally. else use 0.63 as it didn't work before.
Re: DosBox crashes completely running DJGPP on OS X
Posted on 2005-04-12, 08:16
well if have the feeling we might have an endian problem in the protected mode code somewhere. I think I need to contact some experienced mac programmers in order to compare the output of test sequences.
Re: Wifw 3.11 and floppy
Posted on 2005-04-12, 07:49
yeah I agree to that as well. i sometimes experience differences in the disk images when only mounted compared to booted from.
Re: Wifw 3.11 and floppy
Posted on 2005-04-11, 20:38
well if you want to use a diskimage for wfw3.11 you have to disable both xms and ems in dosbox.conf. then windows 3.11 should work from an diskimage. The floppy stuff is indeed odd. Can;t you just mount it as C or so ?
Re: Dosbox 64 bit mode some day?
Posted on 2005-04-11, 18:23
well dosbox runs allready on 64 bit platforms. Windows isn;t the only os out there 😀 but dosbox has allready been tested on win64 bit as well and it seems to work. Not that much speed to gain though. as we emulate a 386 which was a lot of less bits. so we acces the bits in the same way.
Page 335 of 436