VOGONS

Search

Common searches

Search results

Display options

Display options

Re: Do we have any way of getting SETVER functionality?

Posted on 2006-07-19, 02:09

in DOSBox General
Neat, a setver replacement. I'll give it a shot later tonight. BTW, did I read correctly? Is DOSBox essentially based upon DOS 5.0? I ask because if it's enough based on that, it probably would be a good idea to keep digging for my old copy of it. EDIT: That's commercial software. I'm not paying for …

Do we have any way of getting SETVER functionality?

Posted on 2006-07-19, 01:28

in DOSBox General
I'm guessing DOSBox must have some kind of built-in version list or something because a lot of things work without complaint. Every now and then you try to use something intended for a different version of DOS though (honestly usually the culprit is 6.22) and it refuses to work on principle that it …

Re: Virtual printer

Posted on 2006-07-17, 23:43

in DOSBox Patches
What's the pinout on the keyboard? Is it this keyboard? http://www.clickykeyboards.com/index.cfm/fa/items.main/parentcat/9523/subcatid/0/id/131246 No, I think it isn't. First that seems to be German, and second, the buttons on the left don't seem to be function keys. It's also newer than hers. It …

Re: Virtual printer

Posted on 2006-07-17, 13:59

in DOSBox Patches
Well, I'm trying to get my aunt able to get WordPerfect 5.1 to run and print correctly. The alternative methods ended up being way too complicated for her (actually they ended up being rather a bit too complicated for me and I never got things 100% working with the alternative methods.) What she …

Re: How do I get MT-32 emulation? Is MUNT the only way?

Posted on 2006-07-07, 18:32

in DOSBox General
Ok, looks like config= is only used if it's default or win32 I think. If you set the type to mt32, then it uses built-in MT-32 emulation I think (seems to run less smoothly than MUNT?) Config= set to the MUNT device won't really help there. It's too bad there's no way to use one or the other just by …

Re: How do I get MT-32 emulation? Is MUNT the only way?

Posted on 2006-07-07, 14:49

in DOSBox General
Well, yours used to have it, does it still? I'm using your CVS compiles (and pretty much have been since I first found out that they had pixel shaders and D3D.) Anyway, I looked through on the config= statement. It looks like in Windows all it can do is select which device ID and nothing else (no …

How do I get MT-32 emulation? Is MUNT the only way?

Posted on 2006-07-07, 13:56

in DOSBox General
As nearly as I can determine from the help texts, with version 0.63 the need for a seperate version specifically designed with MT-32 emulation has been negated. In other words, MT-32 emulation is supposed to be built in, correct? I actually have MUNT installed and correctly working, but, the fact is …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2006-04-13, 02:46

in MT-32 General
CD-ROM? Who says they even have to do that? A simple pay for download would cost them next to nothing raising profit ratios even higher on something they currently make $0 a year on. Nonetheless. The answer to your question is "because they don't give a rat's rear end and can't be bothered to make …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2005-09-07, 20:49

in MT-32 General
Uhm, are we on the same subject? Last I checked, the MT-32 emulation team and related fans aren't really companies. I don't know, maybe I'm mistaken there. As to how roland could make money, I've said it twice that I think of off the top of my head, possibly more. It's called "selling." That's how …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2005-09-07, 20:22

in MT-32 General
Huh? Firstly, provide a monetary reason? Is someone providing a monetary reason for the MT-32 emulation project people to do it? It kind of defeats the point of such projects to try to make a required component commercial. Secondly, if no one actually legally owns the ROM, then no one can actually …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2005-09-07, 19:50

in MT-32 General
Either way I think it's necessary for SOMEONE, not necessarily them to provide SOMETHING for people. Even if it weren't as hard as it seems to be to find the original rom, it's still hard enough that it warrants someone out there somewhere providing SOMETHING without an uphill battle just so people …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2005-09-07, 14:07

in MT-32 General
Using something other than Roland ROMs would make it sound "less decent" and hinder efforts to develop a truly accurate emulator. Well, I consider NO rom to be something other than Roland roms too. Percentage-wise, a fake rom is closer to the original roland roms than no rom whatsoever. And there's …

Re: I'm looking for CM-32L ROM

Posted on 2005-09-07, 04:58

in MT-32 General
Well, I for one wouldn't complain to have the original however I got it, but, at this point, I just want SOMETHING. I'm sick of MT-32 emulation being useless for those of us not blessed with a real MT-32 and 1337 electronics skills -- especially in light of the fact that if you have a real MT-32 you …

Page 3 of 5

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Close window
Close window