VOGONS


Bought these (retro) hardware today

Topic actions

Reply 13300 of 39962, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Brickpad wrote:

Those Quantum Bigfoots are notoriously SLOW ala 3600RPM. I have two of the 2.5GB variants, but both have bad sectors. Did I mention they are slow? I've watched ice melt faster in a freezer. 🤣

I kinda regret only having 2 of those, both being like 1.2GB and maybe 2GB or so (there were like 20GB ones or so I think before Quantum (or Maxtor) stopped manufacturing these?) and iirc one of these seemed broken when I tested it 😢

But I'll keep em anyway 😁

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 13301 of 39962, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The Bigfoots (Bigfeet?) were the late 90s version of something like a WD Blue--cheap, slow but lots of storage space. I've got two of them myself (somewhere between 8-20GB), both are in perfect health. 😀 I've fired them up once or twice and run SpinRite on them occasionally to keep their health up, but otherwise they are sitting on a shelf.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 13302 of 39962, by Carlos S. M.

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Cyrix200+ wrote:
The mystery has been solved! Unfortunately, no Pentium Pro machine hidden in the 19"case. But I was happy nontheless! […]
Show full quote

The mystery has been solved! Unfortunately, no Pentium Pro machine hidden in the 19"case. But I was happy nontheless!

There she is, on the test bench:
zbwnYG6l.jpg

Dang! Not a PPro 🙁 But is is Socket 7, my favourite platform!
CjjO6TNl.jpg

Let's see what else is in there!

SoundBlaster 16 CT4180. Meh, but it could be worse!
h2gZ3Xzl.jpg

Trident VGA. Yuck!
X40vbMdl.jpg

Now this is nice! A Quantum Bigfoot!
V4rYGMxl.jpg

Let's check out the CPU. Probably a boring Pentium 1 right? Or not?

My precious!
Za5iADRl.jpg?1

Let's push my luck and just switch it on, I mean what could go wrong right? (I know this is a bit of a gamble)
Wv1ZO2Rl.jpg

Tadaaaaa!
n5gmqKHl.jpg

The motherboard is an Intel TX one, can't find any markings now. EDIT: Some Googling tells me it's a Shuttle HOT-569

I don't have time to disassemble it yet, but the original reason I started this retro hobby is to rebuild my first own real computer, A Cyrix 6x86L PR200+ on an Abit T/P?X5 with a Quantum Bigfoot. So this systems is quite close!

And that for just 20 euro.

I have no idea what to do with the case though, I have to many already...

🤣. The CPU on that PC makes honour to your name xD

What is your biggest Pentium 4 Collection?
Socket 423/478 Motherboards with Universal AGP Slot
Socket 478 Motherboards with PCI-E Slots
LGA 775 Motherboards with AGP Slots
Experiences and thoughts with Socket 423 systems

Reply 13303 of 39962, by Lukeno94

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Brickpad wrote:

Those Quantum Bigfoots are notoriously SLOW ala 3600RPM. I have two of the 2.5GB variants, but both have bad sectors. Did I mention they are slow? I've watched ice melt faster in a freezer. 🤣

Still quicker than the CF card that's in my 486 laptop... I think its transfer speeds are about on par with those in the original IBM PC hard cards...

Reply 13306 of 39962, by Lukeno94

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
clueless1 wrote:

The Bigfoots (Bigfeet?) were the late 90s version of something like a WD Blue--cheap, slow but lots of storage space. I've got two of them myself (somewhere between 8-20GB), both are in perfect health. 😀 I've fired them up once or twice and run SpinRite on them occasionally to keep their health up, but otherwise they are sitting on a shelf.

WD Blues aren't that slow, sure you're not thinking of the WD Greens?

Reply 13307 of 39962, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Lukeno94 wrote:
clueless1 wrote:

The Bigfoots (Bigfeet?) were the late 90s version of something like a WD Blue--cheap, slow but lots of storage space. I've got two of them myself (somewhere between 8-20GB), both are in perfect health. 😀 I've fired them up once or twice and run SpinRite on them occasionally to keep their health up, but otherwise they are sitting on a shelf.

WD Blues aren't that slow, sure you're not thinking of the WD Greens?

Blues are less expensive than Greens. But you could throw the Green in the mix too.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 13308 of 39962, by stamasd

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
MrEWhite wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/ya1cLN5.png SIX! SIX SIX! THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST! HELL, AND FIRE, WAS SPAWNED TO BE RELEASED! :lol: […]
Show full quote

ya1cLN5.png
SIX! SIX SIX! THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST! HELL, AND FIRE, WAS SPAWNED TO BE RELEASED! 🤣

In honor of this milestone I will power on my build with a Radeon X850 in it. The Radeon has some sort of beast painted on the heatsink. I will make it fiery hot. 😀

I/O, I/O,
It's off to disk I go,
With a bit and a byte
And a read and a write,
I/O, I/O

Reply 13309 of 39962, by Robin4

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
fantasma wrote:
CkRtech wrote:

Congrats!

It looks like that card has been at the bottom of a pile for awhile. While it is perfectly normal to have those components leaning over or flattened, it seems like the ones on your card are doing so due to other items stacked on top of them. That cap you mentioned basically had its back broken by being smashed into another component. Also note that your IRQ selection pins are bent. One area that concerns me just a little bit is IC7 - it looks like you might have a bit of pin corrosion - probably just enough that it needs to be cleaned up slightly (in other words - no leg damage).

But really that board first needs to be cleaned! Hopefully you have someone local that can help you out with component testing/replacement. I am jealous! 😀

Thanks for the insight! I don't even want to think what this poor card went through. It certainly was at the bottom of the box when I received it.

I will clean it this weekend with compressed air and q-tips, and inspect if there's some further damage. Then I'll look into replacing that cap, I hope it's still salvageable!

Better replace all those caps, perhaps the other ones are in bad condition as well.. (they dont have to be broken to became bad) On this old hardware you want to be sure that every cap is in perfect condition.

~ At least it can do black and white~

Reply 13310 of 39962, by luckybob

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
MrEWhite wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/ya1cLN5.png SIX! SIX SIX! THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST! HELL, AND FIRE, WAS SPAWNED TO BE RELEASED! :lol: […]
Show full quote

ya1cLN5.png
SIX! SIX SIX! THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST! HELL, AND FIRE, WAS SPAWNED TO BE RELEASED! 🤣

You rang?

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

Reply 13311 of 39962, by shamino

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
clueless1 wrote:
Lukeno94 wrote:
clueless1 wrote:

The Bigfoots (Bigfeet?) were the late 90s version of something like a WD Blue--cheap, slow but lots of storage space. I've got two of them myself (somewhere between 8-20GB), both are in perfect health. 😀 I've fired them up once or twice and run SpinRite on them occasionally to keep their health up, but otherwise they are sitting on a shelf.

WD Blues aren't that slow, sure you're not thinking of the WD Greens?

Blues are less expensive than Greens. But you could throw the Green in the mix too.

Up until recently Blues were mainstream desktop drives running at 7200rpm. The Greens were the 5400rpm drives with automatic head parking that were really just good for bulk storage. People liked the Blues so WD stopped developing them after 1TB (the WD10EZEX) while the Greens kept getting bigger. When too many people persisted in not liking the Greens, WD solved that problem by renaming the Greens as Blues. Once the Blue branding is sufficiently tarnished maybe they'll rename them again.
In other words, WD has exited the market for mainstream 7200rpm drives but because people liked them, they co-opted the label for what they still sell.

Reply 13312 of 39962, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
shamino wrote:

Up until recently Blues were mainstream desktop drives running at 7200rpm. The Greens were the 5400rpm drives with automatic head parking that were really just good for bulk storage. People liked the Blues so WD stopped developing them after 1TB (the WD10EZEX) while the Greens kept getting bigger. When too many people persisted in not liking the Greens, WD solved that problem by renaming the Greens as Blues. Once the Blue branding is sufficiently tarnished maybe they'll rename them again.
In other words, WD has exited the market for mainstream 7200rpm drives but because people liked them, they co-opted the label for what they still sell.

A great way to ruin a good product! 😁

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 13313 of 39962, by TheMobRules

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
shamino wrote:

Up until recently Blues were mainstream desktop drives running at 7200rpm. The Greens were the 5400rpm drives with automatic head parking that were really just good for bulk storage. People liked the Blues so WD stopped developing them after 1TB (the WD10EZEX) while the Greens kept getting bigger. When too many people persisted in not liking the Greens, WD solved that problem by renaming the Greens as Blues. Once the Blue branding is sufficiently tarnished maybe they'll rename them again.
In other words, WD has exited the market for mainstream 7200rpm drives but because people liked them, they co-opted the label for what they still sell.

Sounds just like the kind of decision that a corporate shmuck would take! He will probably even get a bonus to his paycheck for "streamlining" the WD drive line-up 😁

Reply 13314 of 39962, by rein_ein

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Well seems today was a good day,in flea market i got:

Cirrus logic cl-542x on GD 5429 chip

Ai8757Dl.jpg

TEKRAM DC-680C Cache Controller with ram

GTdb27Pl.jpg

ESS MF-1868

fospjNcl.jpg

with... wavetable daughterboard MediaForte SoundForte SF32-WTS-01

wYfOkEzl.jpg
jHMFi1vl.jpg

finally got one of those

3x5uzq-5.png
4sv43l-5.png

Reply 13315 of 39962, by Cyrix200+

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Nice catch! I love the VLB stuff!

rein_ein wrote:
Well seems today was a good day,in flea market i got: […]
Show full quote

Well seems today was a good day,in flea market i got:

Cirrus logic cl-542x on GD 5429 chip

TEKRAM DC-680C Cache Controller with ram

ESS MF-1868

with... wavetable daughterboard MediaForte SoundForte SF32-WTS-01

finally got one of those

1982 to 2001

Reply 13316 of 39962, by Cyrix200+

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Two more pacakages arrived today, again from local sellers:

Socket 7 board, Intel FX chipset, it's a 'BCM SQ595'. Good tech support, the site is still up! http://www.bcmcom.com/tech/sq595/tech595.htm . The CPU is a 75MHz Pentium
c4VO3Sql.jpg?1

486 VLB board, Gemlight? GMB-486UNP V2.2, with Intel 486 DX2 66MHz
pY4JvT6l.jpg

486 PCI board, UMC chipset, removed barrel battery but quite some acid damage near the keyboard connector unfortunately. No markings on the board, but good silkscreened settings on it fortunately.
0EfUJgEl.jpg

386 motherboard, AMD 386 DX-40, again removed barrel but again acid damage 🙁 I also think some cache chips are missing? No markings to tell brand or type...
tHPeKzZl.jpg?1

Various memory and 2 CPU's, Intel 486 SX 33 and Pentium 100
FEVbwC8l.jpg?1

1982 to 2001

Reply 13317 of 39962, by brassicGamer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Great to see so much 486 gear still being found.

My second AGP-era PCI card in the last week: found this for £1 at a boot sale:

20160813_130117-1600x900.jpg
Filename
20160813_130117-1600x900.jpg
File size
441.69 KiB
Views
2974 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

PowerVR Kyro based card. Hard to find apparently. Thanks to amoretro.de for the info.

Check out my blog and YouTube channel for thoughts, articles, system profiles, and tips.

Reply 13318 of 39962, by Lukeno94

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
shamino wrote:

Up until recently Blues were mainstream desktop drives running at 7200rpm. The Greens were the 5400rpm drives with automatic head parking that were really just good for bulk storage. People liked the Blues so WD stopped developing them after 1TB (the WD10EZEX) while the Greens kept getting bigger. When too many people persisted in not liking the Greens, WD solved that problem by renaming the Greens as Blues. Once the Blue branding is sufficiently tarnished maybe they'll rename them again.
In other words, WD has exited the market for mainstream 7200rpm drives but because people liked them, they co-opted the label for what they still sell.

That explains why I was a bit confused - until a couple of months ago I still had a Caviar Blue 640GB drive in my desktop, which was definitely 7200RPM and definitely wasn't hopeless. I hadn't heard that they'd done that (my last two drives have been Seagate).

Reply 13319 of 39962, by Cyrix200+

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I must admit I will jump on any 486 stuff I can find locally, especially VLB.

That Hercules card is cool, looks so modern yet PCI 😀

brassicGamer wrote:

Great to see so much 486 gear still being found.

My second AGP-era PCI card in the last week: found this for £1 at a boot sale:

PowerVR Kyro based card. Hard to find apparently. Thanks to amoretro.de for the info.

1982 to 2001