VOGONS


Great PC! But can it run Crysis?

Topic actions

Reply 200 of 241, by brassicGamer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Well, I'm finally getting around to participating in the various benchmarking threads. I'm a little underwhelmed by the performance of my 955BE. OCing the GPUs made hardly any difference, but bumping the CPU seems to have had more of an effect. Both runs shown.

Stock:

Crysis Bench (Stock).png
Filename
Crysis Bench (Stock).png
File size
777.01 KiB
Views
2107 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

OC:

Crysis Bench (OC).png
Filename
Crysis Bench (OC).png
File size
754.75 KiB
Views
2107 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Check out my blog and YouTube channel for thoughts, articles, system profiles, and tips.

Reply 201 of 241, by cyclone3d

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Saving this spot for later.

I am testing on both the SP Demo and the GOG updated full version.

The SP Demo is getting less that 60fps, while the full updated version is getting 80fps on my main rig at 1920x1080 4xAA Very High 64-bit DX10

64-bit also seems a decent amount faster than 32-bit.

So yeah, the SP Demo is complete crap optimization wise.

Yamaha modified setupds and drivers
Yamaha XG repository
YMF7x4 Guide
Aopen AW744L II SB-LINK

Reply 202 of 241, by tayyare

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I upgraded enough parts in all my modernish PC's during the last year, so I guess a new series of benchmarks are in order.

1. Main Rig: Xeon E5450, 4GB RAM, GTX770 2GB, Windows 7 32bit (was 32.83fps @1920x1050 very high detail and 56.37fps high detail with C2Q Q9550, 4GB RAM, GTX560Ti 1GB, Windows 7 32bit):

Clip_18.jpg
Filename
Clip_18.jpg
File size
640.92 KiB
Views
2041 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

2. Daughter's PC: Phenom II X6 1090T, 8GB RAM, GTX750 2GB, Windows 10 64bit (was 6.73fps @1920x1050 very high detail and 13.18fps high detail with Phenom II X6 1090T, 8GB RAM, GT710 2GB, Windows 10 64bit):

Clip_2 (3).jpg
Filename
Clip_2 (3).jpg
File size
577.74 KiB
Views
2041 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

3. My XP Rig: Opteron 180, 4GB RAM, GTX560Ti 1GB, Windows XP SP3 32bit (was 31.34fps @1680x1050 high detail and 35.88fps @1280x1024 high detail with Opteron 180, 4GB RAM, GTS250 1GB, Windows XP SP3 32bit):

Clip_2 (2).jpg
Filename
Clip_2 (2).jpg
File size
327.29 KiB
Views
2041 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

4. HTPC: C2Q Q9550, 4GB RAM, GT1030 2GB, Windows 7 32bit (no previous test results, was a C2D E8400 with HD 5450, so did not bother at that time to test it):

Clip (3).jpg
Filename
Clip (3).jpg
File size
596.35 KiB
Views
2041 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 203 of 241, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
tayyare wrote:
I upgraded enough parts in all my modernish PC's during the last year, so I guess a new series of benchmarks are in order. […]
Show full quote

I upgraded enough parts in all my modernish PC's during the last year, so I guess a new series of benchmarks are in order.

1. Main Rig: Xeon E5450, 4GB RAM, GTX770 2GB, Windows 7 32bit (was 32.83fps @1920x1050 very high detail and 56.37fps high detail with C2Q Q9550, 4GB RAM, GTX560Ti 1GB, Windows 7 32bit):

Clip_18.jpg

2. Daughter's PC: Phenom II X6 1090T, 8GB RAM, GTX750 2GB, Windows 10 64bit (was 6.73fps @1920x1050 very high detail and 13.18fps high detail with Phenom II X6 1090T, 8GB RAM, GT710 2GB, Windows 10 64bit):

Clip_2 (3).jpg

3. My XP Rig: Opteron 180, 4GB RAM, GTX560Ti 1GB, Windows XP SP3 32bit (was 31.34fps @1680x1050 high detail and 35.88fps @1280x1024 high detail with Opteron 180, 4GB RAM, GTS250 1GB, Windows XP SP3 32bit):

Clip_2 (2).jpg

4. HTPC: C2Q Q9550, 4GB RAM, GT1030 2GB, Windows 7 32bit (no previous test results, was a C2D E8400 with HD 5450, so did not bother at that time to test it):

Clip (3).jpg

something looks off with your average FPS, it shoudn't be in the 1000's, unless your at 800x600 all low, and then maybe a GTX 1080 could break 1k in Crysis

Reply 204 of 241, by tayyare

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Put a period after the first two digits. It's related to our locale settings (number format) in Windows I guess. We use, for example, 1.000,00, not 1,000.00, in where I live. 🤣

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 205 of 241, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
tayyare wrote:

Put a period after the first two digits. It's related to our locale settings (number format) in Windows I guess. We use, for example, 1.000,00, not 1,000.00, in where I live. 🤣

Ok that makes more sense 🤣

Reply 206 of 241, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

My Main rig Ryzen 1600, 16GB DDR4 3200, RX580 8gb 32bit kept crashing, so I did 64bit

crysisryzen.jpg
Filename
crysisryzen.jpg
File size
898.76 KiB
Views
1919 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

The i5 Retro Rig, i5 3470, 4gb DDR3 1333, GTX 275

crysisi5.JPG
Filename
crysisi5.JPG
File size
311.29 KiB
Views
1916 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Primary XP Gamer x2 4200, 2gb ddr 500, 7900gtx sli

crysisx2.JPG
Filename
crysisx2.JPG
File size
380.66 KiB
Views
1916 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 207 of 241, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Pentium 4 3,06GHz @ 3,4GHz (PGA 478), P4i945GC, 2x2GB DDR2 594MHz RAM (CPU-z is wrong DRAM Frequency is 2x FSB speed, not 3:2), "Devil" R9 390X. Windows 7 x86 SP1 (all updates).
Using VSR with Custom Resolutions I did 2560x2048 test with 16xQ MSAA on top.

Crysis mini.png
Filename
Crysis mini.png
File size
524.15 KiB
Views
1896 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Avg. : 11,65 FPS
Min. : 2,3FPS
Max. : 19,34FPS

157143230295.png

Reply 208 of 241, by bakemono

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

How about Windows 2000? My "low power" desktop with Athlon X2 4850e and Radeon 4550, then my main desktop with Athlon II 260 and Radeon 5670

Attachments

  • crysis2.png
    Filename
    crysis2.png
    File size
    642.13 KiB
    Views
    1859 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • crysis1.png
    Filename
    crysis1.png
    File size
    422.63 KiB
    Views
    1859 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 210 of 241, by CarlHopkinsUK

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Damm I can only just fit everything on the screen at 1280x1024 (yes I only have a 19" monitor).

Bench_GB41mQ8400.JPG
Filename
Bench_GB41mQ8400.JPG
File size
242.95 KiB
Views
1807 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Result from my "main" rig, did better than expected for a C2Q with a frankly rubbish GT710.

However seriously debating changing the GPU out for something older and "downgrading" to WinXP 64 on this, even though there is XP drivers for the GT710 I got issues with XP when I tried a dual boot setup before.

e0zer5-2.png

Reply 211 of 241, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
CarlHopkinsUK wrote:
Damm I can only just fit everything on the screen at 1280x1024 (yes I only have a 19" monitor). […]
Show full quote

Damm I can only just fit everything on the screen at 1280x1024 (yes I only have a 19" monitor).

Bench_GB41mQ8400.JPG

Result from my "main" rig, did better than expected for a C2Q with a frankly rubbish GT710.

However seriously debating changing the GPU out for something older and "downgrading" to WinXP 64 on this, even though there is XP drivers for the GT710 I got issues with XP when I tried a dual boot setup before.

I would, I just paid 10 dollars for an 8800GTS 512 which would blow a G710 away.

Reply 213 of 241, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Here is my main "summer system".

Spec.

i7 3770 (Vanilla "non K" CPU configured to use the maximum 4 extra "turbo bins" allowed for "non K" Ivy Bridge CPUs).
Gigabyte G1 Sniper 2 Z68 motherboard with no working voltage adjustment for Ivy Bridge CPUs, otherwise I would have upgraded to an i7 3770K.
2*4GB DDR3 2133 CL 9-10-10-26 1T.
Asus DCII Geforce GTX 780 ti.

Windows 7 Ultimate with some bloat + MSI Afterburner with OSD and all monitoring modules running.
All power saving options such as all C-states and the like are active.
Windows power scheme is set to "Balanced".
Nvidia driver 391.35.

Result.

1920*1080 - No AA - VeryHigh - DX10 - 32bit.

Avarage 89.385 FPS.
Max 115.17 FPS.
Min 59.96 FPS.

The (non K) i7 3770 is not as fast as the latest generations of i7 CPUs but it holds up pretty well considering it's more than 6 years old.
A faster video card than the 5 year old GTX 780 ti would perhaps add a few FPS but I think this benchmark is mostly CPU limited at 1080p with this system.

I did cut the screenshot a bit as I run a 4k desktop.

Crysis Demo 1920x1080 VeryHigh DX10 32bit.jpg
Filename
Crysis Demo 1920x1080 VeryHigh DX10 32bit.jpg
File size
462.59 KiB
Views
1763 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 214 of 241, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sure it can with GTX 1080 (not very fast tho) 😁
Low 800x600 DX9

Crysis Low 800x600 mini.png
Filename
Crysis Low 800x600 mini.png
File size
412.81 KiB
Views
1731 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Very High 1920x1080 DX10

Crysis Very High FHD mini.png
Filename
Crysis Very High FHD mini.png
File size
478.19 KiB
Views
1731 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

157143230295.png

Reply 215 of 241, by Standard Def Steve

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

That's sad, man. A PIII with a 6800GT runs circles around that machine, at least at 800x600.

FOwZOR5.png
Filename
FOwZOR5.png
File size
787.14 KiB
Views
1719 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

P6 chip. Triple the speed of the Pentium.
Tualatin: PIII-S @ 1628MHz | QDI Advance 12T | 2GB DDR-310 | 6800GT | X-Fi | 500GB HDD | 3DMark01: 14,059
Dothan: PM @ 2.9GHz | MSI Speedster FA4 | 2GB DDR2-580 | GTX 750Ti | X-Fi | 500GB SSD | 3DMark01: 43,190

Reply 217 of 241, by CarlHopkinsUK

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
candle_86 wrote:
CarlHopkinsUK wrote:
Damm I can only just fit everything on the screen at 1280x1024 (yes I only have a 19" monitor). […]
Show full quote

Damm I can only just fit everything on the screen at 1280x1024 (yes I only have a 19" monitor).

Bench_GB41mQ8400.JPG

Result from my "main" rig, did better than expected for a C2Q with a frankly rubbish GT710.

However seriously debating changing the GPU out for something older and "downgrading" to WinXP 64 on this, even though there is XP drivers for the GT710 I got issues with XP when I tried a dual boot setup before.

I would, I just paid 10 dollars for an 8800GTS 512 which would blow a G710 away.

Agreed! I have just sourced a GTX650 for £30, and sold the GT710 on for the same - so hopefully the change will be worth it! Il re-bench when it arrives...

Was messing with XP64 today, and as I think someone else mentioned previously im not seeing any benefit over W10.

e0zer5-2.png

Reply 218 of 241, by Palladium

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

This is the oldest platform I can safely test without fear of bad caps:

vMHYVcX.png
LLSuM0V.png
h1Kxoh5.png

This system is still unable to play Youtube 720p60 without GPU acceleration, heh. It's also sad a 2017 CPU is barely 2x better than a 2004 microarchitecture in IPC.

Reply 219 of 241, by CarlHopkinsUK

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

GTX650 arrived and did a quick test on the same settings as before...

GTX650_Crysis_DX9_Base.JPG
Filename
GTX650_Crysis_DX9_Base.JPG
File size
256.46 KiB
Views
1572 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Quite an improvement, well worth the £30! Will be interesting to see what the switch to a X5460 will make...

e0zer5-2.png