Predator99 wrote:Benchmark would be interesting. Do you know a Software...? It needs to draw a diagram KB vs. speed to discriminate between the o […]
Show full quote
mrau wrote:
it's not uninteresting, just no hardware here to play with;
would You be able to test how speed is influenced by isa? access times are of interest too.
i understand that this works without drivers only on 286, right?
Benchmark would be interesting. Do you know a Software...? It needs to draw a diagram KB vs. speed to discriminate between the onboard an the ISA XMS. I dont know such program for a 286.
Yes, 286 is the main target. On a XT you cant use the 16-bit cards. There are 8-bit cards around, but as far as I know they are only for filling the RAM below 1MB.
On a 386 these cards should run. But you dont need them as there is usually enough RAM onboard and you can switch between XMS and EMS with the EMM386 driver.
An exception on the matter is the Intel above board with that `bridge` chip installed. But regular 16-bit cards are only designed to work on AT class systems.
So normally they would use XT or X for 8bit cards. And AT for AT board. The fact of the matter that is that AT boards would only works stable / without any problems on slower class 286 systems. Iam guessing that the boundary is till 286 12mhz..
16, 20, 25mhz should to be fast to use these expension cards with.
There are 8-bit cards around, but as far as I know they are only for filling the RAM below 1MB.
That last isnt true, most of these cards where used to add only EMS memory to the system. And in that period of time they where also used for a printer spooler (so to give the printer an bigger memory backup to store more documents at once for printing out.
There was also an option to create a RAM drive for fast accessing files / data.. And there was also an conventional memory backfill option, when you bought in that time a machine with an motherboard that only could address a max of 256KB of memory.. On these systems you had to backfill it to get the max of 640KB of memory.
And yes there where also backfill only cards.. These had a lot smaller pcb and mostly could resident 384Kb- or 512KB of memory.. Sometimes these boards where coupled with an multi io section, like the ast rampage card.
Predator99 wrote:Same method, next card :-)
"2M-EMS GA-229" […]
Show full quote
Same method, next card 😀
"2M-EMS GA-229"
IMG_0155.JPG
Left block ("SW2") 1-7 correspond to DFI AT-RAMBANK SW2 S1-S7 for starting adress selection.
SW2-8: off
Right block ("SW1"): set all to on
...and you get 2MB XMS 😀
And the end I will combine all my cards to get 8MB in total in a 286 😉
EDIT: This card seems to be 100% compatible to the AT-Rambank. EMS configuration and driver is also working. Manual (http://minuszerodegrees.net/manuals.htm) + Driver (https://www.driverguide.com/driver/detail.php … driverid=210997) attached as backup...
DFI AT RAMBANK - ATRAM401 (1).ZIP
AT-RAMBANK Users Manual.pdf
Iam guessing that the brand could be Gigabyte.. Because almost a decade they using GA- xxxx on their products.. So i think this wouldnt be an exception
~ At least it can do black and white~