VOGONS


Reply 120 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
feipoa wrote:

Did a clean install of Win95c on my SXL2-66 system. Run cpuz.exe and ended up with a blue screen:

CPUZ_crash_SXL2-66.jpg

Thanks feipoa, this is very interesting.

Could you please try that version, and if it runs post a TXT report ?
http://download.cpuid.com/betas/cpuz_w95.zip

Thanks !

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 121 of 440, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

VJiCc6t.png
Valid : https://valid.x86.fr/z1bu5e
Works 😁
Awesome job 😎
PS. 3,2GHz on NB Frequency and 1600MHz (effective) on DRAM Frequency.
Probably can't detect it because BCLK clock isn't showing (in my case BCLK = 160MHz), "SPD" tab is also empty.
Other readings are spot on (ah, total memory capacity is 12GB, but it's Win98 so... 😉).

157143230295.png

Reply 122 of 440, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
CuPid wrote:
Thanks feipoa, this is very interesting. […]
Show full quote
feipoa wrote:

Did a clean install of Win95c on my SXL2-66 system. Run cpuz.exe and ended up with a blue screen:

CPUZ_crash_SXL2-66.jpg

Thanks feipoa, this is very interesting.

Could you please try that version, and if it runs post a TXT report ?
http://download.cpuid.com/betas/cpuz_w95.zip

Thanks !

I tried with the zip you just linked, but I receive the same error. Also, the system musts be hard reset once this blue screen appears. System frozen. Are there some dependencies I'm missing? Were other users able to run CPU-Z w/Win95 and the SXL?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 123 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
feipoa wrote:

I tried with the zip you just linked, but I receive the same error. Also, the system musts be hard reset once this blue screen appears. System frozen. Are there some dependencies I'm missing? Were other users able to run CPU-Z w/Win95 and the SXL?

No dependency is missing. The program generated an exception in the vxd driver.

kixs did on his SXL2-66 (Need help to improve the support of 486/586/686 class CPUs in CPU-Z) but in the meantime there were a lot of changes to improve the detection.
I'll try to figure out what can cause that, sorry for the BSODs 😒

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 124 of 440, by Vynix

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Here is my mere contribution:

Mobo: Shuttle HOT-555A (CPU-Z reports the correct chipset, in my case an Intel PCISet i430VX

CPU: Intel Pentium 133 MHZ (non-MMX)

RAM: EDO 72-pin SIMM modules

Attachments

  • CPUZVX.jpg
    Filename
    CPUZVX.jpg
    File size
    85.26 KiB
    Views
    1336 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • CPUZBenchVX.jpg
    Filename
    CPUZBenchVX.jpg
    File size
    67.04 KiB
    Views
    1336 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • Filename
    A7H7U9_CPUZ.txt
    File size
    14.05 KiB
    Downloads
    52 downloads
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Proud owner of a Shuttle HOT-555A 430VX motherboard and two wonderful retro laptops, namely a Compaq Armada 1700 [nonfunctional] and a HP Omnibook XE3-GC [fully working :p]

Reply 125 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Vynix wrote:
Here is my mere contribution: […]
Show full quote

Here is my mere contribution:

Mobo: Shuttle HOT-555A (CPU-Z reports the correct chipset, in my case an Intel PCISet i430VX

CPU: Intel Pentium 133 MHZ (non-MMX)

RAM: EDO 72-pin SIMM modules

Thanks. Does your system have L2 cache ? if yes, what's its size ?

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 126 of 440, by Vynix

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
CuPid wrote:
Vynix wrote:
Here is my mere contribution: […]
Show full quote

Here is my mere contribution:

Mobo: Shuttle HOT-555A (CPU-Z reports the correct chipset, in my case an Intel PCISet i430VX

CPU: Intel Pentium 133 MHZ (non-MMX)

RAM: EDO 72-pin SIMM modules

Thanks. Does your system have L2 cache ? if yes, what's its size ?

It has indeed L2 cache AFAIK, if I disable it, my P133 slows at about the speed of a 486 DX, but as for how much it has indeed 512kB on-board. I have no idea unfortunately, I'd check how much I actually have on this system, maybe Cachecheck will be able to shed some light on this.

Edit: there you go, I found a old Speedsys screenshot when I benched my P133, it indeed shows that my motherboard has 512kB on-board.
d310139f5c6e2acf6a2fabda7218cff535dc5754.png

Proud owner of a Shuttle HOT-555A 430VX motherboard and two wonderful retro laptops, namely a Compaq Armada 1700 [nonfunctional] and a HP Omnibook XE3-GC [fully working :p]

Reply 127 of 440, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I really need to pull out my EISA/VLB 486 machine and see how this works on it. It does have a 486 DX4-100 Overdrive in it that supports the CPUID command, but that SiS EISA chipset might be a challenge.

Reply 128 of 440, by BSA Starfire

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Any interest in me trying this on my Compaq Presario 2232 Cyrix Media GX machine? it's running 95 and no other diag software I have tried in the past manages to figure it out, most just plain crash, to this day I am unsure what the clock speed of the CPU is!

286 20MHz,1MB RAM,Trident 8900B 1MB, Conner CFA-170A.SB 1350B
386SX 33MHz,ULSI 387,4MB Ram,OAK OTI077 1MB. Seagate ST1144A, MS WSS audio
Amstrad PC 9486i, DX/2 66, 16 MB RAM, Cirrus SVGA,Win 95,SB 16
Cyrix MII 333,128MB,SiS 6326 H0 rev,ESS 1869,Win ME

Reply 129 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
BSA Starfire wrote:

Any interest in me trying this on my Compaq Presario 2232 Cyrix Media GX machine? it's running 95 and no other diag software I have tried in the past manages to figure it out, most just plain crash, to this day I am unsure what the clock speed of the CPU is!

Yes, definitely, thanks !

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 130 of 440, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I ran CPU-Z on my Cyrix MediaGX system. It contains a GX1-300 and is running at 300 MHz (33.3 x 9). The companion chip is the Cx5530.

Benchmarks with 1.89.7.x32 in,

Win98SE
CPU = 301.6
FPU = 1129.9

NT4
CPU = 307.5
FPU = 1151.6

W2K
CPU = 307.3
FPU = 1144.6

If running W2K, I am able to successfully load the non-Win95 version with revision 1.90.0, but after running the benchmark program, the CPU/FPU score remain at 0.

I noticed that a lot of information is missing, like multiplier, bus speed, L1 cache, DRAM freq, etc., but for another user (Garrett W), his system did display this information. He has a slightly differently system, based on the GXLV and has AWARD BIOS version 6.00GP, whereas mine is 4.51GP. Perhaps his newer BIOS is the reason? Also, he was using 1.89.1 which is older. His system has companion chip Cx5520, whereas mine is Cx5530.

GX1-300.jpg
Filename
GX1-300.jpg
File size
694.73 KiB
Views
1194 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 131 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thanks feipoa.
Cyrix processors released after 1997 use the NS manufacturer name instead of Cyrix, that explains the missing infos.
I've added NS in the list, and treat them as a Cyrix.

http://download.cpuid.com/betas/cpuz_w95.zip

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 133 of 440, by red-ray

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
feipoa wrote:

Did you also update the non-win9x version for testing with w2k?

I doubt it, but cpuz_w9x.exe should work OK in W2K/WXP anyway. I have been testing some other changes on WXP and W10.

Reply 135 of 440, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I am aware that the Win9x versions works in W2K, as I have provided benchmarks for this condition above.

feipoa wrote:

I ran CPU-Z on my Cyrix MediaGX system...with 1.89.7.x32 in...W2K...

I am more or less asking if you do not intend to support MediaGX systems in W2K when using the non-Win9x version of CPU-Z?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 136 of 440, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Ran the updated executable in Win98se - I can see the additional information now, but I think some of it is incorrect.

It lists the GX1 as having a .35 um process, but wiki lists it as .18 um. Also, I am using the PGA-320 variant of the chip, not BGA-352.

GX1-300_2.jpg
Filename
GX1-300_2.jpg
File size
88.18 KiB
Views
1135 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 137 of 440, by CuPid

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
feipoa wrote:

I am more or less asking if you do not intend to support MediaGX systems in W2K when using the non-Win9x version of CPU-Z?

Ah sorry I did not understand. Here is a "classic" fixed version :
http://download.cpuid.com/betas/cpuz_190.zip

I need a vacation.

tbmtg3-99.png
zav4kj-99.png

Reply 138 of 440, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Great! Tested it. Works like the win9x version, but CPU benchmarking still doesn't function. Also, under "Package" it says "Socket 5 (320)" I believe it may be closer to a socket 7 as it uses split voltage (2.0V core, 3.3V I/O). The ZIF on the motherboard says "socket 7", although only GX, GXm, GX1 CPUs will work in the motherboard. I've seen people use the nomenclature, "socket 7 GXm" which is probably more fitting.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 139 of 440, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
i7 965.jpg
Filename
i7 965.jpg
File size
169.76 KiB
Views
1052 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

^i7 965 a.k.a. Bloomfield 😒

MTRRs HWINFO uses :

HWINFO i7 965 (MTRRs).png
Filename
HWINFO i7 965 (MTRRs).png
File size
141.36 KiB
Views
1052 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

157143230295.png