Thanks for the feedback.

Hello my friend!
Some time before i get some uncommon stuff. It's a mother MSI 845 PRO V1 (Socket 423) and two CPU for it.
First CPU has SSpec SL57V, second- SL4SG.
First detected by system correct. Butwith second i get some strange results.
In latest version of HW info (6.40 and 6.38) it detects like Quality Samle CPU - QAQ2.
Ok. That's programs are too new. I download older version.
HWinfo Ver.3,35 thinks that's SL4SG,SL4SC. But in the type of graph - Eng. Sample.
Hmm. Much closer to the truth.?
Downloding Hwinfo ver. 1,56...
Ok. Now all is right. SSpec, type...But wait . CPU frequently 11k MHz.
Can it be CPU with edited IHS?
Downwards i add screenshots and results.

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-05, 19:36:

Hello my friend! Some time before i get some uncommon stuff. It's a mother MSI 845 PRO V1 (Socket 423) and two CPU for it. First […]
Show full quote

Hello my friend!
Some time before i get some uncommon stuff. It's a mother MSI 845 PRO V1 (Socket 423) and two CPU for it.
First CPU has SSpec SL57V, second- SL4SG.
First detected by system correct. Butwith second i get some strange results.
In latest version of HW info (6.40 and 6.38) it detects like Quality Samle CPU - QAQ2.
Ok. That's programs are too new. I download older version.
HWinfo Ver.3,35 thinks that's SL4SG,SL4SC. But in the type of graph - Eng. Sample.
Hmm. Much closer to the truth.?
Downloding Hwinfo ver. 1,56...
Ok. Now all is right. SSpec, type...But wait . CPU frequently 11k MHz.
Can it be CPU with edited IHS?
Downwards i add screenshots and results.

Well, the CPU reports it's an Engineering Sample, hence HWiNFO reported the respective QDF instead of SSPEC.
Please attach the HWiNFO Debug File from the latest version so I can check this in detail.

Also if you're able to get the old Intel CPU Identification Utility you might try if it will report an ES too.

Here it is.

Sorry, that's not the Debug File. See here how to create it: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/read-thi … g-a-report.241/
Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:37:

Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

It can be found at https://www.techspot.com/downloads/2979-intel … on-utility.html

Not sure if the version on the Intel website works on 32-bit processors

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:37:

Sorry, that's not the Debug File. See here how to create it: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/read-thi … g-a-report.241/
Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

Thanks. Hopes now i make right.

debs3759 wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:43:

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:37:

Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

It can be found at https://www.techspot.com/downloads/2979-intel … on-utility.html

Not sure if the version on the Intel website works on 32-bit processors

Thank's for the link. But this do not support 32-bit CPU. =(

According to that data it seems to me it's an ES.
We'll need to find an old version of Processor Identification Utility for confirmation.

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-05, 21:57:

Thanks. Hopes now i make right. […]
Show full quote

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:37:

Sorry, that's not the Debug File. See here how to create it: https://www.hwinfo.com/forum/threads/read-thi … g-a-report.241/
Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

Thanks. Hopes now i make right.

debs3759 wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:43:

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 20:37:

Also try the Intel Processor Identification Utility if you can find it somewhere.

It can be found at https://www.techspot.com/downloads/2979-intel … on-utility.html

Not sure if the version on the Intel website works on 32-bit processors

Thank's for the link. But this do not support 32-bit CPU. =(

The list says it does. Oh well.

Mumak wrote on 2021-01-05, 22:02:

According to that data it seems to me it's an ES.
We'll need to find an old version of Processor Identification Utility for confirmation.

I have lots more fidenus in neither of the attached works

Mine is 100% ES for sure, so CPUZ get's it wrong and also failed to sensibly report the RDRAM SPD + multiplier range. HWiNFO failed to report CPU LFM Min which is x8.

red-ray, thank you for old versions of @Intel CPU U@.
Fidenu25 do not see something special.
Am i right?

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 00:38:

Am i right?

Look at the Frequency Test page. What does SIV32X report on your system?

Seems Intel know something about it.

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 02:26:

Seems Intel know something about it.

Thank you, I guess we need to figure out why. What ratios does the BIOS allow you to set? With my CPU which is an ES I am offered as below, the range is x8 to x23.

By default multiper was x8.
I change it to x14 but in the system i get same results exept multiper = "x14"

Looks like we need to adjust detection of Production status for Willamette. Problem is Intel didn't disclose this fully even under NDA.

By the way i found uncorfimed information that Willamate get HT support but was disabled by Intel...

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 16:02:

By default multiper was x8. I change it to x14 but in the system i get same results exept multiper = "x14"

I think you are saying that it always runs at x14 no matter what you select in the BIOS, is this the case?

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 16:44:

By the way i found uncorfimed information that Willamate get HT support but was disabled by Intel...

I guess there were ES Willamette CPUs with HT enabled, but I have never come across one or a Xeon DP (Foster) with HT, but there are Xeon MP (Foster MP) CPUs with HT and they also have an L3 cache.

red-ray wrote on 2021-01-06, 16:57:

I think you are saying that it always runs at x14 no matter what you select in the BIOS, is this the case? […]
Show full quote

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 16:02:

By default multiper was x8. I change it to x14 but in the system i get same results exept multiper = "x14"

I think you are saying that it always runs at x14 no matter what you select in the BIOS, is this the case?

ApostolCV wrote on 2021-01-06, 16:44:

By the way i found uncorfimed information that Willamate get HT support but was disabled by Intel...

I guess there were ES Willamette CPUs with HT enabled, but I have never come across one or a Xeon DP (Foster) with HT, but there are Xeon MP (Foster MP) CPUs with HT and they also have an L3 cache.

Yes, my friend,no matter which multiper i put.It start at locked -x14

Hope it's useful.