VOGONS


Help! PC won't power on with Slotket

Topic actions

Reply 60 of 78, by rootinit

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

My original goal with this machine was to have a single PC that could competently play games from the early 1990s into the early 2000s. Not sure if anyone else is still following this thread, but at this point, I'm just trying different sorts of CPUs to see if anything reports an actual L2 cache. Otherwise, I've kind of given-up on this whole idea, and will end-up getting a Pentium 4 for the later games.

Anyway, I can also report that a 850MHz/100MHz/256KB/1.75V Coppermine (SL4CC) has the same behavior. No L2 cache is reported. At this point, I am also inclined to believe that this is a problem with the BIOS, but I'm not sure why because there are others who have reported the latest BIOS is working fine with these later CPUs.

IBM ThinkPad 755Cs (Win 3.11) • IBM ThinkPad 365x (Win 98SE) • IBM ThinkPad TransNote (Win 2k)
IBM PC (PC DOS 3.30) • IBM PS/2 Model 80 (Win 3.11) • IBM PC 300GL (Win 98SE)
AT&T PC 6300 (MS-DOS 6.22) • Dell XPS T550 (Win 98SE)

Reply 61 of 78, by Sphere478

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I’m following, I wonder if it’s a wiring problem or a bios problem. Seems like maybe a pin isn’t being pulled or routed right..

Perhaps something similar to the tillamook issues.

Read the tillamook working l2 thread and the socket 370 tweaker thread, see if that gives you any ideas. If you find a pin mod for this not listed already in the tweaker thread, be sure to describe it there so it can be added

Sphere's PCB projects.
-
Sphere’s socket 5/7 cpu collection.
-
SUCCESSFUL K6-2+ to K6-3+ Full Cache Enable Mod
-
Tyan S1564S to S1564D single to dual processor conversion (also s1563 and s1562)

Reply 62 of 78, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I don't think it will be a BIOS problem. More likely a damaged trace on board or a damaged socket.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, 80GB HDD, Yamaha SM718 ISA, 19" AOC 9GlrA
Athlon 64 3400+, MSI K8T Neo V, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT 512MB, 250GB HDD, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 63 of 78, by Sphere478

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AlexZ wrote on 2022-07-04, 22:49:

I don't think it will be a BIOS problem. More likely a damaged trace on board or a damaged socket.

Does a slot processor work?

Sphere's PCB projects.
-
Sphere’s socket 5/7 cpu collection.
-
SUCCESSFUL K6-2+ to K6-3+ Full Cache Enable Mod
-
Tyan S1564S to S1564D single to dual processor conversion (also s1563 and s1562)

Reply 64 of 78, by rootinit

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Sphere478 wrote on 2022-07-05, 02:22:
AlexZ wrote on 2022-07-04, 22:49:

I don't think it will be a BIOS problem. More likely a damaged trace on board or a damaged socket.

Does a slot processor work?

The Katmai slot processors that I've used work just fine. It is the Coppermine ones (both Slot 1 and Socket 370 w/slotket) that fail to show an L2 cache.

IBM ThinkPad 755Cs (Win 3.11) • IBM ThinkPad 365x (Win 98SE) • IBM ThinkPad TransNote (Win 2k)
IBM PC (PC DOS 3.30) • IBM PS/2 Model 80 (Win 3.11) • IBM PC 300GL (Win 98SE)
AT&T PC 6300 (MS-DOS 6.22) • Dell XPS T550 (Win 98SE)

Reply 65 of 78, by Sphere478

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-05, 07:55:
Sphere478 wrote on 2022-07-05, 02:22:
AlexZ wrote on 2022-07-04, 22:49:

I don't think it will be a BIOS problem. More likely a damaged trace on board or a damaged socket.

Does a slot processor work?

The Katmai slot processors that I've used work just fine. It is the Coppermine ones (both Slot 1 and Socket 370 w/slotket) that fail to show an L2 cache.

So, it’s a bios or board problem then.

Sphere's PCB projects.
-
Sphere’s socket 5/7 cpu collection.
-
SUCCESSFUL K6-2+ to K6-3+ Full Cache Enable Mod
-
Tyan S1564S to S1564D single to dual processor conversion (also s1563 and s1562)

Reply 66 of 78, by PARKE

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-05, 07:55:
Sphere478 wrote on 2022-07-05, 02:22:

Does a slot processor work?

The Katmai slot processors that I've used work just fine. It is the Coppermine ones (both Slot 1 and Socket 370 w/slotket) that fail to show an L2 cache.

Have you tried to run one of the Coppermines at fsb 66 ?

Reply 67 of 78, by rootinit

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
PARKE wrote on 2022-07-05, 15:24:
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-05, 07:55:
Sphere478 wrote on 2022-07-05, 02:22:

Does a slot processor work?

The Katmai slot processors that I've used work just fine. It is the Coppermine ones (both Slot 1 and Socket 370 w/slotket) that fail to show an L2 cache.

Have you tried to run one of the Coppermines at fsb 66 ?

Not yet. I assume I just need to modify the jumpers on the Slotket to get it to do that. I'll report back soon.

IBM ThinkPad 755Cs (Win 3.11) • IBM ThinkPad 365x (Win 98SE) • IBM ThinkPad TransNote (Win 2k)
IBM PC (PC DOS 3.30) • IBM PS/2 Model 80 (Win 3.11) • IBM PC 300GL (Win 98SE)
AT&T PC 6300 (MS-DOS 6.22) • Dell XPS T550 (Win 98SE)

Reply 68 of 78, by rootinit

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Just realized that's not actually possible to do with this Slotket. Its jumper settings only allow for the main board to choose the FSB speed or for the CPU to do it. Either way, there are no Coppermines that are actually natively at 66 MHz FSB, so I cannot make it do that. 100 MHz FSB processors work fine here as Katmais though, so it shouldn't be a question of whether this board can do 100 MHz or not.

If anyone ever discovers what I'm doing wrong here, let me know, but as far as I can tell, there's nothing else I can really do short of finding yet another slotket.

IBM ThinkPad 755Cs (Win 3.11) • IBM ThinkPad 365x (Win 98SE) • IBM ThinkPad TransNote (Win 2k)
IBM PC (PC DOS 3.30) • IBM PS/2 Model 80 (Win 3.11) • IBM PC 300GL (Win 98SE)
AT&T PC 6300 (MS-DOS 6.22) • Dell XPS T550 (Win 98SE)

Reply 69 of 78, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Technically, green FCPGA Celerons should be 66FSB for anything inbetween 566MHz and 700MHz if I remember correctly. If you have any of those, it would be worth a test.

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 70 of 78, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

The 66Mhz ones run from 533A to 766. I think the 766 got popular for being both the highest 66mhz bus part, and the highest multi for overclockage, so they might be priced a bit higher. Can probably find middling ones for what loose change you can dig out of the couch still though.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 71 of 78, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Celeron 766 is not very useful for overclocking as the chance of it running at 1150Mhz is very slim. Celeron 600-633 is the best.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, 80GB HDD, Yamaha SM718 ISA, 19" AOC 9GlrA
Athlon 64 3400+, MSI K8T Neo V, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT 512MB, 250GB HDD, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 73 of 78, by Iris030380

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have a bunch of slockets lying around if you want me to send you one to try out. They are all new so shouldn't have any issues, and will help in the process of elimination. Got a million P3's also if you want to try a different flavour CPU.

I5-2500K @ 4.0Ghz + R9 290 + 8GB DDR3 1333 :: I3-540 @ 4.2 GHZ + 6870 4GB DDR3 2000 :: E6300 @ 2.7 GHZ + 1950XTX 2GB DDR2 800 :: A64 3700 + 1950PRO AGP 2GB DDR400 :: K63+ @ 550MHZ + V2 SLI 256 PC133:: P200 + MYSTIQUE / 3Dfx 128 PC66

Reply 74 of 78, by Iris030380

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Both of these badboys look like they have plenty of jumpers / switches for messing with the FSB / multipliers / voltage etc...

https://ibb.co/VJkbBt0

https://ibb.co/HT0DkRG

I have lots of others. Just packed away "neatly", as in - underneath a million other things which are also packed away neatly.

I5-2500K @ 4.0Ghz + R9 290 + 8GB DDR3 1333 :: I3-540 @ 4.2 GHZ + 6870 4GB DDR3 2000 :: E6300 @ 2.7 GHZ + 1950XTX 2GB DDR2 800 :: A64 3700 + 1950PRO AGP 2GB DDR400 :: K63+ @ 550MHZ + V2 SLI 256 PC133:: P200 + MYSTIQUE / 3Dfx 128 PC66

Reply 75 of 78, by Radical Vision

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Maybe try to use another CPU or another slotket.. Also you can try another slot motherboard (preferably normal one, not OEM) just for the sake of testing the components...

The fact that this slotket is NOS, does not make it automatically an working one.. Maybe the caps did dry out and they dont do anything now. There is also the chance of some incompatibility between these exact parts that you are trying to make work together... For a start try that slotket + CPU on non OEM slot board such as ABIT, ASUS, GIGAbyte etc...

Mah systems retro, old, newer (Radical stuff)
W3680 4.5/ GA-x58 UD7/ R9 280x
K7 2.6/ NF7-S/ HD3850
IBM x2 P3 933/ GA-6VXD7/ Voodoo V 5.5K
Cmq P2 450/ GA-BX2000/ V2 SLI
IBM PC365
Cmq DeskPRO 486/33
IBM PS/2 Model 56
SPS IntelleXT 8088

Reply 76 of 78, by PC Hoarder Patrol

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-06, 17:24:

Just realized that's not actually possible to do with this Slotket. Its jumper settings only allow for the main board to choose the FSB speed or for the CPU to do it. Either way, there are no Coppermines that are actually natively at 66 MHz FSB, so I cannot make it do that. 100 MHz FSB processors work fine here as Katmais though, so it shouldn't be a question of whether this board can do 100 MHz or not.

If anyone ever discovers what I'm doing wrong here, let me know, but as far as I can tell, there's nothing else I can really do short of finding yet another slotket.

Still think this is most likely now a BIOS mis-reporting / limitation issue (with any 'workig' sloket) on this board. The earlier mention of similar success on the 300PL / 6862 version with AGP, is down to the fact that this board received explicit BIOS support for coppermines plus numerous coppermine microcode updates - something which was completely lacking on the 300GL / 6275.

Reply 77 of 78, by rootinit

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
PC Hoarder Patrol wrote on 2022-07-09, 11:38:
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-06, 17:24:

Just realized that's not actually possible to do with this Slotket. Its jumper settings only allow for the main board to choose the FSB speed or for the CPU to do it. Either way, there are no Coppermines that are actually natively at 66 MHz FSB, so I cannot make it do that. 100 MHz FSB processors work fine here as Katmais though, so it shouldn't be a question of whether this board can do 100 MHz or not.

If anyone ever discovers what I'm doing wrong here, let me know, but as far as I can tell, there's nothing else I can really do short of finding yet another slotket.

Still think this is most likely now a BIOS mis-reporting / limitation issue (with any 'workig' sloket) on this board. The earlier mention of similar success on the 300PL / 6862 version with AGP, is down to the fact that this board received explicit BIOS support for coppermines plus numerous coppermine microcode updates - something which was completely lacking on the 300GL / 6275.

I'm inclined to agree. While I sincerely appreciate the offer from @Iris030380 to try different slotkets/CPUs, my understanding is (esp. for anyone reading who hasn't followed the whole thread), we could rule out the slotket incompatibility because it has the same bad behavior with a native Slot 1 coppermine CPU. I have no clue about this, but I wonder if there's a way to hack in the coppermine microcode from the 6285 BIOS if that truly exists. I would've thought that they would have nearly the same BIOS already though, because the only difference between these two models was the fact that the PL had an AGP lot, and the 6275 didn't.

IBM ThinkPad 755Cs (Win 3.11) • IBM ThinkPad 365x (Win 98SE) • IBM ThinkPad TransNote (Win 2k)
IBM PC (PC DOS 3.30) • IBM PS/2 Model 80 (Win 3.11) • IBM PC 300GL (Win 98SE)
AT&T PC 6300 (MS-DOS 6.22) • Dell XPS T550 (Win 98SE)

Reply 78 of 78, by Julito

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
rootinit wrote on 2022-07-10, 20:04:

I'm inclined to agree. While I sincerely appreciate the offer from @Iris030380 to try different slotkets/CPUs, my understanding is (esp. for anyone reading who hasn't followed the whole thread), we could rule out the slotket incompatibility because it has the same bad behavior with a native Slot 1 coppermine CPU. I have no clue about this, but I wonder if there's a way to hack in the coppermine microcode from the 6285 BIOS if that truly exists. I would've thought that they would have nearly the same BIOS already though, because the only difference between these two models was the fact that the PL had an AGP lot, and the 6275 didn't.

Hi, finally you tried another slotlek or best CPU?

I have same machine with a lastest bios and a 550 katmai. Thinks on install a slotket or a slot1 800 / 100mhz (i suppose that not support 133).

Can you tell if your project is active or finished?

Regards

IBM 300GL: Pentium III 550 Katmai, 2x256, FX5500 PCI 256Mb @ 305/357, AWE64 Gold, LAN 10/100
IBM Netvista: Pentium IV 3.06, 2x1024, HD3650 AGP