First post, by Jackhead
I really confused about the search results people say " I have Fake cache". I hope someone can help me clear this.
First at all when i search for fake cache any time i got only the info that cachechk say there is no L2 Cache.
And to be honest i testet now 3 different cache sets and that cachechk tool tells me any time different stuff.
SO lets start with my first question.
Fake cache is detected as real chache on bios? Means i can activate L2. Boot screen shows up the correct amount. System boots fine , but cachechk say its "maybe" fake chache than it is?
Or does fake cache dont even show up on boot, and system dont boot when L2 is activated?
I test 256KB 4 chips and 2x 1MB sets. Some bench tools say i have 128kb some say 256kb cachechk say 0..
Than i start testing my read/write speeds with and without L2 active. And i got different results. Of corse faster with L2.
To be honest im not sure what to trust...
Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - AMD A5x86 X5 ADZ 133MHz @160MHz - 64MB RAM - CT1600 - GUS ACE - MPU-401 AT - ET4000W32P
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI @ 66MHz PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS