VOGONS


Computer hardware 20 years ago.

Topic actions

Reply 61 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Tom.. wrote on 2023-05-14, 17:08:

look at my sound test scores in 3dmark 2003, they seem too low to me.

I did a quick Google to see what's normal, pretty much 0 results.

I'm confident that the results will be worse than for nForce2 with Soundstorm but that said I have no idea whats normal for nForce2 either as I only run the game and CPU tests to save time.

I will cobble together a quick test setup with the A7V880. But I'm going away on a short vacation starting Thursday so it will not be next weekend but the one after that.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 62 of 79, by Tom..

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

No need to rush, if you don't forget, check it out at your leisure, Thanks

-----------------------------------------------------------

I also changed the memory settings (command rate (CR 1T), the improvement is rather small.. (The sound card in the tests is Creative Sound Blaster Live)

1.jpg

2.jpg

Reply 63 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I am back from my vacation but I managed to bring home a nasty cold. I'm very rarely sick but when I am I have a hard time finding the motivation do do anything useful even if I'm not even sick enough to stay home from work.

So I have not built a system with the Asus A7V880 to help Tom or posted the results for the Geforce FX5900 Ultra benching I did before going away, both things I had planned to do this weekend.

.

For now here is an image showing the two Asus A7V880 motherboards I managed to find among my other Socket A boards before going away.

2x Asus A7V880.jpg
Filename
2x Asus A7V880.jpg
File size
338.17 KiB
Views
1184 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

With luck my cold gives up and I find the motivation do do some retro computer tinkering during the coming week.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 64 of 79, by Tom..

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Get well soon 😀

I found another computer with a motherboard on Socket A ECS K7S5A (Non-Official BIOS - Honey X) .. The graphics card (Sapphire Radeon 9550 256 MB) has very weak memory, you can't overclock it much 😉

SAM-4004.jpg

0004.png

2000.png

2001.png

2003.png

I also launched Doom 3 1.1 + Doom 3 ATi shader tweak (interaction.vfp) , with the following settings 1024x768 , 800x600 Low Quality , shadows off..
+ autoexec.cfg 😉

r_shadows 0
seta com_videoRam "256"
seta image_filter "GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_NEAREST"
seta g_projectileLights "0"
seta g_doubleVision "0"
seta g_muzzleFlash "0"
seta com_purgeAll "1"
seta image_useCache "1"
seta image_cacheMegs "256"
seta image_cacheMinK "32768"
seta m_smooth "6"

doom3-2023-05-30-09-54-11-92.png

1024x768

1024x768.png

800 x600

800x600.png

Reply 65 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Tom.. wrote on 2023-05-29, 07:52:

Get well soon 😀

I found another computer with a motherboard on Socket A ECS K7S5A (Non-Official BIOS - Honey X) .. The graphics card (Sapphire Radeon 9550 256 MB) has very weak memory, you can't overclock it much 😉

My cold is still lingering somewhat but as the Geforce FX5900 Ultra was released in May 20 years ago I should at least manage to post... something before May ends. 😁

Nice results with the ECS K7S5A, it was a popular (and/because cheap) motherboard back then.

.

The Geforce FX5900 Ultra can not compete with the Radeon 9800 Pro in games and benchmarks that use DirectX9, we all know that. Without using "special drivers" the FX card has a hard time competing in most DX8 titles and benchmarks as well but in even older old games it usually shines.

.

Here are some benchmarks with the Nvidia Geforce FX5900 Ultra tested on the Asus P4C800 and P4 3.0C.

3DMark2001. Pentium 4 3.0C + Geforce FX5900 Ultra.

P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark2001.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark2001.JPG
File size
419.67 KiB
Views
1130 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

3DMark03. Pentium 4 3.0C + Geforce FX5900 Ultra.

P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark03.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark03.JPG
File size
340.8 KiB
Views
1130 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

3DMark05. Pentium 4 3.0C + Geforce FX5900 Ultra.

P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark05.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark05.JPG
File size
338.68 KiB
Views
1130 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

3DMark06. Pentium 4 3.0C + Geforce FX5900 Ultra.

P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark06.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark06.JPG
File size
351.9 KiB
Views
1130 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

Doom 3 1024*768 Ultra. Pentium 4 3.0C + Geforce FX5900 Ultra.

P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra Doom3 1024 Ultra.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C FX5900 Ultra Doom3 1024 Ultra.JPG
File size
271.74 KiB
Views
1130 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

.

The FX5900 Ultras results in 3DMark 2001 and 2003 are decent and at least close to the Radeon 9800 Pro. The Doom 3 result looks great until you realize that the FX series of cards aren't even using the same rendering path as the Radeon 9800 Pro but instead fall back to an older and less demanding one. In 3DMark2005 and 3DMark2006 the FX5900 Ultra gets totally crushed by the Radeon card.

When it comes to DirectX8 and older the performance gap (where there is one) to the Radeon 9800 Pro can probably be closed with overclocking. When it comes to DirectX9 the Geforce FX series seems as hopeless as ever.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 66 of 79, by Tom..

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hardly anyone had such cards at the beginning of 2003. I wonder how Doom 3 works, for example, on a P4 2000(Willamette), 2200/2400(Northwood) with a GF 5200/5500/5600 graphics card.
Performance will probably be very poor.

I found results with shadows on and off.. https://web.archive.org/web/20041216045113/ht … trona-4a.html#2

medium_800_2ghz.gif

Reply 67 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Tom.. wrote on 2023-05-31, 05:27:

Hardly anyone had such cards at the beginning of 2003. I wonder how Doom 3 works, for example, on a P4 2000(Willamette), 2200/2400(Northwood) with a GF 5200/5500/5600 graphics card.
Performance will probably be very poor.

I will test slower FX and Radeon cards a bit later when it's otherwise slow on the hardware front. 😀

.

With overclocking I was aiming to get the Geforce FX5900 Ultra to score over 20K in 3dmark2001 on a period correct system. The sensible way to do this is to mimic the clocks of the FX5800 Ultra 500/1000 as these are safe...ish clocks most FX5900 Ultra cards can handle.

For some reason the FX5900 Ultra went in to "limp home" mode as soon as I touched the memory clock. I tried a few tools with the same result and finally gave up. I have had this issue before and I probably solved it by using Coolbits but now I just couldn't be bothered. Instead I turned on the other available knobs until the clock said 20.

.

Even the Geforce FX5900 Ultra could do 20K+ points in 3DMark2001 back in May 2003.

P4 3.0C@3750 Geforce FX5900 Ultra OC

P4 3.0C @3750 FX5900 Ultra OC 3DMark2001.JPG
Filename
P4 3.0C @3750 FX5900 Ultra OC 3DMark2001.JPG
File size
433.51 KiB
Views
1072 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 68 of 79, by Tom..

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I have a weak motherboard (Medion) with P4 Northwood, but there is no possibility to overclock the processor..
The graphics card has nothing to do with 2003, I am posting the results as a curiosity..

03.png

05.png

Doom 3 1.2 Ultra 1024x768

bez-tytu-u.png

Reply 69 of 79, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Back before 1995 the internet did not exist for most people. Novell was the BIG Networking company connecting all kinds of computers
PC and Macs. With the release of Win-95 with Internet Explorer built-in and Webserver support the internet became main stream.
“E-commerce” over the Internet was the BIG Frontier. A NEW land to populate. Online banking was the 1st step. Get banks online to enable transactions for goods and services. EA Sports was the BIG video game maker for PC. The Intel Pentium was Dominating the computer market. Microsoft had a plan to get computers in every home in America.

Attachments

  • IMG_6146.png
    Filename
    IMG_6146.png
    File size
    1.36 MiB
    Views
    1031 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • IMG_6224.jpeg
    Filename
    IMG_6224.jpeg
    File size
    326.11 KiB
    Views
    1031 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • IMG_6338.jpeg
    Filename
    IMG_6338.jpeg
    File size
    169.49 KiB
    Views
    1031 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
  • IMG_6339.jpeg
    Filename
    IMG_6339.jpeg
    File size
    216.14 KiB
    Views
    1031 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 70 of 79, by debs3759

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

What has that got to do with the topic (hardware from 2003, early x64 CPUs and related stuff)?

See my graphics card database at www.gpuzoo.com
Constantly being worked on. Feel free to message me with any corrections or details of cards you would like me to research and add.

Reply 71 of 79, by Trashbytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
debs3759 wrote on 2023-06-01, 04:34:

What has that got to do with the topic (hardware from 2003, early x64 CPUs and related stuff)?

I too am confused by Dx33s post, perhaps they posted to the wrong thread ?

Or they forgot that 1995 was 28 years ago and has little to do with 2003 era hardware.

Reply 72 of 79, by gerry

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Tom.. wrote on 2023-05-31, 05:27:
Hardly anyone had such cards at the beginning of 2003. I wonder how Doom 3 works, for example, on a P4 2000(Willamette), 2200/24 […]
Show full quote

Hardly anyone had such cards at the beginning of 2003. I wonder how Doom 3 works, for example, on a P4 2000(Willamette), 2200/2400(Northwood) with a GF 5200/5500/5600 graphics card.
Performance will probably be very poor.

I found results with shadows on and off.. https://web.archive.org/web/20041216045113/ht … trona-4a.html#2

medium_800_2ghz.gif

what's interesting, other than the difference relating to shadows, is that doom 3 does work and could be played with a p4 2ghz and even fx5200 if willing to play at low resolution without shadows. Not played ideally perhaps, but kinda playable and i wonder if back then some people did want to experience doom 3 enough to accept compromises due to the hardware they had rather than wait to upgrade (i guess also true of many games in many years)

Reply 73 of 79, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

2001 thru 2010 was when G.W. Bush was president.
TV tuner cards and Multi media computers were all the rage.
Pentium-4 era.
Dell Optiplex, HP Pavilion, Compaq computers, Multi media keyboards with short cuts,
Windows XP, the release of WIFI Networking, Linksys WIFI routers, Gigabit Ethernet Networking. Cat-5 ethernet, Wireless G-band Networking.

Fry’s electronics, Radio shack, Circuit city, Good guys electronics, EBay, online computer auction sites,
Best Buy, Sears, Target, Walmart, Price club.

Nvidia Geforce, Voodoo 3, ATI Rage, Matrox Dual head video cards.

Intel and AMD

The NEW Frontier for Computers Today is the “Metaverse” “Virtual Reality” is the NEW Frontier.
And Robotics.

Robots can go places humans can’t and perform tasks to dangerous for humans.
( Rescues, Natural disasters, Man made disasters and contaminations, Space exploration. Etc )

Humanity Owes it to those that came before us and sacrificed their lives so we could get to this point in human evolution and technology.
The Good things that Robots are going to do in the future is astounding. The Rescuing of human lives.

It’s a Great time to be Alive and be part of this NEW Technology era.

The NEW Frontier is to Populate the Metaverse. Its the Next level in the Internet.

The Rumor is Apple will announce a NEW Virtual Reality headset at World Wide Developers Conference 23 ( WWDC23 )

Attachments

  • IMG_6343.jpeg
    Filename
    IMG_6343.jpeg
    File size
    92.91 KiB
    Views
    962 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
Last edited by Intel486dx33 on 2023-06-01, 16:47. Edited 6 times in total.

Reply 74 of 79, by Trashbytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Intel486dx33 wrote on 2023-06-01, 08:10:
2001 thru 2010 was when G.W. Bush was president. TV tuner cards and Multi media computers were all the rage. Pentium-4 era. Dell […]
Show full quote

2001 thru 2010 was when G.W. Bush was president.
TV tuner cards and Multi media computers were all the rage.
Pentium-4 era.
Dell Optiplex, HP Pavilion, Compaq computers, Multi media keyboards with short cuts,
Windows XP, the release of WIFI Networking, Linksys WIFI routers, Gigabit Ethernet Networking. Cat-5 ethernet, Wireless G-band Networking.

Fry’s electronics, Radio shack, Circuit city, Good guys electronics, EBay, online computer auction sites,
Best Buy, Sears, Target, Walmart, Price club.

Nvidia Geforce, Voodoo 3, ATI Rage.

Intel and AMD

The NEW Frontier for Computers Today is the “Metaverse” “Virtual Reality” is the NEW Frontier.
Robotics.

Robots can go places humans can’t and perform tasks to dangerous for humans.
( Rescues, Natural disasters, Man made disasters and contaminations, Space exploration. Etc )

Humanity Owes it to those that came before us and sacrificed their lives so we could get to this point in human evolution and technology.
The Good things that Robots are going to do in the future is astounding. The Rescuing of human lives.

It’s a Great time to be Alive and be part of this NEW Technology era.

The NEW Frontier is to Populate the Metaverse.

NANI?? 😮

Reply 75 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Well it's nice that the chat bots try to contribute to the topic but sometimes I wish that their owners did a better job tweaking their algorithms.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 77 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
wiretap wrote on 2023-06-01, 14:43:

Just about 20 years old.. 2004, my favorite SFF system: IWILL ZMAXDP Dual Opteron SFF

That is indeed a very nice system!

I have a couple of small form-factor systems my self that probably will be featured in the thread. One is an Asus s478 i865g based system and one is an Aopen s775 i915 based.

The Asus i865g system will turn 20 years old... about now and the i915 one next year. 😀

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 78 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

20 years ago today Intel released the Pentium 4 3.2C.

The 3200 MHz model of the P4 Northwood lineup is not much faster than the 3000 MHz model and therefor not very exiting and the testing/showcase reflects that by being somewhat of a low effort.

.

In Cinebench 11.5 the P4 3.2C beats the 3.0C by the smallest of margins.

P4 3.2C Cinebench 11.5.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C Cinebench 11.5.JPG
File size
286.99 KiB
Views
847 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

The story is pretty much the same in Frybench.

P4 3.2C Frybench x86.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C Frybench x86.JPG
File size
255.29 KiB
Views
847 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

7-Zip 32M, fast but not much faster than the 3.0C so not very exiting.

P4 3.2C 7-Zip 32M.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C 7-Zip 32M.JPG
File size
254.18 KiB
Views
847 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

P4 3.2C SuperPI 1M

P4 3.2C @3.7 SuperPI 1M.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C @3.7 SuperPI 1M.JPG
File size
241.54 KiB
Views
847 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

P4 3.2C SuperPI 32M

P4 3.2C SuperPI 32M.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C SuperPI 32M.JPG
File size
249.37 KiB
Views
847 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 79 of 79, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Some more benchmarks with the Pentium 4 3.2C

.

Aida64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx. The Pentium 4 3.2C does well here but so did the 3.0C.

P4 3.2C AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx.JPG
File size
449.63 KiB
Views
837 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

P4 4 3.2C + Geforec FX5900U 3dmark2001. I could not be bothered with switching back to the faster 9800 Pro.

P4 3.2C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark2001.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C FX5900 Ultra 3DMark2001.JPG
File size
398.4 KiB
Views
837 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

.

I will add some overclocked results. This P4 3.2C is actually a worse overclocker than the specimen of 3.0C it replaced but I don't think I have posted that many results with the overclocked 3.0C so I guess it doesn't matter much. The issue is not that the CPU can't clock higher, the issue is power delivery and a "loose" CPU socket. If I start ramping up the voltage the CPU ends up with charred power pins because of the bad contact. This CPU turned out to be more a bit more power hungry at the same frequency compared to the 3.0C.

.

P4 3.2C @ 3.7 Cinebench 11.5

P4 3.2C @3.7 Cinebench 11.5.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C @3.7 Cinebench 11.5.JPG
File size
287.77 KiB
Views
837 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

P4 3.2C @ 3.7 SuperPI 1M

P4 3.2C @3.7 SuperPI 1M.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C @3.7 SuperPI 1M.JPG
File size
241.54 KiB
Views
837 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

Aida64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx. Worse latency than "stock" because of the memory settings.

P4 3.2C @3.7 AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx.JPG
Filename
P4 3.2C @3.7 AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark plus PhotoWorxx.JPG
File size
452.6 KiB
Views
837 views
File license
CC-BY-4.0

.

It's summer and I live in a house in need of renovation so I will not be that active here at the moment. Winter is coming and it will bring more spare time that can be used for computer tinkering. 😁

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.