VOGONS


Newly made PCMCIA sound card

Topic actions

Reply 40 of 238, by radiance32

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-02-23, 21:39:

how is the sound when it plays through the computer speakers? I have brought the digital audio speaker pin out on my dev board to try it out but it is mono and i assume it sounds like crap more intended for modems? I had already been thinking about it for making fake modem sounds from my pcmcia esp8266 wifi model 🤣.

Midi (with that dream.fr chip and HardMPU Project) and OPL3 I am 100% confident I can do. For the other digital audio it is beyond me right now, but if I can move this forward a bit I know there are people here that can do this with their eyes closed just did not want to start it from the ground up. I have some IBM Mwave stuff I was interested to see what their "software/hardware" workaround is for lack of DMA in the early pcmcia versions.

The sound from the internal piezo speaker in the 200LX is horrible, and very quiet. (you literally have to put the 200lx on your ear like a mobile phone, when listening to digitized sound played through it)
If you want speakers, I think it's a much better idea to buy some modern micro speakers (like the ones they put in phones and tablets nowadays),
and put one or two (for stereo) in the LXsidecar housing. The 3d printed housing could contain some horizontal lines/holes on the front in front of the micro-speakers inside that allow the sound to come out,
and it would sound really good, like modern phone or tablet...
I would'nt bother with the internal piezo speaker of the 200lx,
also, I don't know if the PCMCIA interface in the 200lx has a connection to the internal piezo speaker,
and it would be a very dirty design if users will have to open up their 200lx'es and solder in some wires coming from the LXsidecar onto the piezo speaker inside the 200lx...

I think, if you want speakers, just buy a pair of those micro speakers that go into tablets and phones noawadays, and drive them with a tiny amplifier board in the LXsidecar,
you can get those tiny little amp boards very cheaply 😉

It's an interesting idea though 😀

EDIT: -> I think I could design the housing for the 200LX in such a way that it acts a little bit like a speaker box, and gives you a little bit more bass using the housing in the same way
as a speaker uses its housing to increase the bass response of the driver(s) in it. We could add a tiny port on the back so the speakers can push/pull sound through the housing, like many larger speakers have on the back (a port).

2nd EDIT -> Kevin -> Since we were talking about maybe putting in a headphone pre-amp, maybe we can find a small circuit board that has an amp for tablet/smartphone style speakers, an amplified headphone output, and a line out all at the same time... and have stereo speakers, a 3.5" headphone jack on the front and a 3.5" line out jack on the back of the LXsidecar...

3rd EDIT -> Kevin -> I've added an issue to explore this to our GitHub project, assigned to me... I'd like to look into this as it could solve a few of the ideas we already have and add a very useful feature: quality sound without headphones! 😀 )

Terrence

Check out my new HP 100/200LX Palmtop YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCVChzZ62a-c4MdJWyRwdCQ

Reply 41 of 238, by digger

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-02-23, 21:39:

I have some IBM Mwave stuff I was interested to see what their "software/hardware" workaround is for lack of DMA in the early pcmcia versions.

The following snippet from the VBE/AI 1.0 Specification (an attempt at a vendor-neutral abstracted sound driver API for MS-DOS in the '90s) might be of particular interest to you in this regard:

The basic interface is geared toward block oriented devices. This type of device may use a
DMA channel, or may have on-board FIFO memory for caching blocks of data. The
interface, for the most part, is the same for the application.

Non-DMA Block oriented devices can be supported as Block I/O devices that use timer
tick callbacks to keep data moving. The Disney Sound Source with a 16 byte FIFO, or
Media Vision AudioPort with a 1024 byte FIFO, are two examples.

(You can download this specification in PDF format through the VESA website, although you need to enter an email address before you are presented with the download site.)

So apparently a FIFO buffer in hardware, being fed by a software routine that hooks the timer interrupt so it gets called many times per second, is the best alternative way to implement a performant DAC if DMA is not available. This approach is also termed "pseudo DMA" elsewhere in that same document. Both the Disney Sound Source and the Media Vision AudioPort are parallel port devices, but there's no reason why such a mechanism couldn't also be implemented in a PCMCIA device. As for making it work with games, you could write a VBE/AI driver for it, and then use the already available DIGPAK or AIL2 wrapper drivers for VBE/AI to add support for it in quite a few games. For other games, a Sound Blaster emulator would have to be developed.

I've been working on a VBE/AI driver myself, and I'd be happy to share my knowledge with you if you're interested. 🙂

Reply 42 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
lolo799 wrote on 2021-02-23, 22:37:
I can answer that one, it doesn't sound that bad really, it just depends on the laptop, "newer" ones use the same speakers for t […]
Show full quote

I can answer that one, it doesn't sound that bad really, it just depends on the laptop, "newer" ones use the same speakers for the integrated audio card out and the basic system speaker sounds, so it's quite good on those.

On older models usually without integrated audio, the system speaker is just a piezo electric device which makes a somewhat distorted sound, it has its charm though!

I posted a sample here of me playing Doom using the Panasonic cf-vew211 opl3 based card:
Re: System Beeps - a PC Speaker music album

Interestingly enough the (also by Panasonic) fm radio pcmcia card can also output the audio signal through the system speaker, I tried on my 200lx and it was alright.

I assume it's mono, it's probably written in the pcmcia specs but I'm not going to look for the answer right now.

Great project you're doing yyzkevin, I'm eagerly curious to see how it goes.

Those sounded much better than I expected that is quite promising, I was specifically wondering about the HP200LX!

There are various pages of information about the speaker function of the spec, I have a few actual books helping me along as it is not that easy to find information online for this topic.

mpj4Qcxl.jpg

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 43 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
radiance32 wrote on 2021-02-23, 22:38:
The sound from the internal piezo speaker in the 200LX is horrible, and very quiet. (you literally have to put the 200lx on your […]
Show full quote
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-02-23, 21:39:

how is the sound when it plays through the computer speakers? I have brought the digital audio speaker pin out on my dev board to try it out but it is mono and i assume it sounds like crap more intended for modems? I had already been thinking about it for making fake modem sounds from my pcmcia esp8266 wifi model 🤣.

Midi (with that dream.fr chip and HardMPU Project) and OPL3 I am 100% confident I can do. For the other digital audio it is beyond me right now, but if I can move this forward a bit I know there are people here that can do this with their eyes closed just did not want to start it from the ground up. I have some IBM Mwave stuff I was interested to see what their "software/hardware" workaround is for lack of DMA in the early pcmcia versions.

The sound from the internal piezo speaker in the 200LX is horrible, and very quiet. (you literally have to put the 200lx on your ear like a mobile phone, when listening to digitized sound played through it)
If you want speakers, I think it's a much better idea to buy some modern micro speakers (like the ones they put in phones and tablets nowadays),
and put one or two (for stereo) in the LXsidecar housing. The 3d printed housing could contain some horizontal lines/holes on the front in front of the micro-speakers inside that allow the sound to come out,
and it would sound really good, like modern phone or tablet...
I would'nt bother with the internal piezo speaker of the 200lx,
also, I don't know if the PCMCIA interface in the 200lx has a connection to the internal piezo speaker,
and it would be a very dirty design if users will have to open up their 200lx'es and solder in some wires coming from the LXsidecar onto the piezo speaker inside the 200lx...

I think, if you want speakers, just buy a pair of those micro speakers that go into tablets and phones noawadays, and drive them with a tiny amplifier board in the LXsidecar,
you can get those tiny little amp boards very cheaply 😉

It's an interesting idea though 😀

EDIT: -> I think I could design the housing for the 200LX in such a way that it acts a little bit like a speaker box, and gives you a little bit more bass using the housing in the same way
as a speaker uses its housing to increase the bass response of the driver(s) in it. We could add a tiny port on the back so the speakers can push/pull sound through the housing, like many larger speakers have on the back (a port).

2nd EDIT -> Kevin -> Since we were talking about maybe putting in a headphone pre-amp, maybe we can find a small circuit board that has an amp for tablet/smartphone style speakers, an amplified headphone output, and a line out all at the same time... and have stereo speakers, a 3.5" headphone jack on the front and a 3.5" line out jack on the back of the LXsidecar...

3rd EDIT -> Kevin -> I've added an issue to explore this to our GitHub project, assigned to me... I'd like to look into this as it could solve a few of the ideas we already have and add a very useful feature: quality sound without headphones! 😀 )

Terrence

Yeah this is all good stuff for sure we are going to do it on our little LX sidecar. We can discuss the sidecar specifics in that github or in our palmtop thread, it is a bit different and will not be of interest to everyone here?. On that project we can go all crazy whatever we want because form factor is not an issue, on this "pcmcia card" has some other limiting factors so maybe it is not going to have headphone output for example, maybe we are going to go with feeding to the internal machine over speaker pin, or have lineout option fixed volume etc. Not sure yet.

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 44 of 238, by Gahhhrrrlic

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I suppose if the laptop is equipped with only a piezo then it would be kind of a waste for the sound card to work through that. However I have used many laptops with PCMCIA slots, which had nice multimedia speakers built in under the casing and like a previous poster mentioned, it sounds on par with today's tablets, etc. In fact 1 laptop I used (I forgot now which one), had a convoluted duct routed inside the case which exited at an oval shaped port, which was a mini sub-woofer. I mean we're talking a subwoofer with the volume of a laptop shell here so how good could it be but I thought that was the most awesome thing I'd ever seen in my life and no doubt it had better bass than any other integrated speakers... so yeah there's a spectrum for laptops, from cheap pc speaker to mono multimedia speaker to full stereo hi-fi + subwoofers 😁 There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a plug on the card to attach your own speakers. That's great if you can do it, but being able to route the signal through the computer's own speakers really grows on you when you want to use your laptop for what it was marketed for - portability. Playing Descent on a train with the computer in your lap and no paraphernalia to worry about really is a pleasure once you've tried it.

https://hubpages.com/technology/How-to-Maximi … -Retro-Computer

Reply 45 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Kind of reminds me I think of maybe Compaq Presario laptops of the early 2000's that had some kind of ported woofer setup if I recall.

I think we will make the card output to the internal speaker when no external headphones or speaker is attached.

Gahhhrrrlic wrote on 2021-02-24, 07:20:

I suppose if the laptop is equipped with only a piezo then it would be kind of a waste for the sound card to work through that. However I have used many laptops with PCMCIA slots, which had nice multimedia speakers built in under the casing and like a previous poster mentioned, it sounds on par with today's tablets, etc. In fact 1 laptop I used (I forgot now which one), had a convoluted duct routed inside the case which exited at an oval shaped port, which was a mini sub-woofer. I mean we're talking a subwoofer with the volume of a laptop shell here so how good could it be but I thought that was the most awesome thing I'd ever seen in my life and no doubt it had better bass than any other integrated speakers... so yeah there's a spectrum for laptops, from cheap pc speaker to mono multimedia speaker to full stereo hi-fi + subwoofers 😁 There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a plug on the card to attach your own speakers. That's great if you can do it, but being able to route the signal through the computer's own speakers really grows on you when you want to use your laptop for what it was marketed for - portability. Playing Descent on a train with the computer in your lap and no paraphernalia to worry about really is a pleasure once you've tried it.

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 46 of 238, by radiance32

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-02-26, 01:27:

Kind of reminds me I think of maybe Compaq Presario laptops of the early 2000's that had some kind of ported woofer setup if I recall.

I think we will make the card output to the internal speaker when no external headphones or speaker is attached.

Gahhhrrrlic wrote on 2021-02-24, 07:20:

I suppose if the laptop is equipped with only a piezo then it would be kind of a waste for the sound card to work through that. However I have used many laptops with PCMCIA slots, which had nice multimedia speakers built in under the casing and like a previous poster mentioned, it sounds on par with today's tablets, etc. In fact 1 laptop I used (I forgot now which one), had a convoluted duct routed inside the case which exited at an oval shaped port, which was a mini sub-woofer. I mean we're talking a subwoofer with the volume of a laptop shell here so how good could it be but I thought that was the most awesome thing I'd ever seen in my life and no doubt it had better bass than any other integrated speakers... so yeah there's a spectrum for laptops, from cheap pc speaker to mono multimedia speaker to full stereo hi-fi + subwoofers 😁 There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a plug on the card to attach your own speakers. That's great if you can do it, but being able to route the signal through the computer's own speakers really grows on you when you want to use your laptop for what it was marketed for - portability. Playing Descent on a train with the computer in your lap and no paraphernalia to worry about really is a pleasure once you've tried it.

Yeah, i agree 😀 If there is a 3.5" jack inserted into the headphone jack, use that, if not, send audio into the 1 watt amp IC and to the 1 watt micro-speaker 😀

Terrence

Check out my new HP 100/200LX Palmtop YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCVChzZ62a-c4MdJWyRwdCQ

Reply 47 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Still waiting on breakout board for the dream.fr midi chips that I received, digikey is a little bit off these days, sometimes next day sometimes next week. Started working on the HardMPU in the mean time anyway.

just quick picture of progress, I mentioned before but my Roland SCP-55 reconstructed CIS gets recognized fine and I see the expected i/o which is not a surprise but it is a good sign.

Vyj56Qhl.jpg
BLTViz9l.jpg

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 48 of 238, by radiance32

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-03-02, 22:43:
Still waiting on breakout board for the dream.fr midi chips that I received, digikey is a little bit off these days, sometimes n […]
Show full quote

Still waiting on breakout board for the dream.fr midi chips that I received, digikey is a little bit off these days, sometimes next day sometimes next week. Started working on the HardMPU in the mean time anyway.

just quick picture of progress, I mentioned before but my Roland SCP-55 reconstructed CIS gets recognized fine and I see the expected i/o which is not a surprise but it is a good sign.

Vyj56Qhl.jpg
BLTViz9l.jpg

Great work yyzkevin 😀 I can't wait to hear one of those dream.fr MIDI synth chips playing a tune 😀

Cheers,
Terrence

Last edited by radiance32 on 2021-03-08, 05:28. Edited 1 time in total.

Check out my new HP 100/200LX Palmtop YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCVChzZ62a-c4MdJWyRwdCQ

Reply 51 of 238, by etomcat

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello,

The problem with PCMCIA/Cardbus/Expresscard is the very thin and tightly enclosed space for electronics inside the host device, sans active cooling, which leads to overheating, heat induced signal noise and EMI troubles. Futhermore, the fan-out cables need to protrude anyhow and are prone to accidental damage.

Maybe it's better to place comms-only electronics inside the host (the expansion card) and use an external "pebble" containg Li-battery, DSP and amplifier in it for the actual heavy-lifting? Maybe even make the smartphone your pebble?

I mean non-Cardbus PCMCIA and even CompactFlash Bluetooth modules apparently existed and with 150mA power needs even the HP200LX may be able to support them, since Win98 drivers were available so they had something to do with DOS:
http://www.brainboxes.com/files/catalog/produ … 2-datasheet.pdf
http://www.brainboxes.com/files/catalog/produ … 0-datasheet.pdf

BR: Tamas Feher.

Reply 52 of 238, by radiance32

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
etomcat wrote on 2021-03-14, 12:37:
Hello, […]
Show full quote

Hello,

The problem with PCMCIA/Cardbus/Expresscard is the very thin and tightly enclosed space for electronics inside the host device, sans active cooling, which leads to overheating, heat induced signal noise and EMI troubles. Futhermore, the fan-out cables need to protrude anyhow and are prone to accidental damage.

Maybe it's better to place comms-only electronics inside the host (the expansion card) and use an external "pebble" containg Li-battery, DSP and amplifier in it for the actual heavy-lifting? Maybe even make the smartphone your pebble?

I mean non-Cardbus PCMCIA and even CompactFlash Bluetooth modules apparently existed and with 150mA power needs even the HP200LX may be able to support them, since Win98 drivers were available so they had something to do with DOS:
http://www.brainboxes.com/files/catalog/produ … 2-datasheet.pdf
http://www.brainboxes.com/files/catalog/produ … 0-datasheet.pdf

BR: Tamas Feher.

If you follow the discussions on the project's github page (https://github.com/yyzkevin/lxsidecar/discussions), you can see that the whole project was designed to be what you're suggesting,
eg, the LXSIdecar will be an external box/pcmcia card for the 200lx and other similar PCMCIA type systems with integrated dual PCMCIA Type II slots and integrated functionality such as audio (midi/GS music) and WIFI serial connections (including slip/ppp for TCP/IP access) etc... and it's own lithium battery pack and maybe even an amplified speaker...

Cheers,
Terrence

Check out my new HP 100/200LX Palmtop YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCVChzZ62a-c4MdJWyRwdCQ

Reply 53 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

no major issues I know of regarding pcmcia sound cards aside from the fact we just cant get them. so the goal here is to produce a compatible card that can be used.

space is not that big of a deal these days, components are so small I actually look for bigger options I can reflow at home myself and they are still within the mechanical constraints of the pcmcia card.

the work I am doing on this card will be integrated into our 200LX sidecar.

I have the PCMCIA Intellegent MPU-401 fully working now, and no issue to have onboard general midi chip. same with the OPL3 it was no issue. I am currently trying to implement a method compatible to that of the mwave ibm card, to get soundblaster compatibility without dma.

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 54 of 238, by radiance32

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-03-15, 00:37:
no major issues I know of regarding pcmcia sound cards aside from the fact we just cant get them. so the goal here is to pro […]
Show full quote

no major issues I know of regarding pcmcia sound cards aside from the fact we just cant get them. so the goal here is to produce a compatible card that can be used.

space is not that big of a deal these days, components are so small I actually look for bigger options I can reflow at home myself and they are still within the mechanical constraints of the pcmcia card.

the work I am doing on this card will be integrated into our 200LX sidecar.

I have the PCMCIA Intellegent MPU-401 fully working now, and no issue to have onboard general midi chip. same with the OPL3 it was no issue. I am currently trying to implement a method compatible to that of the mwave ibm card, to get soundblaster compatibility without dma.

As always, great work kevin! 😀

You've basically implemented a fully working hardware MPU-401 with a PCMCIA interface in about 2 weeks,
with no prior knowledge of MIDI and MIDI hardware / devices like MPUs 😉

"I take my hat off for you" for this achievement! 😉

I will be testing the 1-watt amplifier board and modern 1-watt tablet speaker in a week or so,
when they have arrived via courier, I'll be testing them out in my custom-built backlit LCD Game Boy Advance (the first generation, no the SP that flips open/closes),
to see if those tiny modern tablet speakers are good enough, or, if we need more powerful ones for the LXSidecar, like a 2 or 2.5 watt speaker.
My GBA has an aluminium housing, so it should be similar to the aluminium 3d printed housing for the
lxsidecar design that I have in mind... This will be a good comparison as both cases are made of aluminium and
will have a comparable internal volume, so the housing serves as a speaker housing, hopefully providing more bass,
especially if we add a port in the back for the speaker to push/pull audio through...
They won't be cheap to get 3d printed by a professional 3d printing company (aluminium ones), but, if cost is an issue, someone building an LXSidecar of his own can just use the same 3D files and get them printed in plastic using a home 3d printer or cheaper 3d plastic printing service...)

Cheers!,
Terrence

Check out my new HP 100/200LX Palmtop YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCVChzZ62a-c4MdJWyRwdCQ

Reply 55 of 238, by Bondi

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-03-15, 00:37:

I have the PCMCIA Intellegent MPU-401 fully working now, and no issue to have onboard general midi chip. same with the OPL3 it was no issue. I am currently trying to implement a method compatible to that of the mwave ibm card, to get soundblaster compatibility without dma.

This is awesome! Do you have an IBM card to reverse-engineer?

PCMCIA Sound Cards chart
archive.org: PCMCIA software, manuals, drivers

Reply 56 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Bondi wrote on 2021-03-15, 07:22:
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-03-15, 00:37:

I have the PCMCIA Intellegent MPU-401 fully working now, and no issue to have onboard general midi chip. same with the OPL3 it was no issue. I am currently trying to implement a method compatible to that of the mwave ibm card, to get soundblaster compatibility without dma.

This is awesome! Do you have an IBM card to reverse-engineer?

I do not, it would have been nice to. i got some other ibm mwave stuff isa cards but it seems to not use the same method.

I have an ESS chip here, and I am playing with memory map i/o to small ram chip on the card and using the tsr on the host to move the data along. I thought it was going to be too difficult but I started thinking about it after I went down the road of writing a TSR to deal with the MPU-401 not on irq2 when the card services refuses 2/9

I will need to get a full laptop that does not have a soundcard when I am ready to really start trying to test it.

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 57 of 238, by Bondi

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You've probably seen the IBM patent related to the IBM card? https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9 … e/US5768631.pdf
I'm not an expert unfortunately, but looks like there are a lot of technical details expalining how it all works, and it can be useful for someone who is into electronics. The question is what chip they usesd as an interface controller and if it's bespoke or not.
Also, just a thought, the are 4 inventors listed there. Maybe they can be contacted? Two of them are in Canada, btw.

PCMCIA Sound Cards chart
archive.org: PCMCIA software, manuals, drivers

Reply 58 of 238, by yyzkevin

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Bondi wrote on 2021-03-15, 07:59:

You've probably seen the IBM patent related to the IBM card? https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9 … e/US5768631.pdf
I'm not an expert unfortunately, but looks like there are a lot of technical details expalining how it all works, and it can be useful for someone who is into electronics. The question is what chip they usesd as an interface controller and if it's bespoke or not.
Also, just a thought, the are 4 inventors listed there. Maybe they can be contacted? Two of them are in Canada, btw.

Yeah I saw this. Funny enough that is where I live and grew up, Scarborough and Pickering are beside eachother.

What would be quite helpful would be if somebody could dump the CIS off the ibm card, with that along with the drivers I could work backwards to make something compatible with the existing software.

www.yyzkevin.com

Reply 59 of 238, by Bondi

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
yyzkevin wrote on 2021-03-15, 08:32:

What would be quite helpful would be if somebody could dump the CIS off the ibm card, with that along with the drivers I could work backwards to make something compatible with the existing software.

I don't mind doing this, but I have no idea how.
As for the drivers, here they are.
I include the autoexec.bat, the two files that are loaded and the archived whole drivers folder. There is nothing in config.sys apart form standard IBM CS and SS drivers.

PATH C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND;C:\DOS;C:\VC;C:\VR;C:\MWD\MANAGER;C:\ALTEC
SET TEMP=C:\DOS
REM IBM 3D Card requires CS and SS
SET MWROOT=C:\MWD
SET MWPATH=C:\MWD\MANAGER;C:\MWD\MWGAMES
LOADHIGH C:\MWD\MANAGER\MWPCMS.EXE
LOADHIGH C:\MWD\MANAGER\MWDGAME.EXE
SET BLASTER=A220 I5 D1 P330

Filename
MWPCMS.EXE
File size
8.17 KiB
Downloads
57 downloads
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
Filename
MWDGAME.EXE
File size
12.39 KiB
Downloads
55 downloads
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
Filename
MWD.RAR
File size
1.17 MiB
Downloads
66 downloads
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Funny enough that is where I live and grew up, Scarborough and Pickering are beside eachother.

There must be favorable atmosphere for PCMCIA sound cards developers in that area 😁

PCMCIA Sound Cards chart
archive.org: PCMCIA software, manuals, drivers