I've been dancing around Voodoo Rush rig lately, and was baffled by the same low fps score on a m/b i'd like to use there.
So far i've tested these configurations with a P1-200MMX, a Rush and a HDD being a constant, m/b and ram getting change.
FSB* MUL Quake1 timedemo 320x200 / 640x480 fps
Biostar M5ATD (ALI Aladdin IV+ 512K burst cache) + 64MB SDR on the fastest timings
66*3=200 49 / ??
83*2.5=207 54.4 / 10.5
Lucky Star 5I-TX2A (i430TX + 512K burst cache) + 64MB SDR on the fastest timings
66*3=200 49.2 / 16.0
75*3=225 55.1 / 17.9
83*2.5=207 54.9 / 18.4
Kaimei KM-V5-VPX (VIA VPX + 256K pipeline cache) + 32MB Simm (default 60ns settings)
66*3=200 44.7 / 15.3 (FPM Simm)
Intel TC430HX (i430HX + 256K pipeline cache) + 32MB Simm
66*3=200 45.1 / 15.5 (FPM Simm)
66*3=200 47.2 / 15.8 (EDO Simm)
I's say 10 fps is a pretty weird score for Aladdin IV+, as otherwise it's not a slouch of a chipset, and as 320x200 score suggests PCI bandtwith is there and CPU delivering just fine. Mebby some hidden PCI timings kicks in, mebby something IRQ related, mebby installing Win will help, idk.
I may test Aladdin V and MVP3 as well, but it may take a while. For these i'd suggest ALI would score low fps as well (just as Super Socket 7 low Quake benchmarks suggests), MVP3 score a tad higher than VPX.