Trashbytes wrote on 2024-07-20, 22:17:I have the 6800 Ultra AGP card .. its a freaking beast but ... any game that could take full advantage of that card will get ham […]
Show full quote
zuldan wrote on 2024-07-20, 16:53:
luckybob wrote on 2024-07-20, 14:04:
I mean... you can put that card into a brand new PC. Which kinda kills any "retro"-ness the card has. IMHO. And that's why I will cherish my AGP version of this card. 😀
It’s just a fun Windows 98 machine I put together to experiment with and don’t think of it as part of my classic retro collection. Although, people put the 6800 Ultra PCIE into machines and call that retro. Both the 850XT and 6800 were released in the same year 😉
The benefit with the AGP version is you have a much better selection of compatible Windows 98 boards. It’s a mega rare card (and probably worth double what my card ). I don’t think I’ll ever have the opportunity to own one. I’m a bit jealous 😉
I have the 6800 Ultra AGP card .. its a freaking beast but ... any game that could take full advantage of that card will get hamstrung by things not related to the GPU itself .. namely the CPU and the system bus speed, same applies to the X850 XT PE. This is why the AGP models are double edged cards .. Phenomenal Cosmic Power–Itty-bitty Living Space kinda situation.
The PCIe models dont suffer from this issue due to the wider range of hardware you can throw them into, even Win 98 set-ups with these PCI models run rings around the AGP versions, just something to consider before throwing a ton of cash at the AGP versions.
Though if you are like me .. buying them just to have them in the display cabinet while using the PCIe models is worth it if you can get a good deal.
Just curious, do you have links to any benchmarks showing this? I don't doubt that there are situations where the 6800 GT\Ultra and X850XT series is bottlenecked by CPU power, but I don't think that it was common enough or bad enough to limit the cards' usefulness at the time they were actually relevant in 2004. By late 2005 when the 7900GTX was out these cards were so massively outpaced by current generation cards that they could be classified as "mid range", and the CPUs that most enthusiasts were running then (socket 939) were common to both AGP and PCI-E systems.
In my main system back then I ran a 6800GT, 7900GTX, 7950GX2 and 8800GTX between launch-day for the 6800GT in early 2004 to the release of the 8800GTX in late 2006. I remember CPUs being a limiting factor in specific situations (mainly cities in Oblivion because of the crap game engine), but in most situations there was a *massive* night and day difference between, for example, the 7900GTX and the 8800GTX even with a socket 939 Athlon X2 4200+ on an Nforce 4 Ultra board. I didn't upgrade to a Core 2 Duo E6750 until July of 2007... and there was certainly a big improvement in CPU limited situations there(after overclocking), but we're talking about running an 8800GTX, which is 3-4x as fast as the 6800 GT\Ultra.
Again, not saying that there aren't situations where these 6800 and X850 series cards will work better on a more modern platform, but anything that most people would need to play in Windows 98 will already be insanely fast on a Geforce 6800GT + Athlon 64. Anything made after 2001 is probably best for an XP system where someone might as well just run some later card on a Sandy Bridge i7 or something.
For what it's worth, people can build whatever they want. Whether someone is building the best 2005 PCI-E system or the best 2005 AGP system is totally fine with me. 😁