Is there a patch to allow resolutions > 1920x1080 at 32 bit color for this like there is for 3dmark2000?

Strong results with from AMD...
MSI KA-780G/Phenom-II-X2-565+StockAirAM2-3/2x1GB CorsairXMS CL4/QFX3500(7900GS)/Yamaha YMF724F-V/SPCC A55 SATA/DVDRW SATA

MSI KA-780G/Phenom-II-X2-565+StockAirAM2-3/2x1GB CorsairXMS CL4/Giga RHD6870/Yamaha YMF724F-V/SPCC A55 SATA/DVDRW SATA

DarthSun wrote on 2024-10-05, 03:29:

Strong results with from AMD... MSI KA-780G/Phenom-II-X2-565+StockAirAM2-3/2x1GB CorsairXMS CL4/QFX3500(7900GS)/Yamaha YMF724F-V […]
Show full quote

Strong results with from AMD...
MSI KA-780G/Phenom-II-X2-565+StockAirAM2-3/2x1GB CorsairXMS CL4/QFX3500(7900GS)/Yamaha YMF724F-V/SPCC A55 SATA/DVDRW SATA

The attachment PHIIWXP_3DM99.jpg is no longer available

MSI KA-780G/Phenom-II-X2-565+StockAirAM2-3/2x1GB CorsairXMS CL4/Giga RHD6870/Yamaha YMF724F-V/SPCC A55 SATA/DVDRW SATA

The attachment PHIIWXP_3DM99_HD6870_1.JPG is no longer available

The attachment 225621_wqparjtycezxq2b2_1phiio.jpg is no longer available

The attachment 225621_agjmwpghslx8t4yb_7900gsmod.jpg is no longer available

The attachment 225621_ghnrauypllkiwgbt_img_20240318_205416.jpg is no longer available

I turned on the turbo.

Socket 754 Turion64 ML-37 - 1x512MB DDR400 -MSI K8N Neo - Quadro FX500 128MB did get 3DMark99 Max 15730 points @ 3Dnow (No OC)

3DMark Build Version: 200 - Game1 / Game2

Project Settings (Template):
Rendering Platform: Internal (NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23))
Resolution: 800*600
Color Depth: 16-bit Color
CPU Optimization: AMD 3DNow!(tm)
Z-Buffer: 16-bit
Frame Buffer: Triple buffering
Refresh Rate: VSync Off
Looping: Disabled
Texture Format: 16-bit, 4444 RGBA
Run Tests: Once
Title Screen: Shown

Test Results:
3DMark Result : 15,730 3DMarks
Game 1 - Race: 171.9 FPS
Game 2 - First Person: 145.0 FPS

System:
Windows Version: Windows 4 A , Build 2222
DirectX Version: 4.09.00.0904
Bios Version: )Phoenix - Award WorkstationBIOS v6.00PG
Bios Date: 03/23/06
Total Physical Memory: 512 MB
Free Physical Memory: 390 MB

Processor:
Processor Type: AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology ML-37
Processor Speed: 2006 MHz
Processor Caps: MMX 3DNOW SSE
L1 Cache Size: 128 KB
L2 Cache Size: 1,024 KB

Desktop:
2D Display Adapter Name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23)
2D Display Adapter Driver Date: 9- 6-2003
Monitor Name: Default Monitor
Monitor Driver Date: 4-23-1999
Desktop Resolution: 800*600
Desktop Color Depth: 16-Bit Color

3D Accelerator:
Name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23)
Driver Name: NVDD32.DLL
Driver Version: 4.14.10.4523
Total Video Memory On Card: 129,770 KB
Total Texture Memory: 194,368 KB
Bus: AGP

Wow some really interesting numbers in here!

My current system is a P4 661 3.6Ghz OC'ed to 4.24Ghz, with a Radeon 9800 (256Mb/256Bit) Oc'd to 425.25Mhz/357.75Mhz for GPU/Memory respectively. Have to do the full 3dmark printout i think! but the numbers are

3dMarks 25837
CPU:58596

marxveix wrote on 2024-10-06, 15:15:

Socket 754 Turion64 ML-37 - 1x512MB DDR400 -MSI K8N Neo - Quadro FX500 128MB did get 3DMark99 Max 15730 points @ 3Dnow (No OC) […]
Show full quote

Socket 754 Turion64 ML-37 - 1x512MB DDR400 -MSI K8N Neo - Quadro FX500 128MB did get 3DMark99 Max 15730 points @ 3Dnow (No OC)

3DMark Build Version: 200 - Game1 / Game2

Project Settings (Template):
Rendering Platform: Internal (NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23))
Resolution: 800*600
Color Depth: 16-bit Color
CPU Optimization: AMD 3DNow!(tm)
Z-Buffer: 16-bit
Frame Buffer: Triple buffering
Refresh Rate: VSync Off
Looping: Disabled
Texture Format: 16-bit, 4444 RGBA
Run Tests: Once
Title Screen: Shown

Test Results:
3DMark Result : 15,730 3DMarks
Game 1 - Race: 171.9 FPS
Game 2 - First Person: 145.0 FPS

System:
Windows Version: Windows 4 A , Build 2222
DirectX Version: 4.09.00.0904
Bios Version: )Phoenix - Award WorkstationBIOS v6.00PG
Bios Date: 03/23/06
Total Physical Memory: 512 MB
Free Physical Memory: 390 MB

Processor:
Processor Type: AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology ML-37
Processor Speed: 2006 MHz
Processor Caps: MMX 3DNOW SSE
L1 Cache Size: 128 KB
L2 Cache Size: 1,024 KB

Desktop:
2D Display Adapter Name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23)
2D Display Adapter Driver Date: 9- 6-2003
Monitor Name: Default Monitor
Monitor Driver Date: 4-23-1999
Desktop Resolution: 800*600
Desktop Color Depth: 16-Bit Color

3D Accelerator:
Name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 500 (45.23)
Driver Name: NVDD32.DLL
Driver Version: 4.14.10.4523
Total Video Memory On Card: 129,770 KB
Total Texture Memory: 194,368 KB
Bus: AGP

Same machine with ATi Radeon 9600XT 128MB No OC = 20086 points, Catalyst 4.2
I try even older catalyst 3.8 / 3.10 driver, they should maybe be bit faster and better.

Disruptor wrote on 2024-09-09, 08:54:

Bruno128 wrote on 2024-09-09, 07:10:

mkarcher wrote on 2024-09-08, 11:57:

This patch is only relevant for 486-class CPUs and the Cyrix 6x86.

And VIA C3 Nehemiah. Thanks it is confirmed to fix 0 fps there!

What scores do you get now on your C3?

C3 1.0A GHz Nehemiah with VIA CLE266 (CastleRock) IGP scores 2673 3DMarks with the fix.

3Dmark99 Max result with default resolution 800x600x16 and no OC = 1739p and vga mem OC = 2285 points @ ATi Rage3 (RageXL)

marxveix wrote on 2024-12-21, 00:38:

3Dmark99 Max result with default resolution 800x600x16 and no OC = 1739p and vga mem OC = 2285 points @ ATi Rage3 (RageXL)

Is this the integrated version of the Rage XL?

AntonPC wrote on 2024-12-21, 07:55:

marxveix wrote on 2024-12-21, 00:38:

3Dmark99 Max result with default resolution 800x600x16 and no OC = 1739p and vga mem OC = 2285 points @ ATi Rage3 (RageXL)

Is this the integrated version of the Rage XL?

Regular ATi Rage XL (Rage Pro) 8MB 2xAGP card.
https://www.vgamuseum.info/index.php/cpu/item … 108-ati-rage-xl

Motherboard Canyon CN-9V0MLV4 / Biostar U8668-D (Rev. 5.x)
https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/biosta … u8668-d-rev-5-x

This is the highest repeatable 3DMark99 Max score I could get with my AMD K6-III+ machine with 128MB RAM and a Nvidia RIVA TNT2 Ultra. Nowadays I use a modified 3DFX Voodoo 3 for glide, but I still keep the Nvidia card as a backup.

I actually have an even higher score of around 4600 3DMarks, but have not been able to duplicate it.

3DMark Project:
3DMark Build Version: 200
Date: 12/19/2020
Time: 8:51:45 PM
Project Name:My Project(1)
Comments:

Project Settings (Template):
Rendering Platform: Internal (NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Ultra)
Resolution: 800*600
Color Depth: 16-bit Color
CPU Optimization: AMD 3DNow!(tm)
Z-Buffer: 16-bit
Frame Buffer: Triple buffering
Refresh Rate: 74 Hz
Looping: Disabled
Texture Format: 16-bit, 4444 RGBA
Run Tests: Once
Title Screen: Shown

Test Results:
3DMark Result : 4,311 3DMarks
Synthetic CPU 3D Speed : 8,330 CPU 3DMarks
Rasterizer Score : 2,296 3DRasterMarks
Game 1 - Race: 50.6 FPS
Game 2 - First Person: 37.5 FPS
Fill Rate : 241.1 MTexels/s
Fill Rate With Multi-Texturing : 233.7 MTexels/s
2MB Texture Rendering Speed: 341.8 FPS
4MB Texture Rendering Speed: 225.9 FPS
8MB Texture Rendering Speed: 136.2 FPS
16MB Texture Rendering Speed: 88.6 FPS
32MB Texture Rendering Speed: 42.4 FPS
Bump Mapping Emboss, 3-pass: N/A
Bump Mapping Emboss, 2-pass: N/A
Bump Mapping Emboss, 1-pass: N/A
Point Sample Texture Filtering Speed: N/A
Bilinear Texture Filtering Speed: N/A
Trilinear Texture Filtering Speed: N/A
Anisotropic Texture Filtering Speed: N/A
6 Pixel/individual: N/A
6 Pixel/strips: N/A
25 Pixel/individual: N/A
25 Pixel/strips: N/A
50 Pixel/individual: N/A
50 Pixel/strips: N/A
250 Pixel/individual: N/A
250 Pixel/strips: N/A
1000 Pixel/individual: N/A
1000 Pixel/strips: N/A

System:
Windows Version: Windows 4 A , Build 2222
DirectX Version: 4.09.00.0904
Bios Version: Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG
Bios Date: 05/02/02
Total Physical Memory: 128 MB
Free Physical Memory: 59 MB

Processor:
Processor Type: AMD-K6(tm)-III Processor
Processor Speed: 600 MHz
Processor Caps: MMX 3DNOW
L1 Cache Size: 64 KB
L2 Cache Size: 256 KB

Desktop:
2D Display Adapter Name: NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Ultra
2D Display Adapter Driver Date: 6-26-2000
Monitor Name: Plug and Play Monitor
Monitor Driver Date: 4-23-1999
Desktop Resolution: 1024*768
Desktop Color Depth: 32-Bit Color

3D Accelerator:
Name: NVIDIA RIVA TNT2 Ultra
Driver Name: NVDD32.DLL
Driver Version: 4.12.01.0631
Total Video Memory On Card: 32,472 KB
Total Texture Memory: 70,360 KB
Bus: AGP

Supported Features:
16-bit Rendering
32-bit Rendering
Point Sampling
Point Sampling With Mip-Mapping
Bilinear Filtering
Bilinear Filtering With Mip-Mapping
Trilinear Filtering
Specular Gouraud Shading
Vertex Fox
Range-Based Fog
Table Fog
W-Fog
Sub-Pixel Accuracy
Alpha Blending
Addivitive Alpha Blending
Multiplicative Alpha Blending
Vertex Alpha Blending
Vertex And Texture Alpha Blending

Supported 3D Display Modes:
320*200, 16bit color
320*240, 16bit color
400*300, 16bit color
480*360, 16bit color
512*384, 16bit color
640*400, 16bit color
640*480, 16bit color
720*480, 16bit color
720*576, 16bit color
800*600, 16bit color
960*720, 16bit color
1024*768, 16bit color
320*200, 32bit color
320*240, 32bit color
400*300, 32bit color
480*360, 32bit color
512*384, 32bit color
640*400, 32bit color
640*480, 32bit color
720*480, 32bit color
720*576, 32bit color
800*600, 32bit color
960*720, 32bit color
1024*768, 32bit color

Supported Texture Formats:
15-bit, 555 RGB
16-bit, 5551 RGBA
16-bit, 4444 RGBA
16-bit, 565 RGB
24-bit, 888 RGB
32-bit, 8888 RGBA

I haven’t read through all the pages of this thread so apologies if it has already been mentioned.

I would like to know if it is normal for a Voodoo 1 card to display glitches / fuzzy image in 3DMark99 Max?

The card seems to work fine in games so I think the hardware is okay.

byte_76 wrote on 2025-01-01, 09:12:

I haven’t read through all the pages of this thread so apologies if it has already been mentioned.

I would like to know if it is normal for a Voodoo 1 card to display glitches / fuzzy image in 3DMark99 Max?

The card seems to work fine in games so I think the hardware is okay.

Your hardware should be fine. Methinks it's drivers. I also have a Voodoo 1 and had an issue with 3DMark99 too until finding better drivers. Also make sure that you are running the benchmark at 640 x 480 with double buffering. (Almost) All Voodoo 1's are only equipped with 2 MB of frame-buffer and 640 x 480 with 16-bit color is usually their limit. The other 2 MB of texture ram cannot be allocated to the frame-buffer. The image is probably still going to be fuzzy since the Voodoo 1 was made in 1996 with a lower quality VGA output than most display adapters from the following years.

Cheers.

lepidotós wrote on 2023-12-10, 12:46:

Dell OptiPlex GX1 Pentium II 350MHz Intel 440bx 128 MB PC100 RAM Windows 98 SE […]
Show full quote

Dell OptiPlex GX1
Pentium II 350MHz
Intel 440bx
128 MB PC100 RAM
Windows 98 SE

EVGA e-GeForce FX 5200 PCI
3DMark99
Stock 250/400: 2237 | 315/425: 2371
3DMark2000
Stock: 2194 | 315/425: 2202

New results, this time with a Radeon 9250 PCI I took from a computer to do a component-by-component test (and got greedy and decided to bench it).

3DMark99:
640x480x16 180/150: 2242 | Stock 238/182: 2293 | 250/200: 2303 | 266/208: 2309
800x600x16 180/150: 2202 | Stock 238/182: 2244 | 250/200: 2268
3DMark2000:
640x480x16 180/150: 2310 | Stock 238/182: 2292 | 250/200: 2308 | 266/208: 2302
800x600x16 180/150: 2297 | Stock 238/182: 2302 | 250/200: 2308

Slight glitches in 3DM99 at 250/200, more at 275/225 and a crash in 3DMark 99's Shooter test, with heavy corruption in 3DMark 2000 Helicopter. No corruption in 2000 at 250/200, getting up to a moderate amount around 266/208, which seems to be the best this card can do stably (though I think I'll keep it at 180/150 since it's basically no different). Since 266/208 doesn't net any extra performance, I'm skipping it for the 800x600 tests. To be honest, I would probably leave this card in there if this weren't The DOS PC (at least, until I get a K5 setup going), and the 2D Nvidia support wasn't important. I'm actually quite liking it so far, but the whole fog and texture thing is a bit of a dealbreaker for me on this particular PC, where D3D sub-7 is a very real factor given the processor.

I'm reminded of something someone said about the Radeon VII: it's not fast, but it's torquey. It's getting similar framerates at 640x480 as it is at 800x600 within a few digits.

Eventually I'll get the FX 5200 back in and re-test with the more advanced methodology, but for now this was fun.

DarthSun wrote on 2024-09-08, 10:21:

Bruno128 wrote on 2024-09-08, 10:08:

bloodem wrote on 2023-03-28, 05:19:

Did you apply all of the known patches?
I've attached my 3dmark99 patch pack which I think combines multiple patches that I've found over the years (works on a Ryzen 7 5800X3D with RTX 4070Ti).
Depending on which CPU you have (i.e. if you get 0 - 0.1 FPS on all tests), you might also want to apply mkarcher's NOTC fix

Hi. Where does one find this 3DMark 99 NOTC fix? Google points to your post.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RBV2-D3E5vUk … ?usp=drive_link

In this package - all patch 3DM99/2000/2001, NOTC too.

Thanks, good package!