Reply 20 of 22, by Jo22
- Rank
- l33t++
DaveDDS wrote on 2025-02-12, 22:48:There is an interface difference between 720k and 1.44m 3.5" floppy drives. The 720k transfers data between drive and controller […]
There is an interface difference between 720k and 1.44m 3.5" floppy drives.
The 720k transfers data between drive and controller at 250kbds ... the 1.44
transfers at 500kbps. This is how it stores twice a much data - twice as many
bits are written to each track (by sending them twice as fast).So, for 1.44 you not only need a drive and media that can handle the faster
rate, you also need a controller in the PC which can be switched to 500kbps ....
is it possible this system does not have an FDC that supports that rate?-- This is why the original PC/XT couldn't support HD (1.2m) drives, they
(with a improved FDC) came out in the AT. Being a 286 .. this is probably from
a similar time period, and nobody knew what standards to follow, because the
standards either didn't exist yet, or were so new that they had not been
widely adopted.
You're right about this. I think a workaround for this was to either use a 16-Bit ISA multi-i/o card or an floppy interface based streamer card (for backup tape drives).
Since only the 8-Bit portion was used by FDC on multi-i/o card, it was possible to use the card for this purppse.
On software side, DOS' built-in solutions like driver.sys or driveparm could be used to make an 1,44 MB drive available to DOS environment.
Or even better, 2M-XBIOS, a third-party floppy BIOS. https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/2m- … or-pc-xts.9672/
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//