kotel wrote on 2025-03-02, 08:23:
Okay in my parts bin I also found an SVF2N65D, although this one has only 2A continuous drain current.....
Should be OK... if nothing else, for a test. I suspect it will be fine, though.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-02, 08:23:
Same as CEF02N6 which isn't an MOSFET but an N-chanel enhancement mode field effect transistor... Although the datasheet shows its internal structure as an MOSFET.
Oh, but that is a MOSFET. 😁
Can use this one too.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-02, 08:23:
Then there's the IRFS730 N-MOSFET, albeit this one has 400v drain-source voltage and +/-20V gate-source voltage. But at least its continuous drain current is 5.5A!
Yeah, that 400V V_ds voltage rating won't cut it, at least for Europe or elsewhere with 220/230/240V AC line voltages. In fact, if you look at IRF's datasheet for this part here, note that right at the end of page 1, it says "for US line input only". This is because US / North American AC is 120V, which rectified comes out to about 160-165V DC. But on ATX PSUs, the primary voltage is double that - typically around 340V, as you noted with the Tagan PSU... and that's without APFC.
So OK for the first two, nay for the IRFS730.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-01, 21:38:
Was hoping the tagan would get fixed firstly, but I take whatever I can fix.
We'll get to it 😉 , I promise I haven't forgotten. Just not always having time to dig in and reply to each thread.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-01, 21:38:
Aha, got it. I'll try to put an 35w 12v bulb on 5v and see if that does anything.
Try 20W first, if you have that. I find the 35W and 50W halogen ones (MR16) will sometimes trip PSU's short-circuit protection, due to very low resistance when cold. Regular auto bulbs seem to behave a bit better... though the higher power ones (40+ Watts) can also exhibit pretty low resistance. So just beware of that.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-01, 21:38:
May I know how to see if they are okay? Since those are generic purpose OST or teapo or whatever FSP used don't give info about normal ESR readings. And now I got told from TRW server that I should just see if the capacitance is in spec. If it is then keep, if it isn't then bin.
I just put them on my component tester and check for proper capacitance + to see if the ESR is at least somewhat in spec / reasonable.
For small 5x11 mm caps for example, sometimes it's OK if the ESR is as high as 1-4 Ohms, especially on old 85C general purpose parts. But anything more and I usually look to replace it. For bigger caps, I expect the ESR to always be less than 1 Ohm, preferably even less than 0.5 Ohms.
Yes, GP caps don't list ESR on datasheets, but that's OK, because I find the cheap component testers aren't really all that accurate to make good comparisons anyways (or at least mine isn't.)
The other thing I (vaguely) look at is the V_loss, as that can *sometimes* indicate a cap with high leakage current (mostly applicable to testing low-voltage caps 16V and under.) Anything under 5% is typically normal (or the tester isn't able to capture it.) But above, I put the cap in series with a 1-kOhm resistor and bring it up to the full operating voltage of the cap. After roughly a minute, the current going to the cap should be very low - less than 0.03CV (uA), as specified in most datasheets.
Now TWR is correct that the capacitance is probably the biggest factor to use for analyzing, at least when it comes to regular GP caps without ESR listed. After all, electrolytic caps are +/-20%, so that gives quite a variance on the capacitance.
That said, when the capacitance starts getting suspiciously close to the +20% spec and if the cap in question is from a manufacturer and series that is known for becoming electrically leaky (e.g. Teapo SEK, OST RLP, Ltec LZG, just to name a few), I usually go in favor of replacing it.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-01, 21:38:
Yep, will do that but pretty much most of them show 0 ohm esr on my lcr t7 and capacitance is within spec on the big secondary ones.
Yeah, i have the same "problem" with my tester. It's not really a problem, but more so a limitation on the accuracy.
kotel wrote on 2025-03-01, 21:38:
As for the transformator are there any ways I can detect an short without disasembling it or testing it on an live circuit? I should have some left-over from dead LC clones and one from an dead delta 500w PSU.
Nope, no way to know really, other than opening it... but at that point, you're bound to create more problems with the transformer (core). So just leave it as is and plug it all in (through the dim bulb) to see what happens.
If the transformer is bad, the bulb will glow / stay lit. Of course, the bulb could be lit due to something else being bad. The worst part is that you do have to re-check a lot of components after powering up the circuit every time. In regards to that, once you've replaced all parts of the 5VSB that you thought were bad, make detailed notes of *all* of the in-circuit reading of various components that are likely to blow (e.g. the small TO-92 transistor, various diodes, and etc.) Once you have that list of in-circuit readings (resistance and diode tests), you can then use it to compare if anything has changed after you've powered up the 5VSB and if you suspect something could have burned out again. This way, you may save some time removing some components from the circuit to test them. (For example, if a 1-KOhm resistor reads 500 Ohms in circuit when everything was checked at the time, then very likely if that resistor still reads 500 Ohms after powering up the circuit, it probably isn't bad.)