retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
The card is a bit newer (8000 series), maybe BFG implemented something to keep this in check.
More about what PWM chip they used and how they compensated it is what can make the difference here... that is, if they even used a PWM chip and not linear regulators throughout. Would have to see / analyze the card to tell.
It can also matter how many additional ceramic caps are installed down the line, as those will also do a major part in the noise filtering. In some cases, these are doing all of the filtering, and the electrolytic caps are really only there for the feedback loop stability of whatever regulator is used.
retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
I figured that a huge difference would be a deffo nope. I read online that a smaller difference wouldn't be problematic. Deunan mentioned that 6.3v to 16v is a jump, and maybe it is. So, let this be an experiment to see if it is or isn't, I already ordered them last nights and they are coming in tomorrow (blazing fast, right?). I'm sure it will be more than fine due to the VRM not being picky as you mentioned.
I've done a lot of these experiments on my own hardware over the years, mostly because I'm either too cheap (particularly when dealing with lower-end stuff that's common or doesn't have much, if any, value) or don't have the right components stocked at the time of the repair. Didn't have a single case where it mattered. I think the worst was in an subwoofer amplifier, where (as a test) I replaced a 63V 4700 uF cap with a 200V 1000 uF cap, as that's all I had at the time. Was good enough to prove the amp worked, and then some more (let's make the walls shake for fun 😉 ). Of course I did order the right parts in the end. But in this case, this is a different application.
Speaking of which, in regards to your video card, the one thing that probably matters the most is the type of regulator modules that generated the rails for the GPU core and VRAM - i.e. linear vs. buck-type (with PWM controller).
With linear regulators (usually the VRAM on lower-power video cards), you can use just about anything on the input or the output of these in regards to electrolytic caps. The minimum on most of these is usually 100 uF, both for input and output. ESR / impedance - pretty irrelevant. Voltage and ripple current rating - completely irrelevant (the voltage rating just needs to be above the expected output voltage of that rail.) So as long as you don't go to "stoopid levels" with this - i.e. something like 10000 uF to really bog down the linear regulator with too much inrush current - you'll be fine.
Now, buck-type VRMs are a different story. There, the ESR/impedance does matter very much, as does the capacitance, along with the ripple current rating.
For these, you need low ESR / impedance to deal (filter) properly with the high-frequency noise and ripple. Of course, as mentioned above, if you have lots of ceramic caps already on the same rail, then those will take on the bulk of that task, leaving much less HF noise/ripple for the electrolytic caps to deal with. But since large capacity ceramic caps can be more pricey, some designs use fewer of these and more electrolytic caps... and that's where very low ESR/impedance caps become more important to the design. As for capacitance - usually going down by 30-50% won't cause issues, but is not recommended, as in some cases, it might (due to noise going higher and thus increasing the chances of bit corruptions.) And going above, I've gone as high as 4x more (+400%) and still not seen any issues. If anything, higher capacitance (again, within some reason) is usually a welcome thing, as it stabilizes feedback loops and smooths the voltage even further. In some cases, if planning to do extreme OC, increasing the capacitance a lot can help with this.
retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
Honestly, yeah I could've dug deeper, I've read that Samxon is alright and didn't see any complaints. I doubt they will fail catastrophically, I anticipate them just needed to be replaced again sooner or later as a worst case.
Indeed.
Probably at the very least you will get a few years out of them - and that's with heavy use.
After all, Samxon is a well-established brand, so one thing you can expect from their caps is *not* to break down (internally) shortly (a few years) after production, regardless if they were used or not... unlike cheap no-name caps, where this is much more often the case.
And FWIW, in most LCD monitor PSU applications I've encountered bad Samxon caps, the monitor was already 5-1o years old on average.
So I think your card will probably do at least "as bad" as that. 😀
Depending on the VRM design of the card, though, it might even not be a problem, ever... or within the useful lifetime of the card.
Speaking of which, seeing that this is a 8400 GS card, make sure the cooling is good. The 1st gen G8x chips from nVidia are right from the bumpgate issue. Anything over 55C on the GPU will be degrading those bump connections underneath the chip. A lot of these cards came with ultra-cheap heatsinks barely capable of cooling them, so that might be something more to worry about... unless it came with a passive heatsink, in which case, just stick a slow-turning fan onto it, and it will be fine.
retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
Amazon kinda has the same problem as Ali in my experience honestly, you can easily get ripoffs on Amazon too, especially on stuff that really doesn't normally get reviews. Aside from that, its awful for bulk buying and the prices are heavily marked up, not at all worth it.
Yeah, even with Amazon Prime (have a friend who has it), I still find the prices on most things to be much higher than on Ebay. I think a lot of it is due to the "hassle-free" returns policy on many things. As is well-known now, the bulk of returned Amazon items ends up getting trashed/landfilled/dumped. So to make up for this loss (in trashed products)... and not only that, but also still make profit for Mr. Bezzos... money still has to come from somewhere to cover all of that. And this is done by (heavily) increasing the prices of everything. So for every item sold and not returned, the purchaser covers a portion of the amount for stuff that was returned and trashed.
It's the same with Ebay and other places too. But at least with Ebay, individual sellers can decide whether or not they can accept returns, and how everything else will be priced in their store to off-set that.
retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
EBay is a community thing, at least they have reputability ratings. If it comes to bulk things, not the best, and the layout is also pretty bad. Sellers in my area love to add ridiculous shipping prices, like a 5 dollar item and 40 dollars shipping. Hard to find anything sensibly priced on there.
Go to Ebay and enter your country and zip code. Then,
Filters --> Price + Shipping = lowest first
. . . problem solved with all of those $1-5 listings and excessive shipping going all the way to the bottom of the list.
retroholicism wrote on 2025-05-15, 01:29:
I ordered a few things from there, but they were not packed well and the local conditions and shipping times would be pretty bad for electronics (40-50C summers, anyone???). EBay loves standard mail in my experience, and the mailboxes are just metal containers outside, so anything in there will get baked.
40-50C is actually not anywhere near bad for electronics, at least in storage. Only exception would be anything with lithium batteries and possibly soft plastics that might deform.
If anything, 50+ C is nice for one thing: at least you won't be getting any live roaches or bedbugs... or their eggs surviving. 😉