VOGONS


What game are you playing now?

Topic actions

Reply 7400 of 7406, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
keropi wrote on Today, 17:44:

just checked, this is a 400~450e card here (tax included) so it's not that bad... hmmm 😁

Just avoid the 8GB version, it's not worth saving 50 EUR for half the VRAM.

And if you want more options, check this video by Hardware Unboxed. They review the GPUs by price range, and should give you a good idea what's worth getting.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium

Reply 7401 of 7406, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
keropi wrote on Today, 17:13:

if anyone has a suggestion for a gpu do tell because now I fell in the rabbit hole of specs and stats and I want to get the 5070ti but I cannot really justify the cost 🤣 so I am all ears on this one , I've been out of the loop for quite some time now
ideally spending something like 400e in the end sounds good to me

I was in the market for a gpu and $400US was my budget. I narrowed it down to either the Radeon 9600XT 16GB (~380) or the GeForce RTX5060Ti 16GB (~430). The 5060Ti is a little faster and a little more expensive, plus has better RT and upscaling performance. Either of those would be a great upgrade.

I ended up getting a 5070Ti for my son at MSRP (~750). He will give me his 4070 12GB and $400. He gets a 50% upgrade for $400 and I get a 50% upgrade for $400. The 4070 is a faster card for me than either the 906oXT or the 5060Ti, so it was a win-win for the two of us.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 7402 of 7406, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Joseph_Joestar wrote on Today, 17:49:

Just avoid the 8GB version, it's not worth saving 50 EUR for half the VRAM.

I agree 100%.

Here is a chart a made up when trying to decide. The cost was determined by price checking between Newegg and Amazon and is specific to my location. The average FPS was taken from a recent comparison at techpowerup.com. The cost for the RTX4070 was what I paid for it a couple of years ago. Current pricing is much higher. And the RTX2080 framerates were thrown in because that is what I am upgrading from in my system.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 7404 of 7406, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
keropi wrote on Today, 18:24:

thanks both of you for the info it seems 9060xt/5060ti is the "medium" card now - exactly what I need
will check local prices and decide which to get

Both are very good picks in that price range.

When I was building my last system, I went with Nvidia because I wanted DLSS, or more specifically DLAA. I'm also very used to their drivers, and I like to customize game settings via Nvidia Profile Inspector. But AMD has a really strong mid range offering this generation, so it's basically down to one's preferences. Also, if you're thinking about gaming on Linux in the future, then AMD is a better choice, due to their superior driver support on that OS.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium

Reply 7405 of 7406, by Sombrero

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Completed Tomb Raider Legend, the first game of the first reboot series. Felt like playing something short and light and figured to revisit this one. The good? Music isn't bad at all, I have some foggy memory of the composer winning some award for it back then. But everything else.. this has to be the most aggressively mediocre game I've played in a good while.

The story is dumb, the levels are incredibly simple and the combat is just boring and kinda bad, and there's way too much of it. There are no puzzles besides pushing a box of some sort onto a pressure plate or something now and then, otherwise it's entirely acrobatics and combat. Acrobatics isn't terrible but it's not great either, the game tends to go for cinematic camera angles which coupled with camera relative controls causes annoying deaths. And combat is simplistic and boring, there are a few wild animals but not many so 99% of the time you'll be shooting bullet spongy human soldiers. There are also boss battles and they just straight up suck.

The game also has a wonderful habit of shoving tutorial messages down your throat nearly the entire game. I think it decided to remind me what the goddamn jump button is in the second to last level for crying out loud. And no, they cannot be disabled.

Back in the day I had this for XBox 360 and remember liking the Croft Manor and the last actual level the most, that hasn't changed. The Croft Manor is a separate level like in the classic games, no combat whatsoever, just exploring the manor and finding all the secrets. Easily my favorite level.

I remember liking the next game Tomb Raider Anniversary much more which is a remake of the original TR1, even though it of course can't compete with it. But whenever remakes can. But I think I'll skip over it and go straight to Tomb Raider: Underworld which is direct sequel to Legend and one I've never played. I'm not expecting to find some hidden gem here but it would be nice if it was at least a bit better than Legend.

Reply 7406 of 7406, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Sombrero wrote on Today, 21:45:

Completed Tomb Raider Legend, the first game of the first reboot series.

Thanks for the review!

I tried this on my Xbox 360 a while back, but just couldn't get into it. The controls felt clunky, and the environments were kinda bland and uninteresting. I never played it back in the day, so I always end up comparing it to the 2013 game, which is a significant improvement in every single aspect, at least for me. I know the Legend trilogy has its fans, but it just didn't click with me. In contrast, I can replay the OG Tomb Raider from 1996 anytime, and still love it. Same for the Survivor trilogy, well except for Shadow, which is just kinda meh.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium