giantenemycat wrote on Yesterday, 11:30:In my experience, the NVIDIA NVS 280 is the most consistently available (and cheap) PCI card that's actually "capable" . Perfor […]
Show full quote
johnvosh wrote on Yesterday, 10:50:
It just sucks that there is no AGP slot, so have to find a decent & cheap PCI video card as the integrated video isn't that great.
In my experience, the NVIDIA NVS 280 is the most consistently available (and cheap) PCI card that's actually "capable" . Performs like a FX5200 apparently, which would be more than fine for a K6-2. Just depends on how period accurate you want to be. Otherwise you will have to keep an eye and refresh for PCI cards, filtering through all the PCI-E, AGP and incorrectly described junk - that's how I got a Radeon 7000 PCI in box for £30.
I do have a SD to IDE adapter in it and am going to put 98SE on to it.
Oh no :(
Anyone ever get this popup back in the early 2000's!? I remember having a non-legit copy and was installing it on computers for family and friends and then we started getting this!
Yeah that drove my dad crazy enough to get a legit key. It was on our second family computer he got used from a little computer shop in 2006 - 450MHz PIII / 440BX / 256MB / Radeon 9200. I think he contacted Microsoft and they sent the copy? I would imagine they didn't send it for free...
PCI Radeon 7000 on pure DX6 stack would be okay, but you really do not want to put a GeForce5 FX (or anything DX8+) on a K6-2!
K6-2 inherits Socket 7 era assumptions. Fundamentally, the main bus was designed with L2 cache on the motherboard that predates Direct3D abstraction layers - it's an architecture from an era that expected to push data between DOS and 3Dfx Glide, not between NT5x and DirectX shader models.
That next generation Direct3D driver overhead will overload the L2 cache causing lower FPS. There are two problems. DX8+ shader pathways will add orchestration the L2 cache was never expected to host, and DX9+ shader translations the L2 cache was never expected to host.
I'd expect higher frame rates with DX5/DX6/DX7 era drivers. 3Dfx cards would set benchmarks, and something like GeForce4 MX with 128bit VRAM would be the cheap powerful later era upgrade - but hard to find in PCI format.
Actual cheap PCI cards today means one of the newer cards sold for use in network servers, and some of those reuse GPUs that were actively supported by Win9x drivers and DirectX6 HAL drivers so you can activate the GPU with minimal CPU overhead - but most server graphics have memory bus halved (64bit DDR is slower than 128bit SDR).
Hmm..
PCI Matrox G450/G550 64bit DDR is a good proxy for PCI cards that actually existed: PCI TNT 128bit SDR, PCI Starfighter 128bit SDR, PCI 3Dfx Banshee 128bit SDR, ...
