Grzyb wrote on 2026-06-24, 19:41:
... Normal FTP clients behave like Unix.
But from a Commander-like FTP client, I expect hiding the useless things.
Agreed, which is why DDLINK doesn't show "." .
Keep in mind that DDLINK is NOT "FTP". I didn't design it to be like other dual-panel methods, it just happens to look a lot like many - I wrote it 30+ years ago as a means of transferring ImageDisk images (as much 1.5m/file)
ImageDisk has to run under DOS because it accesses the floppy controller directly and in non-standard/unusual ways... Great if you have a DOS system, but some don't, so I made up a DOS boot floppy that runs entirely from a RamDisk (so you can change disks to image)
Hence, all things have to be SMALL - DDLINK is a single 17k .COM that needs no networking software other than a "packet driver". It can also transfer over parallel or serial interfaces. I used my own Micro-C compiler with several modules in .ASM.
It doesn't run under Unix or anything not DOS.
I didn't want to add code to "fix" things that should never happen. Later when I discovered that DosBox incorrently shows ".." at the root of a mounter drive, I didn't add code to remove it as it doesn't cause a problem.
I think a dual-panel FTP client is a great thing ... but I personally wouldn't bloat it with code to "hide" useful things that OS would normally show (and ".." is useful - select to go up a directory) - just my opinion.
- Dave ; https://dunfield.themindfactory.com ; "Daves Old Computers" ; SW dev addict best known:
ImageDisk: rd/wr ANY floppy PChardware can ; Micro-C: compiler for DOS+ManySmallCPU ; DDLINK: simple/small FileTrans(w/o netSW)via Lan/Lpt/Serial