Geforce2 MX = no pixel shaders = no wrapper. Period.

Alright, that's my bad if it don't have pixel shader. BTW, is GF2MX has better performance than Matrox G400?

You could certainly use old Glide wrappers from that era. I remember using a wrapper with a TNT2 (but only for UltraHLE).

And a Geforce2 MX400 is definitely a lot faster than a Matrox G400, even if the memory bandwith is about the same.

I use GeForce2 MX non-400 but not MX200 😀

Deus ex 2 was the first game to require pixel shaders so I would look at games released before it
so nothing later than 2003

Is GTA III works fine on GF2MX? The GTA III poorly ported from console (same as GTA IV)

I remember that the original Deus Ex ran poorly on a Geforce2 MX especially when using 32-bit color, which was the reason I upgraded to a Geforce3 Ti. So I assume that GTA3 would similarly struggle on a Geforce2 MX.

Geforce 2 in general does poorly with 32bit color. These cards are very inefficient. 2MX is essentially a halved GTS all around and so it's just as bandwidth limited.

I've used a GF2 MX myself for a while, you'd be best to only use it for games along the Y2K barrier, anything past 2001 is gonna be slow.
It's not too bad though, but see if you can get a GTS in there.

Nah, if you can, get a GF4 Ti or just go to a FX 5900.

Try Serious Sam: First Encounter on it.

GTA 3 run okish on Radeon 8500 and poorly on GeForce 4, so GeForce 2 MX is out of luck. Good games I recall playing with it were RTCW, Colin McRae Rally 2.0, Operation Flashpoint, Shogun, IL-2 Sturmovik. 1024x768x32 is the usual limit of playability.

Yeah GTA3 was murder on systems at the time, it wasn't untill GF3 that mainstream cards could do it really, unless you had an ULTRA or something wacky.
I wish it would let me try it with my V2 SLI for laughs.

I wonder what GTA5 will be, as only now i can play GTA4 it its full glory 😉

It's the same engine but bigger in every way, so expect similar perfomance. Probably comparable to San Andreas vs GTA3.