I don't see that there is any inherent problem with 386 vs 486 vs Pentium etc, providing you have the mobo directions. I have two 386s. One is from 1989, @ 20 Mhz and has 2 MB of Ram. It seems very ancient compared to my other 386 which is an AMD 386 @ 40 Mhz from 1993 and has 32 MB of RAM. The older one which is a dual booting DOS/MOS machine has lots of jumpers, but the instructions are all very clear on what to do with them. The newer one is running Windows 3.11 with networking. So that machine is virtually modern. The older 386 does not have networking so I DO rely on the floppys to move a file or two back and forth. However, it has a 1.44 MB boot drive and a 1.2 MB secondary. I can't imagine a reason to retain an old 360k drive, unless it is for strict originality in a "show computer" or something like that. I also upgraded the old 386 from the original MFM hdd which was RLL formatted, with a smart IDE controller capable of handling a couple of 40 MB hdds with its own BIOS. That really helped make that computer easier to maintain.
I also have a 486 @ 66 Mhz and 128 MB of RAM. That one is running Windows 95b and is on the network. It isn't hard to work on either since I have the original Gateway instructions. Actually the plug-n-play is not THAT dependable, and you are still required to set some IRQs and Addresses when it comes right down to it.
Of the three, I enjoy the newer 386 the most. It runs Windows, has networking, and is still very DOS oriented, booting into DOS 5.0 first. To me it is like the best of both worlds. 😎
Retro stuff owned since new
- 386 20Mhz 2MB DOS 3.3/PC-MOS 4.0
- AMD 386 40Mhz 32MB Win 3.11 DOS 5.0
- 486DX-2 66Mhz 128MB Win 95b
- PIII 450Mhz 768MB Win 98SE
- PIV 2Ghz 2GB Win XP/Ubuntu 10