badmojo wrote:(...) the FX are dry and lifeless compared to most clones I've tried.
I'm curious about this statement. I'm not sure what you mean by dry, but i have a Yamaha Audician 32 along with GUS Classic, AWE64 Gold and Pro Audio Studio XL.
The YMF-71x chipsets are capable of 16bit 44KHz mixing, something that Sound Blasters up to the Pro 2 can't do. Then, while they can do the former, all the SB 16's and AWE32's i tried have way more line noise than my Audician 32's, believe it or not. The OPL output from the CT-1747 also sounds a bit harsher on my ears but some people might like it, i have no real gripes with CT-1747's.
The best analog output from SB's come from the AWE64 Gold which is still far from impressive. It is difficult to compare 2 cards on a fly but i have the advantage of using a mixer. So i can compare thm head to head on real time without having to make recordings. Same mixer, same cables, same speakers.
The most silent card in my system is the GUS classic, followed by the Audician 32 and the Pro Audio Studio XL. If you ask me, the Audician 32 still wins versus the XL, as it outputs louder than the XL. To hear hissing from the Audician i have to crank the volume really loud to a point the XL makes pretty much a comparable level of hissing against the former. The GUS Classic is awesome with less hiss than the former cards, and while some people might find it hard to believe, the AWE64 Gold is the card that hisses the most. The AWE64 Gold will however become the best card if one uses SPDIF. But were talking analog output here.
What i am trying to say is the Audician 32 is as nice PCM wise as the PAS XL, or even the AWE Gold. Try some Inertia Player with a true SB Pro 2.0 and then an Audician 32. If one still finds the Audician to be dry, whatever that means, well i guess dry is good. At least on my ears. 😎